It comes from here https://www.racedepartment.com/threads/rate-the-sims-community-edition-rfactor-2.175996/So where does this 3/10 rating come from? If I have made such a rating I have also written why I gave it. If you are going to nail me down to a number then at least take the words that come it...
Satisfied? I hope you didn't think I made it up?
For some reason I remembered your name as someone who just loves to take jabs at rF2 while touting up AC at the same time. I like to know who I talk to, and where they come from so I checked last years' ratings from RD, and low and behold there it was. 3/10 for rF2 and 9/10 AC.
I'm sorry, you may not like rF2, but anyone who rates a sim that has one the best if not the best FFB and physics so low, is very likely just trolling whenever the chance. 3/10 is just garbage rating for any sim imo and if I see someone that constantly throws jabs at specific sim, I wonder if his motives are genuine (to try to make the sim better) or if he just wants to bring the sim down. Generally the language the person uses is also telling (sim is crap, online is dead, servers are crap, etc. without specifics or even substance). For instance you called rF2 online dead which is BS. If so that means AMS, R3E and should I even mention AMS? - are all dead as well. Maybe we should just give up and play AC?
I'm no rF2 cultist (hello Martin ), I totally agree with you that rF2 has shortcomings and I actually rated both AMS and R3E higher in those polls myself. Some other sims may be a better overall package than rF2, but I won't deny it has it's strengths in things that matter.
ETA: I just checked and you didn't give a reason why such a low rating (or I missed it). You gave a reason in AC thread why you gave it 9/10 though. I guess rF2 wasn't worth wasting your time to write something so you just gave it crap rating and left