Porsche 997 GT3 RSR [Deleted]

jarerawwr · Jul 9, 2014

mclarenf1papa said:
Not cheating, stealing. I don't give a **** about the quality of the mod, especially because this one's very bad anyway. I care about the fact that it's stolen.

Obviously it's not doing you much good to get yourself all worked up about it. Just move the hell on. Jeez. You've made your opinion quite clear MULTIPLE times on this thread alone.

mod-edit: again, you need to keep a civil discussion

mclarenf1papa · Jul 9, 2014

jarerawwr said:
Obviously it's not doing you much good to get yourself all worked up about it. Just move the hell on. Jeez. You've made your opinion quite clear MULTIPLE times on this thread alone.

edit: not worth my time.....

ML2166 · Jul 9, 2014

Scratch built?

Ripped????

ROFLMFAO!!!

yusupov · Jul 9, 2014

omg guys someone stole a copy of a model car from microsft!!! OMG i bet he's going to h-e-l-l!!!

Matthes Uhlenbusch · Jul 9, 2014

I use the Porsche since 3 days, i fit the brakes, handling, suspension and transmissions. Now it runs 306 kmh at 8600. Great one. More stuff please. I would pay for it ;-)

CC · Jul 9, 2014

Rupe Wilson said:
You can not report content that is not yours, please read our Terms of Service,
And i suggest you alter your tone when asking for something.
The staff don't take kindly to demands in capital letters.

You can not report content that is not yours , so the next time I upload a mod I should report myself yes ? !

Mod edit: Do not povoke. You should really respect what he is saying.
The ToS is there for a reason, read it, understand it. You don't have to agree with it, but there have been enough discussions now for everyone to understand how RD deals with it.

ENDR · Jul 9, 2014

chargingcar said:
so the next time I upload a mod I should report myself yes ? !

If you think that mod contains some content created by you without your own permission, then sure, report away.
That might qualify as mild schizophrenia though...

CC · Jul 9, 2014

ENDR said:
If you think that mod contains some content created by you without your own permission, then sure, report away.
That might qualify as mild schizophrenia though...

I reported it straight away 5 minutes after it was uploaded , but I reported the review that someone had left the direct link to the mod , but if someone reported it to AC it would be gone in 5 minutes as it in no way leads an example for the community to follow allowing mods from ripped content specially from microsoft but if RD can afford to take them on then good luck

ML2166 · Jul 9, 2014

Split personality much CC?

Slightly schizo?

CC · Jul 10, 2014

ML2166 said:
Split personality much CC?

Slightly schizo?

Different person every 5 minutes me m8 you should see my wardrobe

Stereo · Jul 10, 2014

Joseph Maxx said:
My point is don't assume that just because you're OK with it everyone else is. Most of the people who are happy to do it for free can do so because it's not their bread and butter. There are many things I volunteer to do free of charge but that does not mean I'm OK with people stealing my livelihood.

There's also a bit of a difference from 'happy to do it free' and 'can't get a job doing it'... there are plenty of reasons you could enjoy doing something but not be able to make money from it.

Anyway, there'll always be the flood of crappy converted content, but for me it has a lifespan about as long as the time taken to produce it - that is, short. So in the best case it's a temporary diversion, in the worst case it drowns out the good stuff. You can only take so many photos of a Forza model in AC's engine ... if it doesn't drive well, then it's no better than having it in Forza, even disregarding the illegality.

Overwhelmingly, the people who can do a good job at the whole package - physics, graphics, sounds, game-specific features - work on original content, because they're not satisfied with "posted for 3 days until the original author requests it's taken down".

Dinca Andrei · Jul 10, 2014

This "war" was expected even before the Tech Demo release....
Anyone is responsible for their actions....if the owner of the original content does not do anything about the ripped content then its their problem,or its possible that they dont know and about the "Conversionists" who makes this conversions,its all about the respect for the devs and the content they use from different games.Some are happy,some are not...and will going on forever...
No one can force anyone to do something..especially over internet....We can only assist from the bench.

Michael Hornbuckle · Jul 10, 2014

jarerawwr said:
I'm trying to learn how to convert cars. Mostly because I want to see some stuff in-game that I truly enjoy.. Like F-Bodies, for instance. I've owned several third-gens, including both an '86 WS.6 Trans Am and an '87 IROC-Z/28, and the delicousness that is the '99 Trans Am. I'd love to get some of those cars in AC. And a '68 Chevelle.

So. Much. This.

Sebastian Wolff · Jul 10, 2014

what I don`t get is: if Kunos doesn`t allow stolen or half-assed ripped mods in AC, why is RD not complying with those terms and hosts those obvious rip-offs in the AC section??
I seriously tried to understand RDs point of view in the beginning, but now it doesn`t make any sense anymore. What do you gain by this policy, or strategy or whatever you might call it.

Sebastian Wolff · Jul 10, 2014

Stereo said:
...because they're not satisfied with "posted for 3 days until the original author requests it's taken down".

that`s the other thing, why shift the responsibility to the original author and not take responsibility yourself in the first place?!

jarerawwr · Jul 10, 2014

Well, in an attempt to appease the RD AC Gods, I reported my upload. It's still up. So maybe RD doesn't want to take it down?

Deleted member 161052 · Jul 10, 2014

jarerawwr said:
Well, in an attempt to appease the RD AC Gods, I reported my upload. It's still up. So maybe RD doesn't want to take it down?

See this post below...again

Georg Siebert said:
If the original copyright holder (Turn 10 in this case) reports us an infringement of copyright and provides proof, we will immediately take it down.

jarerawwr · Jul 10, 2014

So, if I uploaded my own content, then decided I didn't want it hosted anymore, what then? Because (regardless of discussion or knowledge about an illegal conversion) there hasn't been any formal notification of copyright violation, then it's "my" file. So can't I just request it to be removed? Maybe one of the mods can enlighten us.

seanvdburg · Jul 10, 2014

Seriously, they should have kept this thing on its original forum, where it was initially uploaded. All this controversy...
Jarerawwr, i'ts better to take it down, or this discussion will go on until my hair turns grey

.