I find it dubious, if we first vote publicly and after all or most of the votes are given, arbitrarily decide, whose vote counts. I guess we should have announced before voting which criteria defines, who is eligible to vote. As we didn't do like this, it would be fair to decide that all the votes count?
What is doubious? That I am the only one who cry out when we receive votes outside the parameters we agreed before voting?
We said votes from those who plan to race season 10 would be eligeble, thus Henrik's is not as he has not confirmed his participation.
Helder came in from the side-line (we had not agreed what to do in such an event), I asked if his vote should be counted or not before I knew what it was. 100% of those who replied said yes, thus, Helder's vote counts.
So that is it, we count all votes except Henrik's, that is the most fair thing to do, that is what we agreed before voting and if anyone think this vote is unfair they should say so now before the results are revield.