• "I'm going to pee in your seat" - Jenson Button
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. There's no such thing as a stupid question.

Calendar update

Discussion in 'Formula SimRacing' started by John-Eric Saxén, May 15, 2014.

  1. John-Eric Saxén

    John-Eric Saxén

    Messages:
    1,323
    Ratings:
    +717
    Below is the slightly updated 2014 race calendar, note that round 4 has switched tracks due to poor/ancient track quality.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. danielino

    danielino

    Messages:
    134
    Ratings:
    +83
    Melbourne :cry:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Tume

    Tume
    The unlucky Finn

    Messages:
    1,468
    Ratings:
    +330
    San Marino? Indianapolis? :O_o:
     
  4. stop

    stop

    Messages:
    313
    Ratings:
    +51
    Why remove Melbourne? I mean I'm happy that San Marino is on cos its a good tribute to Senna but why remove Melbourne when San Marino could've been in the second free space? The version of Melbourne is brilliant
     
  5. Carlos Martín

    Carlos Martín

    Messages:
    1,012
    Ratings:
    +387
    I just miss Brazil as last GP.

    Anyway the administration has their own reason to change Melbourne.
     
  6. David Dominguez

    David Dominguez

    Messages:
    2,431
    Ratings:
    +1,317
    Indianapolis has been selected because ISI will release the track quite soon, and the quality will be obviously very high.

    Melbourne has been replaced by San Marino because it's a very old design, quality is not very good and I'd need too much time to work on it. San Marino on the other hand is practically ready since the Winter Series, and that allows me to have more time to work on Canada, which needs an important update as well.
     
    Last edited: May 15, 2014
    • Like Like x 3
  7. John-Eric Saxén

    John-Eric Saxén

    Messages:
    1,323
    Ratings:
    +717
    I first had Melbourne included because it seemed not completely hopeless case from cockpit cam. When looking at trackside (screenshot) the GP4 graphics from 2002 are quite obvious. Also there are some issues with car reflections etc. I understand David wants to work on newer tracks and it's not really worth effort trying to make 12-year old track look decent.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Dian Kostadinov

    Dian Kostadinov

    Messages:
    469
    Ratings:
    +194
    No NOOOOOO, no Melbourne, no Monaco, what are you doing guys, for what we're paying licenses, for 12 races and **** tracks. I understand is not your fault now, but you can fix it example put Melbourne later in calendar, just move Canada for it's place to be on 1st of June, then Silverstone on 15th and etc.. That was my favourite track with Monaco, so please I believe there are more many guys which think like me, I think you can fix it in next few months example the long break in summer. I didn't vote for that kind a calendar, I remember my vote was the last vote and I voted for 12 tracks, because I didn't find it that bad with few exceptions like Monaco. I don't like this decision and I hope to think what I've said and to find out a solution in other way.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  9. stop

    stop

    Messages:
    313
    Ratings:
    +51
    Doesn't look bad IMO. You call this terrible?


     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Eduard Mallorquí

    Eduard Mallorquí

    Messages:
    696
    Ratings:
    +248
    Of course it's a shame to miss tracks like Melbourne or Monaco but for now we only have David working on the tracks and it takes him a massive amount of time. Also rF2 makes things a lot more complicated than they should be.
     
  11. John-Eric Saxén

    John-Eric Saxén

    Messages:
    1,323
    Ratings:
    +717
    As I said, it's remotely ok from cockpit. Broadcast is mainly trackside cam and they really show it's a 2002 track, just too old tech for our use. Besides, all the cutting places would have to be fixed. I don't think it's realistic to expect David work all summer on these GP4 tracks when we can simply replace them with something better. Also it makes rF2 look very bad if we decide to drive on poor conversions.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Ron Squire

    Ron Squire

    Messages:
    2,401
    Ratings:
    +950
    2 races in america, should Indy be called the East USA GP and Texas the West USA GP
     
  13. David Dominguez

    David Dominguez

    Messages:
    2,431
    Ratings:
    +1,317
    Sorry to disappoint you but the decision is final. I understand that you like the track, and I can tell you that I also like Melbourne a lot. But it's a 2001 track and the modeling is quite poor for 2014 standards; not only that but also the textures are incredibly oversaturated, as you can check on that video and JES screenshot (well they are ok for rF1, but in rF2 you have to tweak them heavily to look properly under HDR).

    As administrators we have to look for a decent amount of quality; I know that some people don't care at all about the quality and they would run 2000 era tracks forever, but we want something better than that. Tracks like China, Imola etc should be the minimum required in terms of quality nowadays, and personally I do believe they are quite on the limit; after all they were made for rF1 engines.

    And anyway afterall Imola and Indianapolis used to be F1 tracks, so it's not like if we decided to race at Poznan :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Morgan Morand

    Morgan Morand

    Messages:
    316
    Ratings:
    +461
    You will use the Imola version of Winter series ?? oO
    Oh my god... the race will be so boring, we have already so much difficulties to overtake with that car and you choose the worst track for overtakes... and in this version, the track fidelity is not that good :sick:
    Have you considered the Hungaroring track released for rf2 ???



    What about Nordschleife ? :D used by F1 long time ago
    It would be awesome to race with F1 there... :inlove:
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
  15. David Dominguez

    David Dominguez

    Messages:
    2,431
    Ratings:
    +1,317
    Yeah Hungaroring is much better for overtaking.

    /sarcasm off
     
    • Haha Haha x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. Georg Winter

    Georg Winter

    Messages:
    502
    Ratings:
    +146
    Nordschleife would be great Morgan :) Maybe we can do it as an event in the summer break?
    eeehm. bad that Imola is that early in calendar. There is a good version of it in Assetto Corsa. It should be convertible. it looks exactly the same like real ^^
     
  17. Eduard Mallorquí

    Eduard Mallorquí

    Messages:
    696
    Ratings:
    +248
    Imola looks very nice in AC, but when converting it to rF2 it gets totally destroyed because the graphic engine is quite bad. It's not so easy to do a proper conversion.
     
  18. Dian Kostadinov

    Dian Kostadinov

    Messages:
    469
    Ratings:
    +194
    Imola is more boring than Hungaroring David. In Imola we're gonna do laps bellow 60s without the last chicane.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. Ron Squire

    Ron Squire

    Messages:
    2,401
    Ratings:
    +950
    would nordscliefe be used in rf2? (sorry if its a stupid question)
     
  20. Chris Knight

    Chris Knight

    Messages:
    679
    Ratings:
    +99
    anything but imola urgg now seasons ruined without melbourne my fave track :'(

    looked at video posted and melbourne looks better than china were racing on this weekend...