2022 Formula One Austrian Grand Prix

Who will win the Austrian Grand Prix?


  • Total voters
    278
  • Poll closed .

Formula 1 is on track this weekend for the Austrian Grand Prix, just one week after an exciting British Grand Prix.

Last weekend's British Grand Prix was, by most accounts, the best race of the season so far, and among the most exciting in the past few years.

A dramatic start which resulted in a terrifying crash set the stage for a thrilling race which saw several lead changes and gave Ferrari's Carlos Sainz his first F1 victory. Throughout the race there were many exciting overtakes, Max Verstappen uncharacteristically struggling thanks to a damaged car, and Mick Schumacher battling hard to secure his first ever points in Formula 1.

And while F1 fans are still trying to catch their breath after that exciting race, the teams and drivers are already set to do battle once again, this time in Austria.

The Red Bull Ring will be the site of the 2022 Austrian Grand Prix, which will feature the Sprint format to determine the grid order for the race.

Ferrari and Red Bull will once again be doing battle at the front of the pack, in all likelihood. Sainz took the top podium step at Silverstone, with his teammate Charles Leclerc in fourth. Sergio Perez for Red Bull battled back after early damage put him back to last place, finishing second place. Verstappen's car also took damage, and the current championship leader was only able to manage seventh place in the end.

The top two spots of the drivers' standings are now both occupied by Red Bull drivers, with Verstappen sitting 34 points in front of Perez. 11 points separate the Ferrari drivers in third and fourth place of the standings, with George Russell of Mercedes completing the top five, despite his DNF in Great Britain.

In the constructors' championship, Red Bull holds an impressive 63-point lead over Ferrari, with Ferrari then holding a 61-point advantage over Mercedes.

Friday and Sunday sessions in Spielberg are looking wet, so there could be some interesting shake-ups in the running order throughout the weekend.

Do you think this race could bring the same level of drama we saw last weekend? Let us know in the comments below.

Photo credits: Williams
About author
Mike Smith
I have been obsessed with sim racing and racing games since the 1980's. My first taste of live auto racing was in 1988, and I couldn't get enough ever since. Lead writer for RaceDepartment, and owner of SimRacing604 and its YouTube channel. Favourite sims include Assetto Corsa Competizione, Assetto Corsa, rFactor 2, Automobilista 2, DiRT Rally 2 - On Twitter as @simracing604

Comments

Premium
...and if the person on the inside decides to drive dirty on corner exit and runs them wide into the spikes...what then? Do the stewards also order the dirty driver to drive over the spikes as a fair penalty? This is ignoring any turning car going well over 150kph and gets their outside tyres slashed will make Zhou's accident look like a gentle tap.

At least they can test the learnings (and solutions) from that crash
 
Premium
Track limits are another additional layer of FIA-EffWun stupidity.
Simple solution, stop penalising drivers, or just line the circuit(s) with sausage kerbs!
Of course said kerbs would need to be removable as many circuits are used for MotoGP rounds.
 
Track limits are another additional layer of FIA-EffWun stupidity.
Simple solution, stop penalising drivers, or just line the circuit(s) with sausage kerbs!
Of course said kerbs would need to be removable as many circuits are used for MotoGP rounds.
Sausage kerbs create more problems. Don't believe me? Watch the following clip that happened yesterday at Monza:


Those things need to be removed from racing tracks forever.
 
Why don't we replace them with the old good and green grass and forgot about this absurd thing of letting everybody run wide as it's all around covered in pavement.
 
Sausage kerbs create more problems. Don't believe me? Watch the following clip that happened yesterday at Monza:


Those things need to be removed from racing tracks forever.
Where the hell did that door go? I'm guessing it landed on the moon!!!!
 
Why don't we replace them with the old good and green grass and forgot about this absurd thing of letting everybody run wide as it's all around covered in pavement.
You’re probably right for F1 cars, but I think this pavement replacement trend is more a function of safety for other racing series or modalities. Look at how versatile Circuit Paul Ricard is since they’ve taken the “abrasive pavement” approach. I’m also a big MotoGP fan, so not going to complain about having more tracks as options.

On a separate note, this race really needed DRS. We all saw how difficult it often was for clearly quicker cars to overtake even with that additional advantage. I think at this track it accomplished the original goal of helping to mitigate the aero disadvantages of following another car without taking the skill/strategy away from the process.
 
Regarding track limits (for cars) it's easy peasy, historically it's been the line around the edge of the track. Two wheels over and it's ok, more than two instant infringement, 3 infringments 10 second stop go penalty. Crossing to avoid a crash is a more complex matter but for the stewards to decide if a car was unfarily forced into avoidance and if anyone gained advantage. I just do not understand why the stewards canot enforce common sense!!
 
Couldn't they just wire the edges of the track surface and include rfid chip or some such identifier so that there would be no grey area. You DID exceed the boundaries cuz the computer says you did.
 
Couldn't they just wire the edges of the track surface and include rfid chip or some such identifier so that there would be no grey area. You DID exceed the boundaries cuz the computer says you did.
How many times including in the simulators the estimation of track limit excedeed was not correctly applied.
Tech is fine in F1 and is the most advance racing category, but some things needs to stick as natural and as basic as possible. What F1 was loosing all this year's since 2007 is the lack of risk on getting a high risk to retire if you miss a turn.
Today you can go off almost anywhere you like with low cost on doing so. So the best approach is to get back to grass (maybe gravel) and put some escape routs beyond to get easier exit if you did not stall your engine as in Austria, Spa, etc.

Paul Richard is awful to the eyes, not the layout but the track itself is ugly. At first, you don't know where to go, all those colored lines does miss a lot on what is track and where you should be able to go. The F1 layout is very nice to drive.
 
Premium
The track limits issue is due to increasing the track width by adding rumble strip kerbs outside the "proper" tarmac track. Watch any race at any track and every driver uses the red and white kerbs to "chop" corners which they do because there is no penalty for doing this. We all do it when sim racing.

Solution? Ummmm. Well concrete walls work for street circuits but we don't want races to be run in "Hot Wheels" type tracks.
So do we go for a high tech method with some track sensors to determine if a car is off the track? Drivers protest that they are not guilty but an electronic method would allow the driver to alerted to his infringement.
A bit like one of these buzz toys?

buzz toy.jpg


Or a physical/mechanical method?
But what?
Croft Circuit has some plastic "poles" at the first corners that always get torn out in the first couple of laps so would appear to be no real deterrent.
Anything substantial may put cars, drivers and spectators at risk.

Perhaps just rip up the kerbs and replace with grass.
Put your wheels off the track and you might end up in the gravel traps, spinning or losing traction.
But then with others having their "elbows out" you may find yourself unfairly penalised.
 
Last edited:
Premium
Sausage kerbs create more problems. Don't believe me? Watch the following clip that happened yesterday at Monza:


Those things need to be removed from racing tracks forever.
The object of the exercise is to prevent drivers from running over the kerbs. Looks as if the kerbs served out a penalty in this case.
 
The object of the exercise is to prevent drivers from running over the kerbs. Looks as if the kerbs served out a penalty in this case.
By that logic it's perfectly acceptable to put a big pool of lava on either side of the track limits. You go off track, you DIE, that's a penalty now innit?
 
I'm not sure there is one single way to enforce track limits that should be the same for every corner or any track. There are corners that have been sort of ruined when they removed the gravel, like Monza's parabolica. There is not any corner like that at the Red Bull ring and the sausage curbs at T1 and T3 do the job. The GT3 accident at la Roggia chicane was nasty, but it was also a very big driver mistake: if you approach the corner too fast you're supposed to go straight and around the curbs, there's a lane for that.
 
Last edited:
The object of the exercise is to prevent drivers from running over the kerbs. Looks as if the kerbs served out a penalty in this case.
No, what they did was to cause an unnecessary accident, something that has happened time and time again with these things in several racing series around the world.

They should be removed from all racing tracks in the world. Two wrongs don't make one right.
 
Just finished watching the recording of the race and I'm mega impressed how Charles handled the issues he had at the end of the race, a sticky throttle is a mare. Great win for the lad.
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Mike Smith
Article read time
2 min read
Views
12,391
Comments
116
Last update

What would make you race in our Club events

  • Special events

    Votes: 62 29.5%
  • More leagues

    Votes: 41 19.5%
  • Prizes

    Votes: 43 20.5%
  • Trophies

    Votes: 24 11.4%
  • Forum trophies

    Votes: 14 6.7%
  • Livestreams

    Votes: 32 15.2%
  • Easier access

    Votes: 115 54.8%
  • Other? post your reason

    Votes: 34 16.2%
Back
Top