2024 Formula One Bahrain Grand Prix

image_2024-03-01_094454895.png

WHO ARE YOU ROOTING FOR IN BAHRAIN THIS WEEKEND?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
The long winter break is finally over, Formula One is back! With more drama taking place over the break than an episode of a British Soap show, here is everything you need to know heading into the first race weekend of the year.

Image Credit: Formula One

Red Bull.jpg

Image Credit: Getty Images / Red Bull Content Pool

The winter break has come to an end. Pre-season testing is complete. The teams, drivers and cars are all rearing to go. But who comes into this weekend with high expectations? Red Bull is the obvious choice, but if free practice is anything to go by at all; it won't necessarily be plain sailing for the Milton Keynes-based outfit.

Is History Due To Repeat Itself?

The Bahrain International Circuit is located just outside the growing metropolis of Sakir. The Grand Prix layout, identical to that used in pre-season testing just one week ago is a 5.4-kilometre track comprised of 15 corners, most of which involve heavy braking zones. This circuit is considered to be one of the more challenging venues for cars and drivers especially due to the heat. A perfect ground for testing and the opening round of the season.

Looking back to the 2014 race, could we see the rejuvenation of Sergio Perez to give Max Verstappen a duel in the desert? Or maybe Charles Leclerc or Lando Norris will be the chosen ones?


Last year in Bahrain, Verstappen and Red Bull cleared off into the distance to claim an easy first win for the Dutchman. His Mexican teammate, Perez, followed him home for a one-two. Mercedes and Ferrari especially will be on a mission to disrupt the Red Bull party in Sakhir this year.

2024 Testing Winners And Losers

Winner: Ferrari
Carlos Sainz came out of Testing in front, but a lot can change between the end of testing and the first race weekend. The Prancing Horses are always strong pre-season, but can they retain this pace consistently throughout the season? Will Sainz be 100% committed come the second half of the season with his future up in the air?

1709286095815.png

Image Credit: Formula One

Loser: Alpine
Eighth in the mileage standings, Alpine have kept their proverbial cards close to their chest. Team boss Bruno Famin said they completed their planned programme – however, they clocked up 200 fewer kilometres compared to what they achieved last year.

1709285820705.png

Image Credit: Clive Rose & Getty Images

Winner: RB
Perhaps the dark horse of pre-season testing, RB came out of the gates kicking with Daniel Ricciardo putting the team inside the top five on each of the last two days of running. With a front and rear end adopted from the 2023 Red Bull, there's no doubt that both Ricciardo and Yuki Tsunoda will be close to the front.

RB CA.jpg

Image Credit: Getty Images / Red Bull Content Pool

Loser: Aston Martin
Before you get your pitchfork and torch, hear me out... Aston Martin showed a mediocre and inconsistent pace throughout the testing days. However, a car that is designed around receiving upgrades could mean that the best is yet to come for Lawrence Stroll's beloved Astons.

1709287055669.png

Image Credit: Formula One

So who do you think Bahrain will favour? Will Red Bull reign supreme again? Or can Ferrari and Mercedes upset the balance of Verstappen's charging bull?
About author
Connor Minniss
Website Content Editor & Motorsport Photographer aiming to bring you the best of the best within the world of sim racing.

Comments

lol what?you mean you and other 50 dudes caring about wec in the entire world?lol no one in the world cares or knows anything about wec, sorry it hurts apparently xD
Popularity is the only thing F1 has on its favour, cause in every other aspect of the product it falls flat in the face, and you are failing to offer a compelling argument.

I don't need to be part of a big crowd to enjoy motorsports. Do you?
 
Do you need cool multiple different angles with superzooms in order to make an overtake look good ? Sounds like the racing sucks if something like this is necessary to bring excitement to it.

Sad thing is they have one proper camera in turn one, or basically every single turn yet they go out of their way to make what is happening unreadable.
I don't "need".... but i like :) specially when the circuits are so flat and dull.
 
I agree that Bernie did business differently to how most would like to see it conducted, and I feel that in his old age he put a little too much trust into the brown envelope along with the 'paperwork' so much so that it wasn't his idea or even ok that put the Mercedes at the front of the field but Martin Whitmarsh, who was then the boss of McLaren and the President of the F1 teams association, and as Renault proposed a 1.4 liter turbo 4 pot he on behalf of Mercedes proposed the V6 1 6 liter and the teams edged that way given the sparse choice.
Bernie said it was too quiet and not powerful enough, it wouldn't be exciting enough, and he was right.
Bernie, like Ron Dennis was pushed out of his own office by trust and backstabbing, both of these dinosaurs are, I feel, a great loss to F1, as, if it were down to Bernie we wouldn't have this farce we have now, and Ron would have had the McLaren team back at the front, he gave them all bar two of their championships.
Bernie this, Bernie that. Bernie had no power over technical regulations if he couldn't coerce the FIA president. And Todt was much stronger than both Balestre and Mosley; like many before him, Ecclestone was powerless against the french's intelligence and sheer force of will. It was Jean's leadership who had the vision of transforming the series from team/constructors based, to manufacturer based. And on practical terms, he succeded. Whether that was the best for the sport and we, the fans, that's a different matter of discussion.
 
Last edited:
Premium
Bernie this, Bernie that. Bernie had no power over technical regulations if he couldn't coerce the FIA president. And Todt was much stronger than both Balestre and Mosley; like many before him, Ecclestone was powerless against the french's intelligence and sheer force of will. It was Jean's leadership who had the vision of transforming the series from team/constructors based, to manufacturer based. And on practical terms, he succeded. Whether that was the best for the sport and we, the fans, that's a different matter of discussion.
Yeah, and look what Todt's vision has left us with, 1000 hp cars flatbed trailers* that need special tracks to drive safely on, and dozens of people to make em go.

For me now F1 has lost it's team appeal, it's more about drivers and their drives that the car or the place.

*almost identical that if all were painted the same colour we'd likely not tell one from the other.
 
Yeah, and look what Todt's vision has left us with, 1000 hp cars flatbed trailers* that need special tracks to drive safely on, and dozens of people to make em go.

For me now F1 has lost it's team appeal, it's more about drivers and their drives that the car or the place.

*almost identical that if all were painted the same colour we'd likely not tell one from the other.
I'm not disagreeing with you regarding the state of the series though. Just saying that it is not all Bernie's doing: he had influence in the technical side of the sport, until Todt entered the office and kicked him out, sending him back to strictly economical business, which was his actual job. So he definitely continued to do harm, but just where he belonged.
 
Funny how many Lewis Hamilton fans now sing the tune of "its not the driver, it's the car", and F1 is boring, i rather watch something else. Where was that speech a few years ago, when your favorite driver was cleaning up?...
Just have to add; My nose wrinkling in my starting post has zero to do with having specific driver as sweet pet. In fact I've not had for decades.

But so many things went wrong with what should be the pinnacle class of motorsport that I have hard times to fully summarize.

However, when the strife between a new generation of "ultra" fans of two drivers in particular reached new heights at the end of the season, I can imagine that this one-dimensionality fills them now as their pet is fading.
As if the class hadn't become one-dimensional and artificial enough already...
 
Last edited:
I have decided to cure my insomnia by going to a F1 race this year. I am soliciting the community's opinion on which race it should be. There are a couple of caveats.

1. It can't be Miami, Las Vegas, Austin or Monaco.
2. I don't need a long explanation on why YOU would go to that particular race.

Just pick a race and the most votes wins. Thanks,.
Saudi Arabia
 
Teams having runs of domination don't really bother me. It happens in every sport. Think Lakers, Steelers, ManU, Yankees, Chiefs, Celtics, Bulls, UCLA.

What gets me is the "manufactured" sports we are seeing now. Goofball rules to "drawn in more viewers.

1. Professional US Baseball : A time clock, replay
2. Professional US Basketball: In Season Tournament, replay
3. Professional US Football: Diminished Quarterback Contact, replay
4:. Professional US Hockey: Passing Across Multiple Lines, overtime shootout
5: NASCAR: Crashfests the last 2 laps causing caution finishes
6. F1: DRS
7: Professional Tennis: No one handed backhands( just kidding)

Sport is no longer sport. It's entertainment. If that is what the product is, there has to be something to keep people interested no matter how wacky it is.

If F1 was truly a "sport" there would be independent teams. But there is no way, with the huge buy in required, that a group of dudes who love racing is going to get into F1. The Williams type of team is over.

So you are going to get Merc hot for some years, Red Bull hot for some years. Eventually Aston Martin will get hot, as will Mclaren. That is how they will keep us coming back for more.

I actually think most of these things are good. Sometimes you have to change the rules to make things better and I’m alright with that.

First off, I think the reviews take too long, but I’m not against using replay to get calls correct in any sport.

1) baseball games were too slow and taking too long, especially for a sport that happens every night. So I think pitch clock helps both consumers and players.
2) in season tournament (along with new participation rules) made otherwise worthless feeling regular season games meaningful and really cut down on all the healthy scratches and “load management.”
3) with all the problems we know occur with CTE, it makes sense to try to protect players with the rules. I’m expecting more changes to protect other players too, and I support that goal.
4) I don’t watch enough hockey these days to comment on rules, but league seems to be doing much better in terms of popularity and financial security than when I was a child. So they must have gotten something right.
5) I do think NASCAR rules favor winning a bit too much over consistency and are overly complicated. Things like the playoff repair time clock feel wholly unnecessary.
6) DRS has simply made overtaking that should occur more possible. Otherwise the air turbulence was causing a train were you could only overtake if the person ahead made a gross mistake or your car was literally 3+ seconds a lap faster. I respect everyone’s opinion, but I think DRS is more helpful than harmful ultimately.

Yes, sport is somewhat entertainment. Changing some rules a bit to improve the show (or make the sport safer/less reliant on perfect human officiating) makes sense for all parties involved. Out of the given examples I think only NASCAR has gone too far in terms of artificially creating competition moments. However, NASCAR doesn’t have any obligation to keep their racing “pure.” As long as the rules don’t change on the fly (e.g. Abu Dhabi finale lap cars debacle,) then more power to them for being willing to create the product and niche they envisioned.
 
Premium
Watched both F1 opener and WEC opener. First time in years F1 left me cold. WEC is more interesting.
Have been watching F1 since 1988.
 
Yes and i hope it stays that way. Trying to appeal to "casuals" is what ruined F1. Let WEC in peace for the real motorsport fans.
real motorsport fans?lol fans of an event where they DECIDE who wins what and who wins when through bop?oh, i see.
 
Yes, sport is somewhat entertainment.
Pro sport is *only* entertainment unless you pratice it yourself. When I ride my bike, I'm exercising. When I watch the Tour de France, I'm being entertained by the sight of athletes doing on their bikes something I could never do myself.

Without spectators and TV viewers, no sport can survive.
 
Last edited:
Did you really pass the "Captcha" when signing up to this site, or did you get a friend to do it?
i'm really sorry that the truth everyone in the world knows hurts so bad for you :(.. i hope your mum can help you and hug you.
 
lol what?you mean you and other 50 dudes caring about wec in the entire world?lol no one in the world cares or knows anything about wec, sorry it hurts apparently xD
You DO realise WEC INCLUDES Le Mans....y'know that small litle race in france that not many people around the world have heard of....NOT.

ANYONE who has an interest in 4 wheeled motorsports knows ALL about Le Mans.
 
real motorsport fans?lol fans of an event where they DECIDE who wins what and who wins when through bop?oh, i see.
Funny, now you bring the BOP up? IF you think F1 is any way shape or form "fair", you know even less about motorsports than i thought...

(note, i dont like BOp either, but F1 has its own "BOP" now, so this is a moot point anyways).
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Connor Minniss
Article read time
3 min read
Views
8,330
Comments
107
Last update

What would be the ideal raceday for you to join our Club Races?

  • Monday

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Tuesday

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Wednesday

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Thursday

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Friday

    Votes: 2 66.7%
  • Saturday

    Votes: 3 100.0%
  • Sunday

    Votes: 1 33.3%
Back
Top