Assetto Corsa Competizione to add GT2 Pack


The 2022 SRO Motorsport Annual Press Conference saw some special information released for sim racers. President of SRO Stephané Ratel surprisingly announced an upcoming GT2 expansion for ACC, which was later confirmed by Marco Massarutto, Executive Manager at Kunos Simulazioni.

Confirmed Content for ACC in 2023​

Not only was the GT2 pack teased, but it was also announced that the 2023 update will include all the new GT3 vehicles in 2023, namely:
  • Ferrari 296 GT3
  • Lamborghini Huracán Evo (Evo Evo)
  • Porsche 911 GT3 R (992)
The exclusion of not mentioning any new race tracks doesn't mean no new tracks would be included, however, just like the 2020 pack included Imola.

The Surprising Announcement of the GT2 Pack​

In all his excitement, shortly after the Fanatec presentation, Ratel announced: "... and I'm very happy because I heard, maybe now you are (going to) do the GT2..."

In Kunos' own presentation, just a few minutes later, Massarutto confirmed this surprising announcement. He exclaimed: "The decision to produce also the GT2 pack, actually, has been taken yesterday so it was not a story to be told today."

With this, it's now officially confirmed that the decision has been made to work on the GT2 pack.

RD_GT2_list.jpg

ACC's Future Beyond the GT2 Pack​

Massarutto further said: "The final decision to include also the GT2 pack has been also inspired by Maserati with a new car that is beautiful. So we believe that will be a great pack for Assetto Corsa Competizione, maybe to say goodbye, we don't know, but just wait."

This means that Kunos' don't even know if ACC will keep being developed alongside the long-awaited Assetto Corsa 2. Judging by the size of Kunos' development team, it would be a tough job to develop 2 AAA games side by side.

So what do you think about this announcement? Let us know in the comments down below!
About author
Julian Strasser
Motorsports and Maker-stuff enthusiast. Part time jack-of-all-trades. Owner of tracc.eu, a sim racing-related service provider and its racing community.

Comments

It's a shame they seem to be closing the door on ACC with so many SRO tracks not in the game. I'll pick up the GT2 pack, as I have all the previous ones, but I really want more tracks. I was really hoping they would add the missing US tracks, and then move on to the Asia and Australian tracks to fully represent the World Challenge schedules.
 
I'm guessing they do it because they take profit(?). But it only takes a couple of minuts in the server list to find out that no one is using GT4 for example (a DLC that was quite expensive back in time), or the new tracks added. You won't find more than 1 server full with a no DLC track).
So why would someone keep buying packs that you're unable to use online for the lack of players?
Maybe I'm missing something here.
XV
The only thing you're missing is that a number of us prefer racing offline for whatever reasons. I truly enjoy GT4s on the smaller tracks such as Oulton and Brand's Hatch. It's great fun. Also, the GT4s drive and feel differently than the GT3s. It provides a nice variety for those of us who race primarily against the AI.
 
I'm guessing they do it because they take profit(?). But it only takes a couple of minuts in the server list to find out that no one is using GT4 for example (a DLC that was quite expensive back in time), or the new tracks added. You won't find more than 1 server full with a no DLC track).
So why would someone keep buying packs that you're unable to use online for the lack of players?
Maybe I'm missing something here.
XV
Because I race offline
 
I'm guessing they do it because they take profit(?). But it only takes a couple of minuts in the server list to find out that no one is using GT4 for example (a DLC that was quite expensive back in time), or the new tracks added. You won't find more than 1 server full with a no DLC track).
So why would someone keep buying packs that you're unable to use online for the lack of players?
Maybe I'm missing something here.
XV
I can't speak for other people but I don't play online so I'll get a lot from the addition of more cars and a new class :)
 
I'm guessing they do it because they take profit(?). But it only takes a couple of minuts in the server list to find out that no one is using GT4 for example (a DLC that was quite expensive back in time), or the new tracks added. You won't find more than 1 server full with a no DLC track).
So why would someone keep buying packs that you're unable to use online for the lack of players?
Maybe I'm missing something here.
XV
ACC is still incredibly popular so KS is producing more content. Most people interested in AC & ACC don't care about racing online, as is evident by the lack of servers. So who's buying up all the DLC packs? Pretty obvious.
Of course KS are doing it to make profit, but also because they love what they do and they do it very well. Those things are not mutually exclusive.
 
While I think GT2 is a weird unnecessary curiosity in real life, I may enjoy these cars in sim. I tend to enjoy driving the older GT3s in ACC with less aero, more straight line speed, and less sophisticated TC/ABS, and I believe the GT2 cars are more like this.

Honestly, I'd prefer tracks and cars to complete the existing incomplete DLC they released. For tracks, the rest of the 2021 European schedule (Magny Cours, Ricardo Tormo) and the rest of the American schedule. And for cars, I'd love the Mustang GT4 and Jag F-Type GT4 that competed in 2019 British GT, but were not included in the DLC.

I'm guessing a combo of licensing costs and physical track access (given COVID restrictions) are at the root of why these things weren't done in the first place, but I'd love to see it. Far more than GT2 content, honestly.
 
Haven't done as much as I should with ACC, but the Brabs & new 296 should make the price worthwhile just by themselves.
 
I understand why they're doing it since its basically just a question of adding more power, but I'd rather see that gem of a physics engine translated into Hypercar territory. It would change the whole endurance simracing world.
While this prospect is salivating they probably need the teams to finish their cars.
Of the big guns only Toyota and Peugeot(only just) have officially launched contenders... Ferrari, Porsche, BMW... all still testing haven't taken part in any event.
 
Last edited:
The only thing you're missing is that a number of us prefer racing offline for whatever reasons. I truly enjoy GT4s on the smaller tracks such as Oulton and Brand's Hatch. It's great fun. Also, the GT4s drive and feel differently than the GT3s. It provides a nice variety for those of us who race primarily against the AI.
I agree with this.
I also enjoy the Porsche Cup races offline even, the older Porsche Cup cars, I just wish we had the ability of using better liveries than those selected by the game in the cup races.
Best wishes
Bob
 
Premium
While this prospect is salivating they probably need the teams to finish their cars.
Of the big guns only Toyota and Pegeout(only just) have officially launched contenders... Ferrari, Porsche, BMW... all still testing haven't taken part in any event.
Just base the first cars off of the Toyota and Glickenhaus, the rest can be DLC'd later. Would require the license from both though.
 
Last edited:

Latest News

Article information

Author
Julian Strasser
Article read time
2 min read
Views
43,443
Comments
76
Last update

What's needed for simracing in 2024?

  • More games, period

  • Better graphics/visuals

  • Advanced physics and handling

  • More cars and tracks

  • AI improvements

  • AI engineering

  • Cross-platform play

  • New game Modes

  • Other, post your idea


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top