Motorsport Games Granted Nasdaq Extension

Motorsport Games Granted Nasdaq Extension RD.jpg
Following a delisting notice in November, the Nasdaq has accepted Motorsport Games’ plan for regaining compliance and enacted a deadline.

Images: Motorsport Games

The beleaguered developer has been through the wringer of late, but as it gears up for the launch of Le Mans Ultimate in just 13 days, the Nasdaq has extended its stay on the stock market.

On 17th November 2023, Motorsport Games noted that it had received a deficiency letter from the New York-based exchange’s Listing Qualifications Department. Back then, the following items were flagged as potential issues:
  • A stockholders’ equity of $498,897, below the minimum requirement.
  • A market value of listed securities of at least $35 million or net income of $500,000 from continuing operations in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the three most recently completed fiscal years.
The owner of Studio 397, and therefore titles such as rFactor 2, was then afforded up to 45 days to submit a plan to regain compliance.

Evidently, that proposal was submitted and now the Nasdaq, according to a recent SEC filing, has given the Miami-headquartered developer until 15th May 2024 to regain compliance and specifically a minimum stockholders’ equity of $2,500,000.

No small task, when MSGM closed yesterday (6th January 2024) at a paltry $2.46, factoring in 2022’s 1-for-10 reverse stock split. Should a delisting be the determined outcome, Motorsport Games still has the option of appealing any decision.

How long will Indycar remain in rFactor 2?


Delisting itself could result in numerous scenarios (such as trading over the counter) and does not necessarily mean the automatic cessation of operations.

“The company plans to negotiate and implement equity financing transactions and negotiate reductions of its licensing liabilities,” reads the document signed by Motorsport Games’ CEO Stephen Hood.

What any potential ‘equity financing transaction’ entails rather obviously, is unclear. As for ‘licensing liabilities’, according to a separate SEC filing last year, it owed the BARC (TOCA – the BTCC promoter) ‘approximately’ $800,000 in licencing payments.

In November last year, IndyCar notified Motorsport Games of its intention to terminate the exclusive deals to create ‘video gaming products’ and ‘esports events’ (but, seemingly, leaving the door open for ‘simulation product’ rights). This followed the pausing of game development and redundancy of the Australian team creating it.

Yet, no further update has been provided since the initial “evaluating the validity of INDYCAR LLC’s notice of termination” notice. Therefore, there is a chance that this deal is still an asset that can be sold, much like the sales of NASCAR video game rights to iRacing in October 2023.

Le Mans Ultimate, by Studio 397 and Motorsport Games

Clearer Skies For Le Mans Ultimate’s Launch​

All this financial manoeuvring has hung over Motorsport Games like a dark cloud since the release of the ill-fated NASCAR 21: Ignition.

The news of a Nasdaq grace period is potentially good news for the team trying to get Le Mans Ultimate over the line for the 20th February.

With this now just days away, the focus must be on delivering the best simulation possible for the initial early access launch with this grace period providing a temporary reprieve.
About author
Thomas Harrison-Lord
A freelance sim racing, motorsport and automotive journalist. Credits include Autosport Magazine, Motorsport.com, RaceDepartment, Overtake, Traxion and TheSixthAxis.

Comments

This company is LITERALLY releasing LMU as a last ditch hailmary to save the company.

Can we have a new rule on the forum?

If anyone buys LMU on day one ... they cannot complain about it.

I'm serious.
Yep, it stinks to hail Mary, they are betting everything on this title. I hope they crash and burn, and then all those licenses and intellectual property can fall in better hands. If LMU enjoy success then we are going to be locked in the license hell for who knows how much time.
 
Last edited:
Don't understand why the people that run this website are so intent on posting this stuff. Wouldn't post it if it was any other game company yet because its motorsport games you keep on doing it. Been a member of RD since the start but barely come here anymore as its always the same biased rubbish. But then that's overtakes influence.
 
Last edited:
Don't understand why the people that run this website are so intent on posting this stuff. Wouldn't post it if it was any other game company yet because its motorsport games you keep on doing it. Been a member of RD since the start but barely come here anymore as its always the same biased rubbish. But then that's overtakes influence.
Because articles about eNascar or similar stuff don't generate enough clicks. Atmosphere on this website has generaly moved from "great, new sim content" to "let's see how we drag MSG and S397 again through the dirt". You can't make a video about how LMU will be released into EA without talking about the issues, that "might be" connected to it. Don't remember anything like that when ACC or AMS2 was released. Wich is a clear sign that the writers on this website only serve a certain audience.
 
Because articles about eNascar or similar stuff don't generate enough clicks. Atmosphere on this website has generaly moved from "great, new sim content" to "let's see how we drag MSG and S397 again through the dirt". You can't make a video about how LMU will be released into EA without talking about the issues, that "might be" connected to it. Don't remember anything like that when ACC or AMS2 was released. Wich is a clear sign that the writers on this website only serve a certain audience.
Glad it's not just me noticing it. Websites and the people that write these articles are the reason why companies don't survive. Studio397's recent content to rf2 like the btcc stuff has been brilliant I could spend forever lapping on it.
 
Perhaps its just that MSG is the only company to have created so many issues and bad juju within the industry that these issues become part of the community discussion.
Wich issues? We are basicly are at a point where we have more choices to sim race than ever. How anyone can try to seek for "issues" with all that is beyond me. People have far bigger problems with how their events are called instead of questioning certain business models that only favor the rich kids. Should I explain what's wrong with this "industry"?
 
Premium
Perhaps you should read the articles rather then get triggered by them.

And no, I don't consider you have the capacity or insight to explain anything, so you can hold off on that initiative thanks.

Considered a hobby to alleviate some some of this stress?
 
Perhaps its just that MSG is the only company to have created so many issues and bad juju within the industry that these issues become part of the community discussion.

Creating bad juju happens on all sim racing titles... From bad marketing and half baked releases over the last decade...

Some come with shady investors and partners as well... MSGS does have a long laundry list for such a short lived company... But it's not the only guilty party in todays BETA release world...

People care far too much about the pissing contests of the rich... It's not worth stressing that much over...
 
Last edited:
Premium
Creating bad juju happens on all sim racing titles... From bad marketing and half baked releases over the last decade...

Some come with shady investors and partners as well... MSGS does have a long laundry list for such a short lived company... But it's not the only guilty party in todays BETA release world...

People care far too much about the pissing contests of the rich... It's not worth stressing that much over...
You do realise your post just mirrored what I said but with more words?

Not quite sure if that was your intention...
 
Man MSG games bit off more than they could chew, how many of us have ever done that? I know I have. Then they made a really BAD Nascar game, BOOHOO!! Anybody that wants to race Nascar these days is playing iRacing anyway. Like has already been said earlier they made some damn good content for Rfactor2, so why dont we move on to talking about something positive instead of bashing on MSG? Its getting kind of old at this point. Just my two cents.
 
What's up with the MSG apologists? They bought up a bunch of developers and exclusive licenses, promised a plethora of games/sims, and the result so far is 1 broken new game (Nascar) and a bunch of licenses getting revoked. Now they are on the edge of bankruptcy, potentially bringing down one of the most beloved dev teams in sim racing. Even if ignoring all the shady stuff in the background, this is bad.

If the initial feedback from the content creators I trust is going to be good about LMU, I will certainly get it. If it helps save sim dev jobs, even better.
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Thomas Harrison-Lord
Article read time
2 min read
Views
6,198
Comments
66
Last update

What's needed for simracing in 2024?

  • More games, period

  • Better graphics/visuals

  • Advanced physics and handling

  • More cars and tracks

  • AI improvements

  • AI engineering

  • Cross-platform play

  • New game Modes

  • Other, post your idea


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top