Kozko Out, Hood In as Motorsport Games CEO

Hood Kozko Motorsport Games.jpg
Following the reveal of their 2022 Q4 results last month, rFactor 2 developers Motorsport Games have moved on from their previous CEO.

Image credit: Motorsport Games

After a period of some turmoil, Motorsport Games has terminated the employment of their previous CEO Dmitry Kozko, effective as of 19 April 2023. In his place, Stephen Hood will take up the mantel of Motorsport Games CEO, returning to the company after just over a year. Kozko will remain involved with the company as a director.

In a statement provided to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Motorsport Games outlined their reasoning for taking this step.

“The board of directors, while noting Mr. Kozko’s significant efforts and achievements, especially in fund raising, for the Company, concluded that Mr. Hood’s extensive prior knowledge of the Company and its products and extensive experience in game development would be a better fit for the Company in its games’ development stage.”

Hood served as the president of Motorsport Games from April 2019 to January 2022. Beforehand, he worked as a director of 704 Games, the developers behind the NASCAR Heat games, and as a Creative Director and Chief Game Designer for Codemasters.

A Rocky Road​

Late last year, Motorsport Games underwent significant changes to the composition of its upper management. Several members of the board of directors resigned their posts within the company shortly before it was due to reveal its Q3 results.

More recently, MSG’s Q4 results revealed a 54% decrease in revenue compared to the previous year’s fourth quarter, a fall from $8.2 million to $3.8 million. However, a reduction to the financial outlay with regards to sales and marketing, as well as development, meant that the net loss fell from $7 million in Q4 2021 to $4.8 million in Q4 2022.

Despite this reduction to the net loss figures, the company stated that “we do not believe we have sufficient cash on hand to fund our operations for the remainder of 2023, and that additional funding will be required in order to continue operations.”

Editor's Take (Jacob Hancox)​

In my opinion, a shakeup at the top of Motorsport Games makes perfect sense. Given Mr. Kozko’s cited strengths being “especially in fund raising”, combined with the poor state of MSG’s balance sheets, it is evident that the current approach was not conducive to the company’s long-term success.

As such, I also believe it is a sensible step to maintain Mr. Kozko as a director of the company, so that he may “assist the board of directors and the management of the Company with fundraising”.

On a similar note, the decision to bring back Mr. Hood makes a good deal of sense. His background and experience with game development may well lead to better quality products. Given the public reception to Motorsport Games’ NASCAR 21: Ignition, which sits at a shocking 26% approval rating on Steam, it is essential that the company focuses on quality.

Motorsport Games’ own statements regarding its future aren’t promising, and nor is the fact that the development budget was reduced in an effort to balance the books. However, we can at least hope that this is a step in the right direction for the company and therefore for sim racing as a whole.


What are your thoughts on Motorsport Games’ future? Tell us on Twitter at @OverTake_gg or in the comments down below!
About author
Jacob (OverTake)
My name is Jacob and I have been writing for OverTake since November of 2020. I come from the UK, but I'm now living in Berlin. I love to watch, write about and sometimes shout about all forms of racing.

Comments

Great to see MSG making changes to right the ship. I'm sure we soon see the plan to bring out world class sim titles. Should be exciting.
With all the licenses they hold, I sure hope you're right.

I'll admit that I'll only believe it when I see it... but it'd be nice. :)
 
On another note... this was my first time noticing an article written by Overtake here on RD. What stuck out was that my site suddenly said "OVERTAKE" at the top, instead of RaceDepartment, and switched from my usual RD dark mode to a light mode with an Overtake-branded color theme. That was a surprise! For a moment, I wondered if I'd been redirected to a different site altogether.
 
Is this the Financial Times of simracing nowadays?
Can you also provide the annual profits and incomes, before and after tax of all the other simracing studio's?
Would also like to be informed on future management updates.

WE ALL KNOW WHY THIS IS POSTED HERE!
 
This is the company that Sega should've bought. There European studio are pretty autonomous, just clean the whole thing, change the name and go.
 
really hope S397 is able to escape from this mess and find funding elsewhere. I know rF2 is, uh, controversial, but that doesn't mean the devs themselves deserve to get caught up in this mess. (more selfishly, it's my favorite sim and I don't want to see it go away like this!)
Up till now rf2 development is not really suffering from the mess MSG is. It seems to be the only thing they are doing right. If MSG would go belly up, I hope the nice people at S397 will find a new home and funding, because rF2 is still my favourite sim.
 
Great to see MSG making changes to right the ship. I'm sure we soon see the plan to bring out world class sim titles. Should be exciting. You're an optimist, aren't you? ;)
Does this help: sarcasm - the use of remarks that clearly mean the opposite of what they say, made in order to criticize something in a humorous way: E.G. - "Great to see MSG making changes to right the ship. I'm sure we soon see the plan to bring out world class sim titles. Should be exciting."
 
Is this the Financial Times of simracing nowadays?
Can you also provide the annual profits and incomes, before and after tax of all the other simracing studio's?
Would also like to be informed on future management updates.

WE ALL KNOW WHY THIS IS POSTED HERE!
On RSC I post all the info I find interesting or feel that others might. With MSG, they are publicly traded so there is more information available. You can find out the finances.

Guess what other company is? Digital Bros. That's how we know AC2 is coming, and roughly when. Both I and RD/OTGG reported on that as well.

That's why it's reported. If iRacing were publicly traded I'm sure we'd be reporting about that, too.
 
Again, this is bad information Overtake. Confusion between result and cash is a common but serious mistake. You don't have a clue of what you're talking about. I don't want to sound harsh, but I always expect professionalism, whatever the job is. Just don't try to make financial analyses when you are not competent for that. Thank you.

I've already explained in anorher topic about this company how easy it was to do some make up even with more detailed figures, and how it was difficult to make conclusions, I won't get into that again. Just consult competent people for this kind of analysis or just avoid it, it wasn't necessary for this article and.it was obviously some copy of an old statement, it lowers the credibility of the whole article unfortunately.

To be fair, I met many people working in finance who were not able to make better analyses...
 
Last edited:
Regarding the funding: I always wonder who these investors are and where that money comes from. Can't imagine people with a sim racing background investing in this, and people without that background to blow money on it? Seems almost like a money laundering operation..
The most notorious one is Fernando Alonzo.
 
Back into the main topic, "Hood served as the president of Motorsport Games from April 2019 to January 2022. Beforehand, he worked as a director of 704 Games, the developers behind the NASCAR Heat games, and as a Creative Director and Chief Game Designer for Codemasters."

For which games did he work exactly? As a developper, what was his position? What were his responsabilities and which games was he involved at codemasters? NASCAR Heat series became interesting with the 4th game (the 5th being a copy paste with a few good updates). Each Codemasters game is different in terms of gameplay ans technical quality from the previous and the next one. I don't see any puece of information making this nomination positive.

Any experience in running a company? It seems NO.

Any experience in strategy? It seems NO.

Any financkal background and global knowledge of a big company? NO. Ah great, the person in charge before, who has been able to successfully raise funds by lying and who lost money, is still there to kee on managing the fknance and help the managing board ; what a good piece of news.

And this is how shareholders lose money and how people lose their job, by nominating the wrong people to crucial positions. No magic there, just common sense.

Well, maybe the people with these skills are there somewhere in the company (so why aren't they in charge?). The most important thing is delivering projects on time without awful bugs. It seems Nascar Ignition isn't a bad game in its design, just a bad technological software. I would rather know what was wrong and what is going to be changed. Will there be any audit, and which company or intern position will be in charge? Tje whome point is there. Because the initialnpromise and agressive strategy was right. The execution was bad.
 
Last edited:
Back into the main topic, "Hood served as the president of Motorsport Games from April 2019 to January 2022. Beforehand, he worked as a director of 704 Games, the developers behind the NASCAR Heat games, and as a Creative Director and Chief Game Designer for Codemasters."

For which games did he work exactly? As a developper, what was his position? What were his responsabilities and which games was he involved at codemasters? NASCAR Heat series became interesting with the 4th game (the 5th being a copy paste with a few good updates). Each Codemasters game is different in terms of gameplay ans technical quality from the previous and the next one. I don't see any puece of information making this nomination positive.

Any experience in running a company? It seems NO.

Any experience in strategy? It seems NO.

Any financkal background and global knowledge of a big company? NO. Ah great, the person in charge before, who has been able to successfully raise funds by lying and who lost money, is still there to kee on managing the fknance and help the managing board ; what a good piece of news.

And this is how shareholders lose money and how people lose their job, by nominating the wrong people to crucial positions. No magic there, just common sense.

Well, maybe the people with these skills are there somewhere in the company (so why aren't they in charge?). The most important thing is delivering projects on time without awful bugs. It seems Nascar Ignition isn't a bad game in its design, just a bad technological software. I would rather know what was wrong and what is going to be changed. Will there be any audit, and which company or intern position will be in charge? Tje whome point is there. Because the initialnpromise and agressive strategy was right. The execution was bad.
The only place I know Hoods name from is when he was in charge of the codes F1 series in the earlier days
 
Back into the main topic, "Hood served as the president of Motorsport Games from April 2019 to January 2022. Beforehand, he worked as a director of 704 Games, the developers behind the NASCAR Heat games, and as a Creative Director and Chief Game Designer for Codemasters."

For which games did he work exactly? As a developper, what was his position? What were his responsabilities and which games was he involved at codemasters? NASCAR Heat series became interesting with the 4th game (the 5th being a copy paste with a few good updates). Each Codemasters game is different in terms of gameplay ans technical quality from the previous and the next one. I don't see any puece of information making this nomination positive.

Any experience in running a company? It seems NO.

Any experience in strategy? It seems NO.

Any financkal background and global knowledge of a big company? NO. Ah great, the person in charge before, who has been able to successfully raise funds by lying and who lost money, is still there to kee on managing the fknance and help the managing board ; what a good piece of news.

And this is how shareholders lose money and how people lose their job, by nominating the wrong people to crucial positions. No magic there, just common sense.

Well, maybe the people with these skills are there somewhere in the company (so why aren't they in charge?). The most important thing is delivering projects on time without awful bugs. It seems Nascar Ignition isn't a bad game in its design, just a bad technological software. I would rather know what was wrong and what is going to be changed. Will there be any audit, and which company or intern position will be in charge? Tje whome point is there. Because the initialnpromise and agressive strategy was right. The execution was bad.
Big wall of text to cover the simple truth: a company that burns tens of millions (25-35) a year and make around 5-7 millions at best is a money pit and is unlikely to last long. Unless money comes for free from other businesses. There is no way around that.
 
Last edited:
Big wall of text to cover the simple truth: a company that burns tens of millions (25-35) a year and make around 5-7 millions at best is a money pit and is unlikely to last long. Unless money comes for free from other businesses. There is no way around that.
That's not that simple. You don't know what the shareholders' objectives are, you don't know which assets have been bought or built for years, tou even don't know when the next games qre forecasted. A new CEO comes new objectives, that's all we are able to conclude. Again, analysing companies doesn't work with so little information.
 
The only place I know Hoods name from is when he was in charge of the codes F1 series in the earlier days
The games series with no mouse support? Which took years to add VR although the same engine had been using properly VR in other games for years? The stuttering fest in some games? The non analog clutch for classic cars? F1 2015 never fixed deadzone? :D
Ok I admit I had fun with some of these games though... i wish him to succeed in his mission, at the end, we don't want people losing their jobs and potential good games to be canceled.
 
Last edited:
The games series with no mouse support? Which took years to add VR although the same engine had been using properly VR in other games for years? The stuttering fest in some games? The non analog clutch for classic cars? F1 2015 never fixed deadzone? :D
Ok I admit I had fun with some of these games though... i wish him to qucceed in his mission, at the end, we don't w1nt people losing their jobs and potential good games to be canceled.
Yep, that's it. I stopped buying the f1 series specifically due to lack of mouse support and native support of my shakers and wheel display working at the same time
 
That's not that simple. You don't know what the shareholders' objectives are, you don't know which assets have been bought or built for years, tou even don't know when the next games qre forecasted. A new CEO comes new objectives, that's all we are able to conclude. Again, analysing companies doesn't work with so little information.
Sure it is not so simple but it is also sure that shareholders are not there to burn tens of millions every year.
Also, although we do not have their revenues plan, I don't think the games they have in the pipe are going to be remotely close to generating 20-30M margins per year realistically.
There is a reason if their stock value went from $30 to less than $1 and all of the financial games they made by merging 10 stocks into 1 still did not stop the slump as they lost again half of their value in a couple of months and are down to $5 (equivalent to $0.5 pre-merging).
Time will tell.
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Jacob (OverTake)
Article read time
3 min read
Views
7,632
Comments
44
Last update

What would be the ideal raceday for you to join our Club Races?

  • Monday

    Votes: 34 15.5%
  • Tuesday

    Votes: 27 12.3%
  • Wednesday

    Votes: 30 13.6%
  • Thursday

    Votes: 28 12.7%
  • Friday

    Votes: 77 35.0%
  • Saturday

    Votes: 124 56.4%
  • Sunday

    Votes: 88 40.0%
Back
Top