Changeable weather

[Nicolai Nicholson]

Well I guess if we have a guy who has already done that and has done a good job theres no reason to make anything different than before. So Daniel should just continue where he stopped.
Welcome back

I would say it all depends on Daniel. If he "takes pleasure" from doing it, I would want him to continue, however, if it is a chore that he feels he should do I would rather relieve him of that and do it ourselves. So what do you say Daniel...

Btw, welcome back Daniel

 

[Reik Major]

Jo, welcome back Daniel!

 

[Daniel Hansson]

Thanks.
It has become pretty swift to do it, because I have pretty much everything set up in my Excel sheets. And I think I can simplify the process even more. So it's not much of a chore. And it's a lot better to have someone who's not racing do the weather.

So I can jump back in and continue with the weather. Should we follow the the same setup as in the last races of last season?

 

[Nicolai Nicholson]

Great stuff Daniel. We can follow the same setup as last year, but perhaps a quick discussion about % chance of rain!?

 

[Peter Marshall]

So I can jump back in and continue with the weather. Should we follow the the same setup as in the last races of last season?

Excellent. The practice, super-pole, warmup and race distance are unchanged from Season 7. Thank you Daniel.

Great stuff Daniel. We can follow the same setup as last year, but perhaps a quick discussion about % chance of rain!?

Last two seasons it appeared to me that we had a 1/10 chance for a rain affected race. e.g. Hungary.
Perhaps we could up that overall "expectation" to 2/10?

 

[Nicolai Nicholson]

Yes, I think most would like a boost in chance of weather

Daniel, did you see Reik's amazing graphical display of what condition number represent what weather earlier in this thread? Is that consistant with your knowledge of it?

 

[Daniel Hansson]

Yeah I've seen, and envied, it . Terrific stuff. But I've not done so much tests myself. Not enough to make something like that anyway.

 

[Nicolai Nicholson]

Yeah I've seen, and envied, it . Terrific stuff. But I've not done so much tests myself. Not enough to make something like that anyway.

Then you can just use reik's

 

[Peter Marshall]

Then you can just use reik's

Is Reik's graph gone?

 

[Valter Ostman]

http://www.pictureupload.de/originals/pictures/060212185846_Example-and-Interpretation.jpg
I can't access Reik's chart file.

 

[Reik Major]

Is Reik's graph gone?

Ouch, it looks like that! I think pictureupload.de is down. I will upload it again somewhere else and edit the post asap, most likely late in the evening.

 

[Reik Major]

Hm, just wanted to update post #23 by uploading the pic somewhere else but now it's up again at its original place.

 

[Kennett Ylitalo]

Yes, I think most would like a boost in chance of weather

Daniel, did you see Reik's amazing graphical display of what condition number represent what weather earlier in this thread? Is that consistant with your knowledge of it?

Not a question for me but yes, that data is correct. I've done a lot of testing with different conditions (again, a part of tracktests, need to find correct rainscale..) And that's my interpretation too.