by a hair's breadth
Well in fact.. we've never had a situation like this. Andretti's results are a little bit better than each Matra driver (once 9th, twice 10th) BUT both Honda's results are a little bit worse than both Matra results (once 9th for Honda, twice 9th for Matra)Why did Matra drop to 4?
He says, having won 3 drivers' and 3 constructors' titles in that timeWow, 3 dnfs for me and only 1 for Tobi on the same reliability.. really the last 7 seasons I can't catch a break
Only because Clark is amazing.He says, having won 3 drivers' and 3 constructors' titles in that time
Clark is amazing indeed. But you win some, you lose some. I had 2 seasons were I lost the title with both drivers, each of them only missing a few points.Only because Clark is amazing.
1963 was close because Graham had 1 less DNF (2 less entering the final race)
1964 was close because Von Trips had 1 less DNF
1965 would have been a lot closer with equal DNFs, but Clark had 1 more
1966 was lost on the DNF in the final race which dropped me to tier 2 (again, Clark had 1 more)
1968 was close because we had the same.. but I had better reliability by 15%
1969 I'll be in tier 2 with the PP you and Lotus have rn
Edit: could even say 1967 was close because Ferrari had 4 less DNFs but I did have very bad reliability then, if Clark had an extra one I could have spent 1968 in tier 2 as well.. with Lotus who had 9000 PP