So I got it right? It felt good, but I wasn't sure.
There no real right or wrong here, it only matters what feel right for you
If you like it, stick with it.
There are rigs with surge modules that move
forwards under braking, but there are also surge slides that move
backwards under braking (most realistic imho)
What feels best to you is what matters
The SimXperience G-Belt is an awesome product from the company that has been industry leading. They brought us first physic based tactile, the first commercial direct drive and the amazing GS-5 seat.
If i hadn't build a belt tensioner myself i would have bought it instantly.
However, i personally have my doubts with all those effects being mapped to the belts.
I can understand people want to get the most out of their G-belt system, but for me personally a belt tensioner
only tensions under braking.
Nothing else
Same applies for my GS-5 which can handle all sorts of effects, but i only use it for (clear) simulated G-s both lateral and surge.
For example: If the left belt tensions up into a righthand corner and you hit the brakes, You will only clearly feel the right belt tension up because of the braking forces. Of course having a G-seat makes it a lot easier to have such a view point, since the G-seat is already simulating the lateral G-forces.
I have tried this myself and it's just not for me. If i want to, i can map
anything i want and convert it to an output on the belt system. I just choose not to.
This is a
personal preference, again there's no right or wrong. I'm not a saint or a purist, i just set things up like i want it to feel. For me a buttkicker can not simulate G-force same as that a belt can not simulate traction loss.
I do have (unrealistic) wind curving enabled in Simhub, which is complete wrong, but i like it.
Respect to the guys with the 5th crotch belt. That area is probably where i draw the line between comfort and immersion. When i had a 2 belt system i tackled this issue by moving the central lock just above my belly button. This meant the bottom belts where already facing upwards and were not being pulled higher through the upper belt tensioner.
With a 4-belt system it's not necessary at all since all 4 belts are being pulled simultaneously.
Out of curiosity is there a big performance drop from moving the G-belt from the back of the seat to the base of the rig ? From a aesthetic view point and because of physics i would always prefer to have it there.