• Racing is not a matter of life and death. It's much more important than that!
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. There's no such thing as a stupid question.

Dirty air

Discussion in 'Formula SimRacing' started by Chris de Jong, Jul 2, 2014.

  1. Chris de Jong

    Chris de Jong

    Messages:
    529
    Ratings:
    +215
    Hey guys!

    I was wondering about your opinions about the dirty air with the physics we are using now.
    Silverstone was really a challenge, to see 2 cars going trough copse corner with the guy following having to lift because he thinks his front wing is missing instead, its just the dirty air.
    After the maggots beckets complex how do you think sector 1 of suzuka will be like?
    I would like to know your opinions on these matters because i think a lot of people struggled with this unrealistic form of aerodynamics to a point where it gets frustrated.
    I dont know if there is even a possibility to change these physics but im certainly wondering what your opinions of this matter are.
    at some tracks its possibly better to let someone go for 1-1.5 seconds in order to not be affected by the dirty air.
    Silverstone it was just epic to see specially trough copse where people automaticly lost 5-7 tenths when they where "to close behind their opponent"
    Might be im the only one who asks questions on the credibility on this matter but im really looking forward to your replies!

    ps.
    For certain people dont put this out of proportion.

    Greetings,
    Tom Hanks
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Thomas Satherley

    Thomas Satherley

    Messages:
    59
    Ratings:
    +18
    I don't have a problem with it. Its apart of high downforce (due to wings) racing
     
  3. Primaguida

    Primaguida

    Messages:
    293
    Ratings:
    +153
    I think it's realistic and I like it. I hope it will remain like this.

    See you soon Tom,
    Bud Spencer
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Ville Leppala

    Ville Leppala

    Messages:
    328
    Ratings:
    +241
    Tbh this was probably the track where the dirty air is worst and its not like it was a surprise to anyone. There was a vote of this in the start of the season and even Bono made a video of the exact corner and how bad the dirty air was so i dont really understand why people start questioning this now. Imo there hasnt been any problems overtaking wise before last race if even there, I think there were plenty of overtakes in every race. Also Suzuka s1 wont be as bad as silverstone was because it doesnt get even close speed wise to silverstone. I think its fine as it is atm.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. David Dominguez

    David Dominguez

    Messages:
    2,404
    Ratings:
    +1,264
  6. Ho3n3r

    Ho3n3r

    Messages:
    4,994
    Ratings:
    +1,491
    It can probably be lessened a bit, as long as it's not made too easy, like it was in rFactor 1...
     
  7. Georg Winter

    Georg Winter

    Messages:
    502
    Ratings:
    +146
    (from other Thread)

    Ya and if you use a high downforce setup you`re not able to pass on straight. Dirty air should be reduced. Maybe by 20%. I dont see that much dirty air at F1. We have same downforce level like F1, so we should use the same dirty air level...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Martin Hodás

    Martin Hodás

    Messages:
    207
    Ratings:
    +43
    Thats what I was talking about in that other thread... just to reduce it slightly
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. David Dominguez

    David Dominguez

    Messages:
    2,404
    Ratings:
    +1,264
    As I said, it's a compromise. Also what you said is not true, he managed to pass fast guys like Patrik and Alvaro on fast sections (even though Alvaro re-passed him later with a very nice and risky move).

    You don't see that much dirty air at F1, but car performances aren't also equal like here.

    Instead of complaining try to find better compromises on the setup. I told the same to my drivers some days ago ;)
     
  10. Marcel van der Linden

    Marcel van der Linden

    Messages:
    135
    Ratings:
    +67
    Well the dirty air is nasty... but with a bit more lift off and then full throttle again (depending on setup to) u dont loose that much. Well... u loose time but not that much. Just test it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Patrik Holzmann

    Patrik Holzmann

    Messages:
    38
    Ratings:
    +27
    easier said than done;)
     
  12. Patrik Holzmann

    Patrik Holzmann

    Messages:
    38
    Ratings:
    +27
    There is no reason to reduce the dirty air , as david already said jonny is the best example for it . He surely lost some overall laptime pace but it was a brilliant overtake setup especially for the 2nd race.
     
  13. Carlos Martín

    Carlos Martín

    Messages:
    1,012
    Ratings:
    +387
    Being on dirty air isn't like reducing wing angle, it's more than that. Lets say for example, if you are in the slipstream and you win 10 kph you have less downforce than having wings for 10 kph extra without slipstream. Why? Easy, when you are on dirty air your downforce is reduced in all aspects, including the downforce generated by the diffusor, which is the main downforce generator on the car.

    Just imagine for a moment your Silverstone set with 10 kph extra due less wing angle, you would lose a great amount of time, right? Therefore the slipstream should force you to lose even more time.

    I see it pretty correct at the moment, no reason to change.

    We either see many overtakes in Silverstone/Suzuka due circuit characteristics.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Tume

    Tume
    The unlucky Finn

    Messages:
    1,463
    Ratings:
    +330
    Also take into account, that car performances are equal. In F1 it's fair to say Mercedes could overtake a Caterham fairly quick even when losing downforce due to the dirty air.
     
  15. Dmitry Zaharov

    Dmitry Zaharov

    Messages:
    1,591
    Ratings:
    +396
    I would say "try it". If anything goes wrong you can always revert to the original. I'm sure a lot of people will like closer racing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1