Hehe, not really, but I was just messing with lowering the ride height here (via super soft springs)
I was curious how correct the kinematics were for the change in camber under bump.
The values are in the debug readout... quite high I thought as it really stood out when watching replays seeing the cambers move so much.
I'm not sure exactly what reasonable ranges might be for the camber change under bump on this car but it just seems higher than I'd expect.
When doing a few repeated drops by going back to pits then to racer there appeared to be no apparent change in toe over this huge deflection range either.
Just interesting to look at what kind of kinematic behaviour KS have chosen for their F458 I think
Also is it just me, or does anyone else not get any shading under the car when in the shade from sunlight?
Thanks
Dave
I was curious how correct the kinematics were for the change in camber under bump.
The values are in the debug readout... quite high I thought as it really stood out when watching replays seeing the cambers move so much.
I'm not sure exactly what reasonable ranges might be for the camber change under bump on this car but it just seems higher than I'd expect.
When doing a few repeated drops by going back to pits then to racer there appeared to be no apparent change in toe over this huge deflection range either.
Just interesting to look at what kind of kinematic behaviour KS have chosen for their F458 I think
Also is it just me, or does anyone else not get any shading under the car when in the shade from sunlight?
Thanks
Dave