I want a real career mode that has proper consequences ie.crashes injuries death. Anything else is arcade.
I was gonna add, it looks like the Cinemaware artists found a home;If it's done well then yes not adverse to it.
With an imagination (remember those) you can do it yourself anyway...
Back in the day of Amiga's and Commodores you HAD to have an imagination.
I used to play GC F1 and made up stories and back stories etc..loved it...... i was a kid so not as bad as it sounds...
View attachment 297289
I very much doubt that Ron Dennis saw a black guy doing well at golf and thought he could pick some random black kid and he'd be brilliant at motor racing, that's very far fetched and more than a little racist. You don't just throw million of pounds at a kid under the assumption that black people are better at sports than white people.
The fact is Tiger Woods was a good golfer, Lewis Hamilton is a good driver because they put the work in.
I do think you could turn just about anybody into a decent driver with training but it's another level of dedication and talent to become the best in your field.
So what you are saying is:I want a real career mode that has proper consequences ie.crashes injuries death. Anything else is arcade.
Motorsports are expensive for sure. My dad tried out for a motorsport team back in the early 80s and though apparently he was te best applicant he was unable to follow trough because they were looking for money and talent. And my father was not a poor man by any standards at the time.[/QUOTEa
Bit disingenuous that... Lewis's myth is of a poor upbringing but truth is his Dad had 3 business's but ultimately from 12 he was Ron Dennis's pet project so he had plenty of cash and support....
Ocon isn't racing in F1 anymore due to money (so proves my point)...but his parents may not be 200 million rich but they aren't poor either...
Maldonardo was backed by his government.
Even Senna (rich parents) needed money from Brazil, but at least he was humble....
To even get into karting at aged 7 you need serious investment. 100k a year upwards.
You can simply pay for better kit, training, mechanics.....on and on....
When I wrote that some drivers didn’t come from wealthy families, I didn’t mean they came from poor families either. In the case of Ocon, he comes from a middle class family and the fact that he doesn’t have a drive this season is not a question of money. There isn’t a seat for him because there aren’t enough teams. If he really needed a sponsor to get a drive, he could get one (and if he can’t, he needs a new manager a.s.a.p.)
Which brings me to my second point: let’s not confuse being born rich, like Stroll, with bringing sponsorship money. To me, a kid like Hamilton who gets McLaren support at 12 isn’t born rich, he is born with talent. Maldonado was backed by his government, yes, but that wasn’t dad’s money.
Are motorsports accessible to all? Absolutely not. But you don’t have to be a billionaire’s kid to eventually make it to F1.
OMG...Sure , everyone can have his own opinion but this is, with allIt depends.
Console gamers who plays all kinds of games like Mario Bros. and drives their racing games in third-person on a game pad might love to lose their time with story lines that makes them the "center of attention" and, like the graphic of this thread shows, be "interviewed" by a programed toy... I guess if it sells... different strokes for different folks..
I have created my own custom rfmod which includes all the drivers and teams. That way they wont be crazy random names all the time. I then use rfactor 2 log analyzer to track results. Its hard to explain, as it took me hours upon hours to work out myself. I might make a tutorial video if its something you might want.
Try living without Internet for one dayNo. If it has a story mode, it's not a sim, it's a game. Story mode means more time and money spent to develop it, so less resources on technical side of things. And SIM should be considered a tool. Racing game however is a GAME targeted primarily for masses and entertainment, with easy controls, probably designed to be playable with console controllers and keyboard.
F1, as in screenshot, can call itself a "sim" all it wants, but input lag, handling and other issues tell otherwise.
EDIT: Before flaming me, I was referring to "story" side of things. Story is the part with characters, actors, voice acting, scripts etc.
Career is very useful for new players to gradually learn driving.
EDIT#2: Jesus, that's a lot of Disagrees from hurt F1 fanbois
lol another oneTry living without Internet for one day
Would it not be better for the devs to spend their talent and time developing the "driving" experience ? For example working on the track details and the physics/feedback of the sim rather than bugger about with "characters".
Why not. Sims don't often have it, due to their low development resources. But it doesn't make them better sims, but worse.
Racing IRL is also a sequence of races, and points gathered during a long season, not just a single race. You don't simulate that, you don't simulate everything about racing. ACC is supposed to have improved Career mode and I find that a good thing.
I don't need cutscenes or fake emails from sponsors to fill my inbox. Just a realistic championship, with it's rules, points, progression. Maybe even optional "Ironman mode" where you can't restart any race, only save by exiting the game. DNF is DNF, and onto the next race. Maybe your small team needs to pay for every damage, and can go bankrupt.
Like in flight simulators, having campaigns with different consequences for win and loss. Instead of endless skirmish against AI planes, in a meaningless dogfight. Rinse and repeat