F1's Chicago Plans: Another Street Track That Could Eliminate An Iconic Venue

F1-Street-Tracks-Trend-1024x576.jpg
Shortly after announcing the move from Catalunya to Madrid, rumors of another F1 street track joining the calendar are circulating. The possible Chicago circuit could spell bad news for real-life Formula One fans as well as for the EA Sports game series.

Image credit: Getty Images / Red Bull Content Pool

There are certain icons in any sport that are simply immovable objects, and racing is no different. Sometimes, there are even multiple examples. IndyCar’s crown jewel races include the Indy 500, Long Beach and Road America. NASCAR would be unthinkable without Daytona, Talladega or Charlotte. The same goes for the World Rally Championship and Rally Finland or Rally Monte Carlo.

Formula One has more than one of these icons, too. There is the undisputed trademark at Monaco, although the races themselves tend to be rather uninspiring these days. The Italian Grand Prix at Monza is almost as legendary. Silverstone has a comparable status for the British Grand Prix. And who could forget the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps on their list of the F1 Icons Trifecta?

F1 Street Tracks: Chicago Could Be Next​

Well, it would seem that the latter might not be around too much longer. Rumors of this are nothing new, but Spa has reportedly inked a deal to host F1 until 2025. The classic Ardennes circuit is a favorite of both drivers and fans, being extremely challenging and spectacular at the same time.

However, shortly after the news of a Madrid street circuit replacing Barcelona-Catalunya as the Spanish Grand Prix venue was met with little enthusiasm from fans, the next track of this kind seems to be waiting in the wings. Reportedly, F1 is flirting with the idea of hosting yet another street race, this time in Chicago. This would make it the fourth Grand Prix in the United States, should the current US races at COTA, Miami and Las Vegas stay on the calendar.

As the schedule is already near the limit of what is possible at 24 races, another event being on the chopping block would seem likely. As Spa only received one-year contract extensions in recent years, it could be a candidate to meet said chopping block.


F1 Street Tracks In The US: Not The First Foray​

This, in turn, would mean that once this change takes place, the official F1 game would lose a classic circuit. In its place would be yet another modern street track. Looking towards 2026, there would be six of these that joined the calendar since Liberty Media took over the reigns.

Of course, F1 is a business first and foremost, and pretending it is too focused on money only since Liberty Media came in would simply be ignorant. It has always been a sport for those with big bank accounts, and it is not even the first time there were multiple street circuits in the US. In fact, the 1984 season even had two consecutive Stateside street races, with the Dallas Grand Prix following the Detroit Grand Prix in the middle of the year.

Multiple Alternatives​

What makes this current street circuit craze so frustrating from a racing fan’s perspective, however, is that there are so many circuits out there that would be worthy of hosting a GP. Sure, it may be idealistic, but venues such as Mugello, Portimão, Hockenheim or the Nürburgring would be much more popular in many fans’ book.

In fact, when Red Bull brought multiple older F1 cars to the Red Bull Formula event happening alongside the NLS 12 Hours in September 2023, the ‘Ring was absolutely packed with fans – even more so than for the actual endurance race that weekend.

Red-Bull-Formula-Nurburgring-2023-1024x683.jpg

Formula One cars still draw people to the Nürburgring, as Red Bull Formula Nürburgring 2023 impressively showed. Image credit: Philip Platzer / Red Bull Content Pool

Then you have the Kyalami Grand Prix circuit, which is still hoping to make its return after last hosting F1 in 1993. It would also be the only race held in Africa, the only continent not currently on the calendar. From 1967 to 1985, Kyalami was among the most popular races each season.

Plus, there is a certain irony in this quest for making Formula One an enormous deal in the United States. Four races, three on them on uninspired street circuits? Sure, no problem. But arguably the biggest name in US racing in Andretti, backed by one of the biggest car manufacturers in the world in General Motors? No, thank you, “we do not believe that the applicant would be a competitive participant.”

F1 Street Tracks: Show Over Racing?​

Should the trend indeed continue, it would be reflected in the EA Sports F1 series, too. Players would get to race at less iconic venues and more very similar street circuits. Newcomers in particular might miss out on great circuits in favor of tracks that are surely challenging and spectacular in some cases, but also sometimes appear to treat the racing aspect of the actual event as a bit of a side note. And that is not what the pinnacle of motorsport should be about, in the author’s humble opinion.

It is also not the case that street circuits are bad per se. Tracks like Adelaide (particularly in its longer layout used in 2000), Long Beach or, to add a more modern example, Baku show that the opposite is true. And even the new breed of street circuits may be fun to drive in games and sims - but them potentially coming in at the expense of a classic venue is a bitter pill to swallow.

Luckily, sim racers can create their own calendars in other titles quite easily. If you think 24 races are too many, you can run a championship on a smaller calendar just as well. Want to substitute a track or two? There is nothing stopping you from doing just that in Assetto Corsa or rFactor 2.

Not Everything Was Better "Back In My Day", Either​

Most F1 fans are not hardcore sim racers, though, so their main point of contact would be the official F1 game. The thought of a new generation growing up on these games and possibly not learning about the icons that made the sport what it is today is weird, to say the least.

I realize that this article may feel like “back in my day, everything was better”. That certainly is not the intention, even though F1 was much more appealing to me personally. Even in the much-revered V10 era, there were some headscratchers, like 2005’s rule that a tire set had to last for the full race or the road course configuration of Indianapolis from 2000 to 2007.

Everyone’s opinion is different, of course. Maybe you agree, maybe you think that the schedule and its development is fine as it is. Feel free to share your ideal F1 schedules in the comments or tell us your opinion on Twitter @OverTake_gg!
About author
Yannik Haustein
Lifelong motorsport enthusiast and sim racing aficionado, walking racing history encyclopedia.

Sim racing editor, streamer and one half of the SimRacing Buddies podcast (warning, German!).

Heel & Toe Gang 4 life :D

Comments

Unless I can actually get lap times from those vintages events, it's kind of moot. Also, the drivers may be pushing to the limits of their abilities, but that doesn't mean the cars are at their limits.
Attend some of those events. Or better, compete in them.
 
Attend some of those events. Or better, compete in them.
Vintage racing is not a good way to compare anything, because they dont run the same tires they did back in the day. Nor the same setups, and some of them, not even the same engines, specially if we are talking F1.
 
I suggest you peruse the rules for true vintage/historic racing.
For example, FIA regs state -
"... it has to be the exact same engine that was used in period on the model."

True, there are series with a near "anything goes" attitude; you can drop a twin turbo 5L Ford V8 in your '90 Ferrari F1 chassis and have fun ...but that will not be allowed in a true historic event. The same with tires; Goodyear, Firestone, Pirelli, and several smaller manufacturers produce reproduction period tires - the proper tread and sidewall construction using period compounds ...and they are not cheap.

To make optimum use of modern tires on such cars requires too much modification of the suspension, which negates the historic aspect of the car. I read an article a while back about how to rebuild a TR-3 front end using Toyota and Nissan parts so it will have the camber range to use modern radial tires; this is legal for SCCA but would not be allowed in SVRA or HRS.
 
I suggest you peruse the rules for true vintage/historic racing.
For example, FIA regs state -
"... it has to be the exact same engine that was used in period on the model."

True, there are series with a near "anything goes" attitude; you can drop a twin turbo 5L Ford V8 in your '90 Ferrari F1 chassis and have fun ...but that will not be allowed in a true historic event. The same with tires; Goodyear, Firestone, Pirelli, and several smaller manufacturers produce reproduction period tires - the proper tread and sidewall construction using period compounds ...and they are not cheap.

To make optimum use of modern tires on such cars requires too much modification of the suspension, which negates the historic aspect of the car. I read an article a while back about how to rebuild a TR-3 front end using Toyota and Nissan parts so it will have the camber range to use modern radial tires; this is legal for SCCA but would not be allowed in SVRA or HRS.
Same "engine" doesnt mean same tuning, nor even totally original parts. Believe me, i know this very well.

Those period tires are just aproximations. They have MUCH MORE grip than the tires of the eras of old, and they are much stiffer and much more precise, which in turn makes the setups of today's historic cars a lot stiffer than back in the day, and you can see this clearly by comparing footage of the era, or even pictures.

As for F1s, anything post 92 or 93 is basically super expensive to even keep running, much less go on historic racing.


Using modern vintage racing to judge anything period is totally useless.
 
Last edited:
Using modern vintage racing to judge anything period is totally useless.

Do not confuse "historic" racing as depicted in GTL, FIA sanctioned but allowing modern suspension and tires and brakes, with actual historic racing as done by SVRA.

I competed from '85 to '07, it's a world of difference between an SCCA historic and an SVRA historic.
 
Attend some of those events. Or better, compete in them.
Given my (lack of) eyesight, I'm not allowed a road license, so competing myself is out of the question. And I need someone else to do the several hundred miles of driving each way to get to and from Road America or Mid Ohio to attend an event.

(It's Optic Nerve damage, btw, which means, just like with brain and spinal tissue, it doesn't just regenerate on its own if you lose it.)
 
F1 is not 'it' any more. WEC is where it's at. I'm dumping my Sky sub in July at contract end and will watch WEC (was my first full season as a fan last year and I luvved it!) instead. Could do with a couple more events and a UK track so I can go and watch a race trackside - but in the meantime BTCC will fill the pauses (and international rugby!).
Still fully support the F1 drivers and been watching all races since retiring from the military in 1989. That's over from July. I have a huge catalogue of recorded races that will be more fun to watch.
 
Current rally cars are more powerful then the Group Bs ;)
Yeah but group B were cooler and the Audi Quattro have the best sound of any rally car ever

And well back in the 80’s the group b cars indeed had tech on the level if not even above the f1 from the same era, I’m not sure about the current Rally1 cars in comparison with current f1 cars
 
Premium
Yeah but group B were cooler and the Audi Quattro have the best sound of any rally car ever

And well back in the 80’s the group b cars indeed had tech on the level if not even above the f1 from the same era, I’m not sure about the current Rally1 cars in comparison with current f1 cars
It's hard to argue against the Quattro yeah.

But the thing with Rally1 cars is that they need no homologation, they're using fancy hybrid engines with regenerative braking (that F1 also has), they have space frame chassis, that sorta thing. That being said, there's also a bunch of cost-cutting restrictions based on the designs that you didn't see with Group B - but then again, you see those in F1 nowadays as well.

Not sure if Group B was ever above 80s formula 1, isn't that the ground effect era?
 
Last edited:
It's hard to argue against the Quattro yeah.

But the thing with Rally1 cars is that they need no homologation, they're using fancy hybrid engines with regenerative braking (that F1 also has), they have space frame chassis, that sorta thing. That being said, there's also a bunch of cost-cutting restrictions based on the designs that you didn't see with Group B - but then again, you see those in F1 nowadays as well.

Not sure if Group B was ever above 80s formula 1, isn't that the ground effect era?
Group B was at the time F1 banned ground effect
 
There is one instance of CART and F1 overlapping on the same track using the identical 2.709-mile layout, namely Montreal in 2003.

CART Pole Time: 1:19.665
CART Fastest Lap: 1:20.634

F1 Pole Time: 1:15.529
F1 Fastest Lap: 1:16.040

Note the 100 kg difference in weight, with F1 cars being lighter at just 600 kg compared to the 700 kg Champ Cars, which were technologically way behind F1. Pretty interesting to have this direct comparison on a road course, and just two months apart - the Canadian Grand Prix happened on June 15, the Molson Indy Toronto was held on August 24.
For what is worth, CART cars were slowed down since 2001, 2000 was their peak of speed. The pole at Road America was 4 seconds faster than at 2003. It would need some data extrapolation, which is very hard to do and get reliable data, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if by year 2000 CART cars were not faster than F1s on a road course. It wouldn't last ofc, F1 shot speeds up massively since the following year.
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Yannik Haustein
Article read time
5 min read
Views
5,987
Comments
92
Last update

What would make you race in our Club events

  • Special events

    Votes: 82 29.2%
  • More leagues

    Votes: 57 20.3%
  • Prizes

    Votes: 60 21.4%
  • Trophies

    Votes: 35 12.5%
  • Forum trophies

    Votes: 18 6.4%
  • Livestreams

    Votes: 44 15.7%
  • Easier access

    Votes: 144 51.2%
  • Other? post your reason

    Votes: 42 14.9%
Back
Top