Which do you like better?

[Brendon Pywell]

Which picture do you like best and why?

 

[banger]

erm, can't see them piddy, too small and they don't zoom out.

 

[markfaz]

I don't have my glasses with me..

 

[eno72]

they seem proposals for the icon of a new or improved tool.

The first one gives immediately the idea of what it does (control over cross sections probably), so I go for it

 

[markfaz]

Ahh.. well spotted.
I think the first is clearer.

 

[DDawg]

they seem proposals for the icon of a new or improved tool.

The first one gives immediately the idea of what it does (control over cross sections probably), so I go for it

ah .. to have young eyes again ...

 

[Brendon Pywell]

Hold control and scroll your mousewheel up, the images will get bigger.

Hold your breathe and count till next week, things will get clearer.

 

[banger]

i like the first one, after scrolling mouse+ctrl for 5 seconds,i need a plaster.

 

[jay_p_666]

The first one definately show more what the option is made for.

 

[Satangoss]

Hmmm... the left one is already into BTB interface.
It means edit track cross-section points.

I'd prefer the second one which ideally would allow edit points of track independent of cross-section, using a brush tool as terrain editor does. It's being indicated by new Piddy's signature.

Too optmistic? : )

 

[wixi]

first is to be recognized by the red line also as editiebar

 

[Brad Dibble]

I like the first because i cannot see any detail in the second nad would have no idea what the button was for.

 

[David Allak]

Hmmm... the left one is already into BTB interface.
It means edit track cross-section points.

I'd prefer the second one which ideally would allow edit points of track independent of cross-section, using a brush tool as terrain editor does. It's being indicated by new Piddy's signature.

Too optmistic? : )

I think your right, the left icon is definitely already in BTB as the edit track surface tool. So the right must be for a new tool, asking us which we prefer might imply that both will be available in the future. Not just an improved track surface editor, but a new, alternative one?
hmmmm, maybe

 

[zaxxon]

The first one says "click to edit the profile of the road".
The second one says "road related"

I like the first one if it's use is for opening the profile/materials editing tools.

 

[Martin Weare]

If they are my only choices, its a no brainer. The first one. The second just looks like a track

 

[Martin Weare]

The wizard of Arthsea could be a good starting point.

See here [ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Wizard_of_Earthsea[/ame]


Quote:
Then, with no idea how to deal with his other foe, Sparrowhawk tries to return to the safety of Roke, but the magical, protective Roke-wind drives away the ship on which he is a passenger. He finds what appears to be a safe haven, the domain of one of the Old Powers, but is nearly enslaved by the ancient guardian. He realizes his peril just in time and, taking the form of a falcon, flees yet again.

An icon of a Hawk is what I would use.

 

[rFMG]

The first one is better

 

[James Capper]

Definately the first one it's more descriptive visualy ..............classic wysiwyg

 

[Brendon Pywell]

I like the second one because it is not an icon, but just a small picture of what will be visible in the next BTB.

Here's a large picture ...

 

[Ragamuffin]

Perhaps just make the red line in the 2nd icon a bit more visible.