Sometimes I have the feeling that some people thinks "FSR" is a person who does everything in this league. But the truth is that it is managed by different people, and each division has a different race director. We are under the same rules, but we can have different opinions regarding an incident, specially when we have to apply a penalty. You can't expect the exact same criteria for all of us.
I think any incident that is considered debatable should initially be reviewed by a board of people instead of one sole race director. This should be something the race director initially has a view on but before making any kind of ruling should go through a board that makes a joined decision. This would limit any potential of bias (this is not saying there was any bias at all, just making it as neutral as possible generally speaking) and would make decisions more consistant. I think it's not in the interest of the league to first have a ruling and then have it appelead and then possibly have all that change.
Especially since the rules in the league and racing in general are the kind where things can be seen in many different ways.