Doesn't support well resolution and aspect ratios. Previews depend on authors 1920x1080px 1.77777 ratio and his mouse sensitivity. The way to get around it and get reasonable previews is to disable the deformative downscaling that ignores aspect ratio and setup your own mouse movement based on your resolution and mouse sensitivity. No option to generate preview only for one skin. No FOV option, neither AC showroom seems to respect it in it's cfg. No direct camera positioning.
57MB for a simple UI app... either it has 10million lines of code or the Node-Webkit takes so much ridiculous space to make an executable.
Usable but I fear the day it crashes and messes up the whole AC and I'm gonna be looking for back up files to revert the mess back. Haven't seen any back up files so far either.
> Doesn't support well resolution and aspect ratios.
Of course, sorry about that. I'll fix deformative downscaling.
> mouse sensitivity
As far as I understand, acShowroom's rotate angle directly depends on PC perfomance.
> No option to generate preview only for one skin
Well, I think it's useless until app can't set the same angles between shot sessions.
> No FOV option, neither AC showroom seems to respect it in it's cfg.
Ok, I'll add it.
> No direct camera positioning.
Please, please, write to Kunos directly (@KunosStefano, for example) and ask them to make acShowroom to read CUSTOM_CAMERA_POS or whatever is in showroom_start.ini. Because for now it looks like app ignores them. And also it looks like they ignore me. :D
Or, if you know anybody who is good with IDA and stuff, I would really use some help.
> 57MB for a simple UI app
Yes, I hate it too. And also I've tried really hard to compress it as much as possible. But stuff like UPX, as far as I know, increases RAM consumption even more.
> Node-Webkit takes so much ridiculous space to make an executable.
About 80 megabytes. It's basically just Chromium with Node.JS and some extra features. A little scary when you think about it.
By the way, I've just tried to rewrite everything using just C#+WPF (http://i.imgur.com/OLqOOJb.png). Much more stable, exe-file weights less than megabyte (well, for now) and everything. But it's just SO MUCH SLOWER, and there are still a lot of things to do! So, to be honest, right now I don't even know what to do next.
> Usable but I fear the day it crashes and messes up the whole AC and I'm gonna be looking for back up files to revert the mess back. Haven't seen any back up files so far either.
Well, it doesn't have to. Don't use beta-versions it you're worried.
Sorry about all these inconvenience, as you can see I'm not a very good programmer. :3