Should DRS be removed from Formula 1?

Should DRS go_.jpg

What are your thoughts on DRS?


  • Total voters
    801
With two races out of the way, we have experienced the new 2022 regulations and how the cars race. Should the Drag Reduction System (DRS) be removed from Formula 1 or be kept?

The 2022 regulations were a massive overhaul of the car regulations. The 2022 regulations which were originally slated for 2021 but were delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic and have one major principle to allow cars to race closer.

With previous regulations, a following car would lose 35% of their downforce when racing within 20 metres of the car ahead. That loss of downforce could increase to 47% if the following car got within 10 metres of the car ahead.

The new regulations are meant to reduce the downforce lost and from what we have seen so far, the new regulations appear to work.

So now that we know cars are able to drive closer to each other, should we remove DRS?

Drag Reduction System (DRS) was introduced to F1 in 2011. DRS was implemented as a tool to allow cars to overtake. It is essentially an adjustable rear wing that is operated by the driver. DRS has strict conditions where the racing conditions must be safe and the pursuing car must be within a one second gap of the car in front as it crosses the DRS detection zone.

When it was introduced, it was met with a mixed reaction. Some thought it to be the solution to a lack of overtaking, whilst others thought it made overtaking too easy. Now that we appear to have cars that can drive closer to each other, surely this makes overtaking even easier?

Bahrain 2022​

During the first race of the season, we saw Charles Leclerc and Max Verstappen battling for the lead - before Max had to retire. During this race we appeared to see the immense advantage Max had over Charles along the start/finish straight. At times, Max was just within the one second gap that is required to activate DRS, yet was able to get to T1 first. However, DRS wasn’t quite as powerful as it first appeared here. After the race Charles Leclerc stated that he allowed Max to close the gap along the start/finish straight, so that he had DRS immediately after - which allowed him to hold onto the lead.

Bahrain DRS.jpg


Saudi Arabia 2022​

The second race of the season was at Jeddah and this is where we say a very peculiar thing indeed. Whilst battling for the lead, we saw Charles and Max both hit the brakes hard before entering the DRS detection zone for the start/finish straight. It would appear that whoever entered the final corner first would be at a massive disadvantage and could be easily overtaken. So the result saw both drivers braking heavily, trying to be the second car to enter the final corner. But, this race was more than just the DRS zones, it showed how well these cars can follow each other. Both the Ferrari and Red Bull were able to follow each other closely through most of the lap, which was not so easy in 2021 with the previous F1 regulations.

Jeddah DRS.jpg


Calls for a change to DRS​

Many fans have started to call for a change to the DRS rules and those calls for a change could be amplified further with this week’s race at Albert Park. The Australian GP has an unprecedented 4 DRS zones, one along the main straight, another between turns 2 and 3, the third between turns 8 and 9, and the fourth between turns 10 and 11.

Australia DRS.jpg


Here are our thoughts on some potential options for 2022.

Remove DRS completely. If DRS were to be removed completely, then there will be one certainty - less overtaking. DRS is there to help overtaking, so completely removing it will have an impact on the amount of overtakes that are seen during a race. Also, removing DRS will expose how well the F1 2022 regulation cars actually follow each other. There is also the cost to take into account as each team has a budget cap.

If DRS were to be removed, the rear wings may have to keep the DRS function for the remainder of the season. It also may not be as simple as removing the adjustable flap, as these wings will most definitely have been designed to optimise DRS in some way and so may need a complete redesign.
  • Pros - Real overtaking
  • Cons - Less overtaking and potential cost implication
Restrict the use of DRS. The main disadvantage of DRS is that it gives the driver behind an advantage over the driver ahead. However, this could be eradicated if the DRS detection zones were removed and drivers were allowed to use DRS whenever they liked - still with designated DRS zones. This would provide the driver ahead to have a way to defend from an overtaking car. It could also be used by drivers who are attempting to complete an over or undercut, by using DRS to put in a fast lap whilst other drivers are pitting.

The caveat to this is that there would be a limited number of times any one driver could activate DRS during a race.
  • Pros - allows driver ahead to defend and tactical use of DRS
  • Cons - still doesn’t address DRS being potentially overpowered
Leave it as it is. Whilst we are only two races into the season, removing DRS or changing the way it is utilised could be potentially unfair. There were 77 overtakes in Bahrain and 33 overtakes in Saudi Arabia - the majority of these overtakes would have been with the aid of DRS. This means that DRS is already a factor to the amount of points certain drivers have been rewarded and this includes Max Verstappen who may not have won the race at Jeddah without DRS.

Love it or hate it, DRS does provide more opportunities to overtake and without DRS there will be less overtaking. Less overtaking could have an impact on the global audience, especially affecting the audience who have only known F1 with DRS. A result of this could mean an impact on F1 financially - with less fans watching F1 and fewer companies willing to invest in the motorsport.

Finally, leaving DRS as it is allows the FIA to evaluate the entire season and to properly formulate a plan for 2023, if they chose to change DRS in some way in the future.

What are your thoughts about DRS? Should we keep it, change it, or leave it?
About author
Damian Reed
PC geek, gamer, content creator, and passionate sim racer.
I live life a 1/4 mile at a time, it takes me ages to get anywhere!

Comments

I have actually always been against "artificial competition" using various technological means with one sole purpose of maintaining a high popularity for the widest possible audience (money laundering).

But I have to admit, that I think the Saudi Grand Prix DRS detection zone just before the last corner 27 generated some nice and funny spice to the race.

Had it not been for that experience it would've been a clear 'remove it', but now I went with 'change it'.

But OK, recent decade we've witnessed more experiments mid season, so why not just try it out for 2-3 GP's without any kind of DRS and let's see what the new car designs and drivers can deliver without artificial entertainment.
 
Last edited:
Make DRS usable for drivers more than 1 second behind, and not usable less than 1 second behind. This would make everyone to race closer.
 
It takes away the real fighting on the track, that is just a fact! And brings that kind of playing what we saw during last GP, Verstappen and Leclerc on DRS line. F1 should be flat out racing from start to finish.

I think i would keep the DRS, but change the way it is used. Now you can use it if you are less than one second away from driver in front.

Maybe it should be like, yes keep the one second gap, but allow to use DRS after if you can follow the car in front like three laps. So it brings up the possible real fight about position, until use DRS. Maybe even if you catch a car in front, you get inside three seconds gap, next lap have to be inside two seconds gap, and third lap it is one second gap.

So it wouldnt be just like. Oh i did catch you! Hahaa now i open my wing and BOOM!!! Bye bye.. There you see, some skills! :thumbsdown:
 
I'm not reading all the comments, so maybe someone else said this. I'm fine with DRS. Just like brakes and a steering wheel, every car has it. My problem comes with the limits on its use.

1. If a driver passes the DRS Detection Line within one second of the car ahead, but passes that car before the activation line, then DRS can't be used.
2. One DRS Detection Line should not be used for two DRS Activation Zones. See Australia, where this happens twice. And if the car manages to overtake before the second DRS Activation Line, then DRS can't be used. See Mexico. One Detection Line inside the stadium lasts through T4, which is basically ALL of Sector One.
3. The DRS Detection Line should be well ahead of the expected braking zone for the corner. That way, you can't slow down unnecessarily early just to get the advantage. Compare T27 Jeddah with T10 Canada.
4. Increase minimum gap from 1sec to 1.5 or even 2sec. Some cars using DRS end up gaining more than 1 second over that lap. I find it very strange when a car can be sitting behind another for many many laps, but once they have DRS and overtake, they are gone in less than one lap.
5. DRS should not be available for over half of the lap. At that rate, just have it on or off full time. See. Austria.
 
Keep DRS, unban everything that is banned, stop banning things, keep regulations at minimum (as "all cars should have X P/W Ratio"), let race drivers be race drivers and get ready for the ultimate amazingness!
 
I voted to get rid of it. I find it confusing, which takes some the joy of watching racing. If it's changed to avoid confusion, I'd reconsider, but I think racing at this level should come to skill, not trickery.
 
Last edited:
Indy car is a spec series, cars will always be close in performance, depending on setups and drivers.
F1 is a formula, where teams can demonstrably build quite different cars that are unlikely to be so nearly matched as Indy Cars, which makes F1 interesting for different reasons
but needs more drastic tricks for close racing.
- Indy(& by Indy I mean Champ Cars-CART) wasn't always a spec series. Prior to the late 90's you could have 3 or different chassis builders, 3 or 4 engines, and development was fair game. Heck they had Jet cars at Indy & tire wars. Bobby Rahal's team even built their own turbo to try and separate from other teams with the same engine. Champcar became a spec series when they were fighting for their life vs the IRL. The IRL itself started with several different chassis & Engine options but it only took a couple of years for the best superspeedway (Indy 500) option to make the IRL a spec series in practice as everyone went for...I think it was the Dallara.(much like the Oreca LMP2 taking over that category)
 
Eventually yes, it should be removed. That time isn't now though. Car wake, tires and tracks all need to be to the right place before DRS can go. They've made an improvement with the cars this year, but the tires are still baking too quickly to really follow and fight for long periods of time.
That said, with these '22 car I think F1 could shorten some DRS zones, since cars can follow a little closer thru the corners. DRS was too powerful in Bahrain and Jeddah imo. As for 4 DRS zones in Australia, I honestly don't think adding a 4th zone helps in the slightest.
 
Last edited:
It makes the drivers' lazy so get rid. Drivers will not attempt to go up the inside or try a dodgy move in an attempt to pass when they can simply press a button to pass on the straight. IMHO it takes the "Racing" out of racing driver and makes defending your position impossible. Soon they will be introducing "Piss" stops so the drivers can get out and go to the toilet. Let's just get back to good old racing where it was racecraft (Skill) and big balls that made you a race winner.
 
If they could find a way where the drs could deactivate when you pull alongside the rear tyre of the car ahead then I think this could be worth looking into.

You'd still have some residual speed advantage to finish pulling alongside then its down to the driver to finish the move once they get level.

I think it's too OP where the DRS is open for the full length of the DRS zone (or until you lift/brake)
 
Keep it, but use it like in Indy. Attack and defend anywhere but limit the number of times it can be used.
That is potentially very dangerous.
Say a driver opens DRS after La Source, heading down to Eau Rouge but forgets to close it for the corner - that could lead to a massive accident, since the rear end of the car will not have a big chunk of the downforce available when DRS is closed.

So P2P option which gives more power for a limited time like in Indycar would be more appropriate, because it doesn't mess up the car's aero balance.
 
Watch any race from the 80s / 90s completely from beginning to end for a couple of hours, you realise that in recent years there have been so many fantastic races in F1.

Damn there are so many people with rose tinted glasses about the past, who love to moan. For all the decades I’ve been watching F1, I’ve never seen it in such good health. Leave DRS as it is, it’s fine, it’s the same for all drivers.
 
Not sure... Would FIA change anything, listening to our comments, here at Race Department ?? Maybe.. :whistling:
Back in the day people chatted about sport in pubs...did the organisers ever get to hear what was said? Nope, did the people discussing it care? Nope.
 
It should be free to use at all times.

Just like fathers of modern motorsport aerodynamics did it at the very beginning. I speak about Michael May and Jim Hall.

DSC2076-1.jpg

Chaparral-2G.jpg


All these rules just makes motorsport unnecessary complicated and stupid.

Not to mention than downforce ever since late 80s has been used to curb racecars, so that they wouldn't be too fast, and way too many chicanes has been introduced destroying most of the straights and sequences of highspeed curves.

Boomers... They had fun, and then spoiled everything for upcoming generations.
Boomers, died in their droves racing, and then didn't want future generations to suffer as they did.
 
Do the anti-DRS folks realize it only exists because the original “unfair” advantage is from the leading car messing up the air flow behind it.

Perhaps you can trim it down, but to eliminate it artificially prohibits passing since the faster can’t can’t actually be faster when it is trailing.
That's the entire reason of the new regulations....to reduce that dirty air. Cars can follow more close now, overtakes should be about skill not pressing a button. And when you have drivers going slow in a race purely because of DRS, then it needs to go.
 
With F1 is people tend to remember races as being a lot more exciting than they actually were.....DRS or not.

I think the only way to make the series more exciting is to find a way to level up the rest of field, a bit like MotoGP and the top 20 being with 1s of each other in qualifying. I remember when lower tier bikes would be 6s a lap down.

The problem is cars aren't bikes the ways of going faster are tenfold and harder to police. That and those at the top start kicking and screaming when moves get talked about to make things more equal.
MGP is awesomely close now, makes it impossible to predict and that makes it so much better as a neutral. Who'd have thunk Aprillia would win a race?!!!! The concessions system is brilliant too, the worse you do the more testing and development you are allowed to do, F1 should definitely follow that system IMO. Reminds me of the "draft" system in the NFL. Do crap and you get the early picks of the best college players....Bengals went from barely winning for two years then the into the Superbowl and only "just" lost.
 
Someone above (can't remember now) mentioned braking zones....and that's also a large part of the problem with overtaking (apart from dirty air). F1 brakes are TOO good, there's almost no real chance to outbrake someone when the tolerance for it is in the milliseconds. Make the brakes smaller to increase the stopping distance and allow for more outbraking manouvers.
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Damian Reed
Article read time
5 min read
Views
20,245
Comments
146
Last update

What's needed for simracing in 2024?

  • More games, period

  • Better graphics/visuals

  • Advanced physics and handling

  • More cars and tracks

  • AI improvements

  • AI engineering

  • Cross-platform play

  • New game Modes

  • Other, post your idea


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top