2021 Formula One Belgian Grand Prix

Spa Francorchamps 2021 Grand Prix Formula 1.jpg
F1 returns after the summer break to take on Spa Francorchamps for the 2021 Formula One Belgian Grand Prix, with both the drivers and constructors championships still tightly contested.

Formula One is back on track this weekend after their summer break. This week the challenge is the fan favourite and sim racing mainstay Spa Francorchamps circuit.

The F1 cars will be full throttle for 80% of their laps at the Belgian circuit. The course also offers more passing opportunities than many of the sites on the F1 calendar, so the racing action should be solid.

On the weather front, cool and wet conditions are expected over the weekend. It’s too early to predict the severity of the wet conditions at race time, but there’s a high probability of a wet track through each of the Grand Prix sessions.

Looking at the standings, Lewis Hamilton finds himself at the top of the drivers’ standings, but just eight points clear of Max Verstappen. The rivalry between the two drivers has heated up in recent races, and it looks like the battle will be fierce for the remainder of the season. The degree of Mercedes’ recent upgrades is yet to be determined, but even a small increase in performance relative to Red Bull could have huge implications on the season outcome.

Between the constructors, Mercedes and Red Bull have nearly doubled the next closest team in points, and the two powerhouses will look to not only win races with favourites Verstappen and Hamilton, but also fight hard to get Valtteri Bottas and Sergio Perez on the podium to collect increasingly more valuable points in the remaining races this season. Currently the teams are separated by just 12 points in the constructor standings.

Behind the lead teams and drivers, there are some fierce battles happening as well. McLaren and Ferrari are tied at 163 points in the constructor standings. This rivalry has been close all season, and the teams will now start on equal ground for the back half of the season.

Lando Norris for McLaren enters the race at Spa in third place in the driver standings. This is an impressive feat, showcasing both his speed and consistency, and placing him ahead of both a Red Bull and a Mercedes driver overall.

The dramatic Hungarian Grand Prix was the last F1 event and saw Esteban Ocon earning an impressive victory. He was able to avoid a chaotic turn 1 and maintain his lead until the end. Sebastian Vettel crossed the finish line in 2nd place, but later had the finish taken away due to a rule violation. Lewis Hamilton found himself in an awkward position with the conditions changing in Hungary, and was the last to pit for dry tires. He was able to fight through the field (including a defensive driving clinic from Fernando Alonso) and ended up getting a podium finish, which had a significant impact on points in the championship fight.

Whether the high level of excitement of the Hungarian Grand Prix will continue through a wet Belgian Grand Prix is still to be determined, but it’s hard to imagine this weekend being anything less than thrilling.

Let us know your expectations for this weekend’s race in the comments below.
About author
Mike Smith
I have been obsessed with sim racing and racing games since the 1980's. My first taste of live auto racing was in 1988, and I couldn't get enough ever since. Lead writer for RaceDepartment, and owner of SimRacing604 and its YouTube channel. Favourite sims include Assetto Corsa Competizione, Assetto Corsa, rFactor 2, Automobilista 2, DiRT Rally 2 - On Twitter as @simracing604

Comments

People got injured in dry races too. Should we stop them also?...

So because nothing is perfectly safe, we shouldn’t have any safety standard at all? Properly maintained airplanes still crash, therefore we shouldn’t require aircraft maintenance.
 
Might have been better if they have said "match postponed" and then hold the race in a month or so.
Easier said than done, but maybe it is something they can look at in the future for this track in particular.

The race probably would have gone ahead at paul richard in these conditions, and made it better to watch.
 
Last edited:
So because nothing is perfectly safe, we shouldn’t have any safety standard at all? Properly maintained airplanes still crash, therefore we shouldn’t require aircraft maintenance.
The strawman is amazing in that one, talk about taking a quote out of it's context.
 
Sky diving is fun!
Sky diving is dangerous!
I love skydiving in clear skies!
However, you shouldn't skydive in a severe thunderstorm...you could get hurt.
"But people get hurt skydiving in clear skies too. Should we stop them also?..."

:rolleyes:

Don't be this guy. Let the people on the ground in the thick of it weigh the risk vs. reward and do what's within a reasonable margin for error. I never said "DRY = LET'S RACE! SLIGHT DRIZZLE = DON'T RACE!"...but that's the narrative you keep pinning on me.

Max was trailing the safety car which wasn't giving off much spray, so his judgement on what was acceptable or not is missing the big picture. Everyone behind him was saying they can't see. Everyone behind him can also physically feel the grip levels or lack thereof...but yea, Richard's gonna sit at home and make the expert assessment that the race should go on...WELL I don't know what I was THINKING...you're absolutely RIGHT Richard!! How could I have been so blind!! You clearly are the man with all the answers! I suggest you send your CV in to the FIA for the job of race director immediately, cause you CLEARLY know your s*** better than anyone on the ground that's for damn sure!

...or something else to do with s***...I don't know.
The "people on the ground" just made a mockery of the sport, and robbed fans who payed good money for tickets and broadcasts of a race, today, tomorrow, or any day.

We had a podium made of the qualy order, because they were so coward, they exploited their own rules to call it a race, after sitting on their hands waiting to stop raining, when it has been raining like that for two days, and weather forecasts werent saying it would improve today, and AFTER the kids ran an F3 race in similar conditions.

No amount of patting in the back will change that. You can play the "what ifs" game all you want, because i can play them too.

So if this is how it's going to be, fine. You and the FIA will just assume that F1 cant race in the wet and thats it, no need to argue about how much water is coming off the back of the cars, because that is after all subjective, and open to being influenced by who had most to gain at the particular moment.
 
That day when you thought that F1 had reached the lowest level of credibility, not watching anymore because it looks fake to you and then they drop to a new low with a mockery of the sport and the championship with the ridiculous display this afternoon in Belgium.
3 laps behind a safety car, already knowing that would be all of it and we have a winner.
It would be sad if F1 was not already a joke, so no big deal, just an other act in the comedy that series has become.
 
Last edited:
It is normal they didn't race in those conditions. Pretending there still was a race to award points and avoid refunding the crowd is a pity.
I don't think it's about refunding the crowd and more about fulfill the contracts FOM has with the "track" and organizer. I can imagine they wouldn't have to pay (as much) when there is no race, but this way there was a "race" with a winner, points etc. so the FOM get's the full money.
 
The reasons that they could not race tomorrow:

1-The track marshalls have day jobs and it's likely that most of them could not be there tomorrow;
2-The teams have to pack up and leave for Zandvoort. The schedule is very tight and don't forget that there will be 3 races in 3 weeks. Team members are already under tremendous time constraints.
3-TV viewership would be catastrophic if the race was held on a monday. Attendance at the track too. And if the race was held tomorrow, the (slim) possibility of refunding the tickets is definitely out.
There is no guarantee that the rain would be less than it was today. The race Tomarrow could have ended up being called off also.
 
Premium
Since the highlights of this year's Belgian GP ammount to 3-and-so minutes of a cue of wet cars,
here are the highlights of the 1998 Belgian GP. Enjoy the trip back to one truly eventful F1 race... :confused:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R22nxVYLaBQ

Posted it as media but F1 won't allow remote linking so, you gotta click. :(
Murray's commentary is worth it though! :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
During his podium interview, Lewis stated: he hoped the fans get refunds. I would think the drivers could chip in a teeny tiny portion of their salaries and cover the cost of refunding the entire audience. After all, it was in the name of driver safety that they did not race.
 
Premium
That day when you thought that F1 had reached the lowest level of credibility, not watching anymore because it looks fake to you and then they drop to a new low with a mockery of the sport and the championship with the ridiculous display this afternoon in Belgium.
3 laps behind a safety car, already knowing that would be all of it and we have a winner.
It would be sad if F1 was not already a joke, so no big deal, just an other act in the comedy that series has become.
I agree that F1 set a new standard for ridiculousness. Purely a legal action by F1 to check a box that the "race" was completed. No fans are falling for this. I would have understood a cancelled event but this action was a complete joke.

I was at an F4 event at Mid-Ohio last year and they took the green flag in the rain. Several cars went off on the first lap. The cars went around the track for a few laps under yellow before the race was stopped. No points were awarded at the end and there was no podium.
 
During his podium interview, Lewis stated: he hoped the fans get refunds. I would think the drivers could chip in a teeny tiny portion of their salaries and cover the cost of refunding the entire audience. After all, it was in the name of driver safety that they did not race.
Credit should go to Lewis and Vettel for bravely calling out the FIAs cynical decision making that prioritised the FIA/Liberty over sporting integrity. If they seriously wanted to give every change for a race they'd have kept them running for at least 45mins in case it gradually removed enough water, rather than abandon the attempt after 2 laps.

The drivers chipping in suggestion isn't really fair. They had no say in the situation, and even if they were in some way liable, a teeny portion of their salaries wouldn't cut it. Race tickets are hundreds of pounds and there were 75000 spectators, so you're talking £7.5m-15m to refund them all. No driver is paid enough to be able to ignore that kind of cash! Admittedly, Latifi and Stroll probably wouldn't notice if £15m went missing from their inheritance but they are very much the exception.
 
Last edited:
The "people on the ground" just made a mockery of the sport, and robbed fans who payed good money for tickets and broadcasts of a race, today, tomorrow, or any day.

We had a podium made of the qualy order, because they were so coward, they exploited their own rules to call it a race, after sitting on their hands waiting to stop raining, when it has been raining like that for two days, and weather forecasts werent saying it would improve today, and AFTER the kids ran an F3 race in similar conditions.

No amount of patting in the back will change that. You can play the "what ifs" game all you want, because i can play them too.

So if this is how it's going to be, fine. You and the FIA will just assume that F1 cant race in the wet and thats it, no need to argue about how much water is coming off the back of the cars, because that is after all subjective, and open to being influenced by who had most to gain at the particular moment.

This is my last reply to you. You know, a person can feel all these sentiments at the same time (and whether any of them don't align with your view is of no consequence):
1) Being upset that the F1 fans got ripped off by calling it "a race" and awarding championship points to drivers for 4 formation laps.
2) Being thankful that they didn't push for the F1 race to continue under such conditions.
3) Being thankful that the F3 race didn't end up with someone getting injured, killed or both.
4) Being upset that paying spectators got ripped off financially by not receiving refunds for the lack of an actual feature race.

Yes, my view is the F3 race going forward without any accidents does not mean it should have gone forward. If something was done in the past under certain conditions and nothing a particular person deems as "serious" happened, it doesn't mean that thing should continue to be done with no caution, regardless of the inherent danger of it. The fact that Lando survived his accident, does not mean that any further accidents that weekend in that weather would also be without any "serious" consequences.

There seems to be 3 issues here in question:
1) The time and money of F1 fans at the event and around the world
2) The integrity of F1 motorsport, the championship and its traditions
3) The safety of the drivers

"You and the FIA"..."Patting on the back"...no idea what you're on about, but let me be clear since you seem to have an axe to grind with me:

I couldn't give two s***s about F1's traditions if it means ripping off paying customers AND/OR putting drivers at unnecessary risk...and I pay to watch F1 every month. I pay to watch actual races happen. What I pay at home is a fraction of how much F1 tickets cost at these events (plus travel and housing). I am NOT HAPPY with what F1 did for its paying customers...but NOT in the way you seem to think. I was very much excited to see a wet race today, but not if those conditions were too hazardous.

There was a way for the FIA to satisfy all three things I pointed out above, but they only chose to satisfy safety of the drivers to suit their own personal gain (no refunds) and awarding points for not racing (no altering of logistics). Shuffling the calendar like they did last year, they could have raced at Spa later in the year and give spectators tickets to come back (and issue one time vouchers to all F1TV customers to watch the race online, should they opt to leave the service before the rescheduled race happens). I am all for fairness for all parties involved, but you keep labelling me as part of the problem...right.

As for your last paragraph, please read what I've been saying:

"Let the people on the ground in the thick of it (READ: THE FIA AND THE DRIVERS, INCLUDING THE SAFETY AND MEDICAL CAR PERSONNEL) weigh the risk vs. reward and do what's within a reasonable margin for error. I never said "DRY = LET'S RACE! SLIGHT DRIZZLE = DON'T RACE!"...but that's the narrative you keep pinning on me."

The FIA's action to be cautious was the right one, but their subsequent actions (race result, no refunds) were wrong. However, there's clearly no getting through to you since you're again making assumptions about me and my motives and not actually reading what I wrote...so I guess I'll now be also labelled as not only a "hypocrit" but a FIA fanboy or something similarly asinine? Before I respond to you in a way that would most definitely violate the terms of service, I'll end it here. Good day to you, sir.
 
Last edited:
This is my...
Well if you expect me to attack you just for the hell of it, i won't.

The only difference in opinion between you and me, is that i dont agree with the FIA that the race had no safety conditions. It had. And if they say the cars can't cope with it, they are either lying, or the cars are not WORSE than they used to be in those conditions, even as recently as 10 or 15 years ago.

Its my opinion that YES, they are pussy footing and being SCARED of having the responsibility of anybody getting hurt on them, and want to avoid it at all costs, sacrificing the very fabric of the sport in the process.

And please, dont play the victim when you were downplaying my opinion, because aparently, i am not an "expert", and i am "sitting at home". I can still see the spray, see the water, and compare it to races of old, and even a race in the same day, and draw my own conclusions.

I will leave it here also. Good day.
 
Its my opinion that YES, they are pussy footing and being SCARED of having the responsibility of anybody getting hurt on them, and want to avoid it at all costs, sacrificing the very fabric of the sport in the process.
Or maybe they remembered the 2014 Japanese GP, held in similar conditions, and what happened to Jules Bianchi.

I too think it was too dangerous to race in weather like that. The fact that it was done in the past doesn't justify doing it now. There was a time when races were held at tracks without guard rails, without fences, with trees right next to the track, etc. Then, people realized it wasn't a very good idea to do so. I think we've now realized that it's not a good idea to race in all kinds of weather.

And it's not sacrificing the fabric of the sport. Last time I checked, the fabric of the sport is not injuring or killing drivers.
 
Last edited:
Or maybe they remembered the 2014 Japanese GP, held in similar conditions, and what happened to Jules Bianchi.

I too think it was too dangerous to race in weather like that. The fact that it was done in the past doesn't justify doing it now. There was a time when races were held at tracks without guard rails, without fences, with trees right next to the track, etc. Then, people realized it wasn't a very good idea to do so. I think we've now realized that it's not a good idea to race in all kinds of weather.

And it's not sacrificing the fabric of the sport. Last time I checked, the fabric of the sport is not injuring or killing drivers.
Fine, so we are done racing in the wet in F1?

So legendary performances like Portugal 85, Suzuka 94, donington 93, spain 96, Monza 2008 and upsets like Monaco 96 or Spa 98 Or Brazil 2008 are a thing of the past now?

Because that is basically what you are saying. Because how do they decide if its too wet, so so wet, just a little wet, or not wet at all? And They only start the race if its not raining?

These events are part of the fabric of the sport yes.

And like i said, if the cars can't cope, its time to rethink the cars, not change the sport.
 
Fine, so we are done racing in the wet in F1?

So legendary performances like Portugal 85, Suzuka 94, donington 93, spain 96, Monza 2008 and upsets like Monaco 96 or Spa 98 Or Brazil 2008 are a thing of the past now?

Because that is basically what you are saying. Because how do they decide if its too wet, so so wet, just a little wet, or not wet at all? And They only start the race if its not raining?

These events are part of the fabric of the sport yes.

And like i said, if the cars can't cope, its time to rethink the cars, not change the sport.
We're not done racing in the wet, just done racing in extreme conditions like today.

How do they decide when to race or not? Did you watch the safety car before the race? That's how they decide. That and drivers input.

At some point, enough is enough. If drivers say it's too dangerous to drive, that's enough for me. I'm not the one in the car who's risking his life.

(By the way, Donington 1993 was nowhere near as bad as this morning.)
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Mike Smith
Article read time
3 min read
Views
18,361
Comments
212
Last update

What's needed for simracing in 2024?

  • More games, period

  • Better graphics/visuals

  • Advanced physics and handling

  • More cars and tracks

  • AI improvements

  • AI engineering

  • Cross-platform play

  • New game Modes

  • Other, post your idea


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top