Managing Director Marcel Offermans Leaves Studio 397


The rumblings under the Motorsport Games umbrella do not seem to stop: While news on the rFactor 2 side have been positive recently with the announcement of exciting content due this month, the end of May is going to be the end of Studio 397’s Managing Director Marcel Offermans at the company.

Offermans is not the first higher-up to decide that it is time to move on: In early April, it became known that Motorsport Games' President Stephen Hood had left the company, just as the planned BTCC game faced a delay that by now looks like a complete cancellation of the project.

What Offermans’ departure means for the future of rFactor 2 remains to be seen. He shared a YouTube video (see above) titled “So long, and thanks for all the fish!”, a reference to a famous book by Douglas Adams with the same name. The video shows his beloved GTE Corvette exiting the final turn of Circuit Zandvoort at night, followed by a statement regarding his departure.

“By the end of May, it is time to move on”, states Offermans while simultaneously expressing his gratitude for his time with Studio 397: “Over time, we grew the user base by an order of magnitude, improved just about every aspect of the simulation and did some really cool projects and collaboration.” Offermans has been with Studio 397 since 2016.

Update: according to this SEC filing the heads of Luminis, the previous owners of Studio 397, received a million dollars to complete the acquisition of the company but with 2.2 million being differered for undisclosed reasons.​

Interestingly, his successor is apparently already in place to take over in June: “I am leaving rFactor 2 in very capable hands”, reads the penultimate line of Offermans’ statement – although it is not yet known who is going to take over the reigns or what the future holds regarding the simulation. The next content drop including two BTCC cars plus Donington Park, Brands Hatch and Laguna Seca is expected sometime in May.

What are your thoughts regarding this news? Let us know on Twitter @RaceDepartment or in the comments below!
About author
Yannik Haustein
Lifelong motorsport enthusiast and sim racing aficionado, walking racing history encyclopedia.

Sim racing editor, streamer and one half of the SimRacing Buddies podcast (warning, German!).

Heel & Toe Gang 4 life :D

Comments

Horrible argument.

If I wake up and decide that IndyCar at Norisring sounds funny, an online racer would have to...

- Find a league in R3E (slightly difficult, not the most popular sim)
- Find a league that likes IndyCar (kind of hard in a Euro-centric game)
- Find a league that runs at an American timeslot (even more difficult in a Euro centric game)
- Find a league that put Norisring on the schedule (nobody is going to)
- Hope the league has competent drivers
- Hope the league has a good turnout.

The chances of the stars aligning for this in a game with 800 concurrent players who race almost exclusively GT3 and TCR... precisely zero.

And yes, some sims do have great AI. Grand Prix 4, and NR2003, accomplished on vastly inferior hardware.
Play ACC GT3 yes, but plenty of tracks to choose in the lobbies
 
Premium
... Maybe some folks think there are tons of outfits out there clamoring to buy a small operation like Studio 397 and pick-up all the burdens there-in as things currently stand, but I don't personally see it.
If S397 and rF2 is operating at a profit then I don't any see the reason why not. If there is money to be made some one will pick it up. The Banks will make sure if it ever comes to that you can be sure. If anything the May content drop paints a very positive pictures for rF2.
 
Last edited:
D
Hope he cashed lots... Just living the good life, and perhaps make other simulators/games.
 
Simon_Gillett_1216418c.jpg

Meet your new CEO, S397 - you know, he has prior management experience in motorsport, being a CEO of a world famous racetrack
He did manage to secure the British GP from Silverstone to credit
I think you'll be in better hands with him
 
Last edited:
If S397 and rF2 is operating at a profit then I don't any see the reason why not. If there is money to be made some one will pick it up. The Banks will make sure if it ever comes to that you can be sure. If anything the May content drop paints a very positive pictures for rF2.
The new content drops definitely help shed a positive light on things. I think it's just too bad they came along at the same time this MSG drama is unfolding. So now you got all kinds of "reads" going into it. The simulation sector is driven by a very fickle group.

I've always respected what RF2 has to offer because of what I consider a good physics and FFB model, but it's never been a sim that remains installed or regularly used for many of the same reasons others have. I'm not an individual averse to tinkering with things to get a proper setup working either. Progress has been tediously slow even for my taste, but it remains progress nonetheless. Credit where it's due I suppose.

Despite all this, I don't like what I see right now with the business side. Banks don't care about our interests, just shareholders. When 397 accepted MSG's offer they signed up for the associated fiduciary obligations to MSG shareholders. I'm here because this past week I was actually considering installing it again and digging in a bit. Then I saw today's headlines after all the MSG drama. Not even gonna bother at this point, but that's just my prerogative. Too many other viable options (RE: way less risk). Others should judge for themselves.

I do question why Studio 397 got into bed with MSG in the first place. That is not some decision key stakeholders take lightly and you can bet they knew any potential reputation risks at stake going in (unless MSG took them for a ride, but I'd hope they did proper diligence on capital injection). Seems to me this business relationship was a decision made out of necessity. Despite the associated red flags with MSG as an entity, bills need to be paid and the PUBLIC side of the operation was likely at risk IMO. RF2 has always been a niche platform, it's not a secret. Accessibility is high on the list with the attention spans most gamers have today and RF2 is demanding. They've made great strides there, but it's still got a long way to go from where I stand. Perhaps leagues can carry a small and profitable market share, but it probably leads to the kind of development timelines we've come to know with RF2.

Always good to remember two sides of the business exist in this case too. They weigh how much revenue the PRO facet of the business carries (against operational burdens) vs cash generation coming from the PUBLIC facing unit (RF2, DLC's, etc). I bet the former carries a lot, further contributing to the necessity of the current relationship with MSG.

Depending on how MSG unloads their "baggage", along with prospective interests in 397 assets, that will dictate the viability of the PUBLIC facing piece of the business and it's future relevance. IF 397 can take the current situation and exit profitably and stronger for it with a more successful and active title, wonderful, we all win! I'm just being realistic about those odds. I'll watch from the sidelines for now. GL to 397.
 
I see you're hovering around this comment section, Mr. Offermans :roflmao: Best wishes to you in your future endeavours! Thanks for the hard work on rF2. :thumbsup: Hopefully we see you pop up in the sim racing landscape again in the future if it tickles your fancy. ;)

In light of all the other recent concerning news about Motorsport Games, it's hard to not see this as another worrying development connected to the developing MSG mess where Studio 397 is seemingly caught in the crossfire. But I won't say anything linking this news to that until we know something concrete about why Marcel chose to leave and the broader circumstances that led to his choice. Cause I'm not in his head, after all. Sooner or later we might learn more (or maybe not) but until then there's not much (other than 100% speculation) to talk about IMO.
 
Last edited:

Latest News

Article information

Author
Yannik Haustein
Article read time
2 min read
Views
32,118
Comments
273
Last update

What's needed for simracing in 2024?

  • More games, period

  • Better graphics/visuals

  • Advanced physics and handling

  • More cars and tracks

  • AI improvements

  • AI engineering

  • Cross-platform play

  • New game Modes

  • Other, post your idea


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top