Xosé Estrada
Premium
If you look at my posts this week, we noticed there is a problem with vote change in actual forum.
No penalty --> 1
+15 --> 2
+30 --> 3
+60 --> 0
NP --> 0
NP NQ --> 0
NP DQ --> 4
In this fictional situation, the driver would be DQ even if 60% of teams think he deserves +30 secs or less, and that is not fair. In our previous forum, the teams were changing votes to feed the most similar of the majoritary options, so at the end we always finished with 2 voted options and a clear decision. Now this is not technically possible so we have to do it manually.
To prevent doing successive voting rounds, where normally teams will vote the most similar option to their original one, I said (before this last voting on post #33) that I would add the +15 and +30 votes to the most voted of the two options, in this case +30, because in a second successive voting between +30 and +60 the teams voting +15 will go for sure to +30. Doing this we avoid to do like 4 voting rounds and the result is exactly the same, with 50% of teams willing a +60 sec penalty and 50% of teams willing +30 secs or less penalty.
What I did in the conclusion is make an average, +30 secs time penalty but the hardest penalty applied automatically if this happens again, which is in the middle of just +30 or just +60 secs.
Cya.
No penalty --> 1
+15 --> 2
+30 --> 3
+60 --> 0
NP --> 0
NP NQ --> 0
NP DQ --> 4
In this fictional situation, the driver would be DQ even if 60% of teams think he deserves +30 secs or less, and that is not fair. In our previous forum, the teams were changing votes to feed the most similar of the majoritary options, so at the end we always finished with 2 voted options and a clear decision. Now this is not technically possible so we have to do it manually.
To prevent doing successive voting rounds, where normally teams will vote the most similar option to their original one, I said (before this last voting on post #33) that I would add the +15 and +30 votes to the most voted of the two options, in this case +30, because in a second successive voting between +30 and +60 the teams voting +15 will go for sure to +30. Doing this we avoid to do like 4 voting rounds and the result is exactly the same, with 50% of teams willing a +60 sec penalty and 50% of teams willing +30 secs or less penalty.
What I did in the conclusion is make an average, +30 secs time penalty but the hardest penalty applied automatically if this happens again, which is in the middle of just +30 or just +60 secs.
Cya.
lus1:
![Luca [OT]](/data/avatars/s/3235/3235113.jpg?1697196734){kind=avatar}