Motorsport Games Entire Board Of Directors Have Resigned

chrome_A1dIsboOVg.png
The Motorsport Games Odyssey keeps on continuing. And it keeps on getting weirder. In the latest stroke of madness, the entire board of directors resigned due to a "proposal to raise additional capital".

As if the story of Motorsport Games couldn't get any more complicated and convoluted, today's news seems to top everything off.

As the American company tries to find a way to raise more capital, its parent company Motorsport Network seems to have made such an outrageous proposal that the entire board of directors have resigned.

But first, a little lesson in company structure and stocks:

What is a Board of Directors?​

A board of directors (B of D) is the governing body of a company, elected by shareholders in the case of public companies to set strategy and oversee management. The board typically meets at regular intervals. Every public company must have a board of directors. - Investopedia
So a few key facts are:
  • The board of directors of a public company is elected by shareholders.
  • The board makes key decisions on issues such as mergers and dividends, hires senior managers, and sets their pay.
  • Board of directors candidates can be nominated by the company's nominations committee or by outsiders seeking change.
  • The New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq require listed companies to have a majority of outside, or independent, directors on their board.
Now the last of these points might prove troublesome for the company yet, as the current Board of Directors, which seems to be made up of 1 person appointed by Motorsport Network, is no longer NASDAQ compliant.

This means that, should no solution be found in the near future, Motorsport Games could be delisted from NASDAQ.

Why being delisted is bad.​

If a company has been delisted, it is no longer trading on a major exchange, but the stockholders are not stripped of their status as owners. The stock still exists, and they still own the shares; however, delisting often results in a significant or total devaluing of a company's share value.

Therefore, although a shareholder's ownership of a company does not decrease after a company is delisted, that ownership may become worth much less, or, in some cases, it may lose its entire value.

As a shareholder, you should seriously revisit your investment decision in a company that has become delisted. In many cases, it may be better to cut your losses. A firm unable to meet the listing requirements of the exchange upon which it is traded is quite obviously not in a great position. - Investopedia

So, basically, if a company is delisted from NASDAQ, the stock value tends to drop dramatically. Meaning some investors or shareholders might think sooner rather than later to "get off the sinking ship".

So to keep a TL;DR of everything: This is pretty bad.

After saving themselves from delisting with a 1-to-10 stock split, they are now at risk again.

At this point, what do you think of this odyssey that Motorsport Games is going through? Is the company saveable? And how do you think will rFactor 2 be affected? Let us know in the comments down below!
About author
Julian Strasser
Motorsports and Maker-stuff enthusiast. Part time jack-of-all-trades. Owner of tracc.eu, a sim racing-related service provider and its racing community.

Comments

Premium
I did my part and purchased over $100 in rf2 cars and tracks last weekend. I have been rediscovering rf2 and it does offer features and content not in other sims.

My advise is to sell rf2 to Renato and he can get a team to make the definitive IndyCar game based on rf2.
 
Here’s hoping that Studio397 survives and is picked up by someone with legitimate financial resources and is committed to the racing sim community.

Like EA? Or iRacing?
 
Another lesson is build a good product, then market it, and sales will provide revenue and hopefully profit. This idea of marketing with a WIP product, or worse is doing irrefutable harm to the industry as a whole. Some may claim that RF2 is one of the best, if not the best sim racing games available. Others, myself included, argue then why is it, it seems like it is one failed promise after another? I'm not picking on RF2, the article started it;), but this is across the board with very few exceptions. These developers appear to lack what most successful businesses have. Vision, Plan, Execute, Improve repeat. No sim racing game is without it's problems, but when these problems are continually addressed with thinly veiled excuses that sound more like 'we'll get to it when it suits us' we can't be surprised when the results are catastrophic. BTW how is that nascar release going these days?
 
Premium
I honestly could never figure out why you would buy a sim and try to port it to a ue5 build when it has issues in its own engine. It seems like it would have been better to just put those resources into making it work on the current graphic/physics engine. Its been looking good lately. AC took a while till they got ACC to be a nice sim in ue4, and MSG was just going to take a game that was very glitchy in many ways and port it to ue5 and problems solved!?!
 
Last edited:
D
So in the end we only have iRacing, AC/ACC and AMS 1/2? Maybe they can snoop some goodies from Motorsport if they go.
 
Staff
Premium
Honestly I hope Motorsport Games finally goes under so we can get companies that actually have experience running racing games/sims... well, running games/sims. NASCAR, WEC, Indycar, BTCC, and Studio 397 have made the mistake of going all-in to a company that has literally no experience with any type of racing.

You'd think they would know to do proper research and go with a company that actually... has experience.

Yes, they have 704 Games, but even still, those games weren't entirely the best either.

Keeping the original comment but editing to add a bit of clarity.
If we're going to give a game publisher a license that lasts practically 10 years, maybe make sure the user base actually likes the company? And that said company hasn't been around for like, only a year or two?

TLDR - Just because they pulled off a couple standalone events doesn't mean they should be trusted with game development/publishing for multiple years with multiple series.

We won't though. It's not like Motorsport Games outbid others for the license. No devs are lining up, waiting to grab NASCAR, IndyCar, WEC, BTCC etc.
 
We won't though. It's not like Motorsport Games outbid others for the license. No devs are lining up, waiting to grab NASCAR, IndyCar, WEC, BTCC etc.
Indycar was in conversation with Reiza for AMS2. And other sims will likely make a more sensible offer for WEC and Nascar at more reasonable values than the multi-millions dumb offers MSG made to have exclusive of products that are unlikely to return any margin alone without being included in a platform.
BTCC has just no market of value.
My bet is iracing will scoop up everything except BTCC without exclusivity for much less money.
Reiza gets their Indy cars license too.
 
Last edited:
Staff
Premium
Indycar was in conversation with Reiza for AMS2. And other sims will likely make a more sensible offer for WEC and Nascar at more reasonable values than the multi-millions dumb offers MSG made to have exclusive of products that are unlikely to return any margin alone without being included in a platform.
BTCC has just no market of value.
My bet is iracing will scoop up everything except BTCC without exclusivity for much less money.
Reiza gets their Indy cars license too.

I wish I shared your optimism. I see no reason why WEC suddenly will get their game now, when they didn't back when WEC was a lot more popular.
No Indy/IMSA game either.

Personally I want a proper WEC-game, IndyCar-game, NASCAR-game and BTCC-game. Not just cars included in other games to drive :/
 
I wish I shared your optimism. I see no reason why WEC suddenly will get their game now, when they didn't back when WEC was a lot more popular.
No Indy/IMSA game either.

Personally I want a proper WEC-game, IndyCar-game, NASCAR-game and BTCC-game. Not just cars included in other games to drive :/
Don't mean "their" game. They will just get their content added to iracing and possibly partially AMS2. Others are probably not real contenders until the new wave of sims comes out.
Their "own" games aren't financially viable if they are not arcade like F1 20xx and even then it's doubtful.
At best they can be DLC packs in a broader platform and with a moderate cost, not multi million deals.
 
Last edited:

Latest News

Article information

Author
Julian Strasser
Article read time
2 min read
Views
32,638
Comments
166
Last update

What's needed for simracing in 2024?

  • More games, period

  • Better graphics/visuals

  • Advanced physics and handling

  • More cars and tracks

  • AI improvements

  • AI engineering

  • Cross-platform play

  • New game Modes

  • Other, post your idea


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top