Usually i don't wanna talk with hatred towards something or someone but i just couldn't resist but to write this down, to have some little "chat" for it, what really gives him the right to speak of how Vettel was good, or did he was a legend, is not, or anything at all. I couldn't be any less confused, when i read, that he (Vettel) needed to win a slower car, to win from the back or something like that, so when he did that, then he could have been called a Legend. Now, i was wondering, why he bothers to say that to the media or even why to come up and say those things, is he afraid of the fact that he(Vettel) is now regarded, not only by titles, as the no.1 of this generation(even though he is 6-7y younger) through the opinions from almost, everyone in F1, so he is making it fast to say what he has to say? Guess what, me personally - i don't care. I wonder, who does at all. He is a 2 time world Champion, what he says is cheap talk. Vettel for now is silent and i know he will remain that way. As he did in 2012 but spoke on the track. I know there are many who are fans of Alonso, i myself regard him as one of the best of this generation, but being real he is not that good as many are considering him to be, but i am not going to argue about that. So from what I understand Fernando has to prove he's a legend too... What has he won since he left Renault and had the best car? He only took advantage of mechanical issues of others in 2010 and 2012...even the loss in 2010 was his own fault. And i can prove if i just find the article that was written just after final practice and before the race in Monaco! He speaks how others had slower cars or Vettel's was from different universe. If he wants to prove something with what he has said, then why he tried to move to Red Bull ? Or, he was trying to get himself in the best car too. Wasn't he afraid people might say what he has just said to Vettel? Another things, i watch F1 since 98, and i think i understood many from all these years watching F1. What i have noticed is that the credit given to the Champions is relative thing. What i am trying to say might not everyone understand me right now. Try this: - When Schumacher was winning from 2000-04, afterwards, i can speak for myself only, i met too much people saying "He won them because there was no real contenders" Is that true, or he was just that good that made them to look that way, i for sure won't know but i do know he was the best! Is for real that Vettel had that good car or he just made them look that way? Truth is there will be always people complaining about everything. Me myself i don't look that way. I know people who are doing that even disrespecting any of the 4 titles Vettel won and i have never said a word of how Hamilton won it or Alonso, or how Raikkonen's was a total 100% set-up from the moment the contract was made with the spy-gate, between Ferrari and Mclaren and i knew it and if i could i would have put my house on a bet for that! Truth is, you won't become a Champion if u r loud, but silent patient and hard working, in the moment i see he is loud, not patient and i doubt if he is hard working. Not like there is a rule or something, but you understood my point from all of this.