Incident investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
So we will set some rules on the WAR forum to grant it works faster and better:

1.-
INCIDENT REPORT IS POSTED
2.- TEAM SPOKESMAN (Yes, only team spokesman) VOTES AND POST AN EXPLANATION OF THE REASON WHY HE VOTED FOR THAT OPTION.
3.- THAT´s ALL. NEXT TEAM SPOKESMAN VOTING WILL NOT ARGUE ABOUT WHAT HE CONSIDERES FAIR OR NOT, HE WILL SIMPLY VOTE AND POST HIS REASONS.

**
From now on it will work like this and we will take actions against the ones breaking that rules as loosing rights to vote. We can´t live with this weekly calendar and keeping on discussing an incident for years.
Since you have closed the other one :Something very important missing here David. The reported team has a right to an explenation. In fact i think its fair, the reported driver/team should answer first before the vote starts as there could be things like lag that could have caused the incident. The accusing team gives his version, so the reported team should be able to give theirs. Video doesn't, say everything.
 
good point, Tom, but lag for instance should be proven by video from player's replay, which clearly records lag as experienced by player in the game (at least mine do).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom