The Future Looks Electric… But So Did The Past!

Jamais_contente_parade.jpg


Did you know that the very first car to break the 60 mph (100 km/h) wall was an electric vehicle?


It might sound strange, but this milestone was actually achieved by the “Jamais Contente” (which means “Never Satisfied”), hitting 65.79 mph (105.88 km/h) on the 29th of April 1899, in Achères, northern France. Piloted by the valiant “Red Devil”, Belgian Camille Jenatzy, two direct drive Postel-Vinay 25 kW motors (both running at 200 Volts/124 Amperes) powered the bullet shaped car made of partinium, for an output of about 68hp. Rear wheels were driven each by one of these two motors, which were over-volted just for the time necessary to hit the record speed.

The reason why Jenatzy built this car, the very first car to be specifically designed for a land speed record attempt, was because of two reasons: first, he wanted to prove his superiority towards Gaston de Chasseloup-Laubat, who had beaten him three times already in his endeavour; secondly, because Laubat was driving for Jeantaud, which was Jenatzy’s rival company. The Belgian engineer, in fact, had started a manufacturing plant to produce carriages and trucks, in the, at the time, ever-growing electric vehicles market.

As a matter of fact, at the end of the XIX century there was a wild ongoing dispute about which technology was better suited for these newly born vehicles. Mainly three parties were involved: those voting for combustion engines, those rooting for electric drive, and the hard-core steam supporters. The "La France Automobile" magazine decided to promote some race events, in which speed of the participants was recorded on a 1km (0.6 mi) drag strip. Whoever ran fastest, was the winner. Whichever engine was quicker, had to be declared the best.

Surprisingly, the fastest and more diffused vehicles were actually electric. People liked them because they were much less noisy, did not have any smell as those associated with gasoline, and suffered zero vibrations. More on the plus side, there wear no gearboxes, as electric vehicles do not need shifting, and were far easier to start compared to combustion engines, which needed to be warmed up and to be started manually through a hand crank peeking out of the bottom of the radiator. In addition, combustion engines have a thermal efficiency of only about 27% on average, while electric drives can go as far as 90%. What this means is that of all the energy produced by a gasoline/diesel engine, only a quarter, roughly, pushes the car forward. The rest is all wasted.

In 1912, 38% of automobiles in the USA were electric driven, compared to the 22% diffusion of gasoline vehicles. Between 1897 and 1898, both Walter C. Bersey in London and Samuel's “Electric Carriage and Wagon Company” in New York even started running a fleet of electric cabs. These were infamously renamed as "Hummingbirds" due to the peculiar humming noise they made (which is still today considered the main downside of this technology).

London Electrical Cab Co.jpg


Unfortunately for electric cars, the ease of operation and the lack of sound typical of these cars stigmatized them as “for women” (again, a trend emerging in our society too), instead of being seen as actual bonuses, especially in urban traffic. Moreover, the increasing distances that cars in general needed to cover were much above the expectations of these primitive vehicles, while at the same time the discovery of many oil fields made gasoline cars more competitive on the market. At the end of the 1920es, the electric vehicle market was extinguished and all development abandoned.

Nowadays, this technology seems to be the protagonist of a mighty comeback. Tesla is about to produce both cars and trucks equipped with electric motors, boasting for both top performances, quick recharging times and long lasting distances on a single charge. It even convinced FIA to run a dedicated championship for electric GTs, the Electric Production Car Series, starting later this year. Rimac is already an established competitor in the field. Then we have Audi, BMW, Volkswagen, Porsche, Bugatti, Maserati, Pagani and Alfa Romeo, all planning out for the next four years new electric models, or already releasing ‘green vehicles’ on the market by now. This without taking in consideration many more brands, or even motorcycle companies like Cagiva, Harley Davidson and Royal Enfield, that are also moving to electric powertrains. The motorsport too is counting more and more series switching in the near future to the ‘eco-friendly’ alternative, while many new like Formula-E or Moto-E are specifically designed from the ground up to use these engines.

Even classic cars are oftentimes seeing their motors switched to electric drives. This because of preservations of their original units, which many times have no longer replacement parts or specialists available to fix them (the carb wizards breed is going towards extinction, and some companies are now offering specialised training courses to have the new generations learn this incredibly hard technique and precise discipline), and because of Emission Zones limitations. Many cities are in fact imposing restrictions to the type of vehicles allowed in their downtown zones, and classic cars are obviously out of the minimum requirements. Exceptions can be made, to models acknowledged as historically relevant by local sanctioning bodies, but these might be retracted at some point in the future.

jag-e-electric.jpg

- The 'E-type Zero' used by Prince Harry at his recent wedding is based on a 1968 Series 1½ E-type

It looks like the combustion engine is facing hard times, and that is not easy to accept. It might have all the faults and flaws of the world, but for a petrolhead, there's nothing like it. It would be a shame to be forced to use these cars only in the weekend, in some remote country road, away from judging eyes, and surely, they will get expensive to maintain as such.

At the same time, I cannot hide my excitement towards innovation. I have always liked everything that is pure – state of the art – technology, pushing our boundaries. I love anything that shows how far we got, how complex things we, as humans, are able to achieve and build for a better future. Electric drives are just the latest step, and I love them not for what they are (even though, they can look very cool at times), but for what they represent from a human standpoint. I hope I will be able to see where this will all lead, how society and humanity will be shaped by this positive change.

However, as we have seen, at the beginning of the last century it looked as well like electric vehicles were the way to go, save being supplanted instead by combustion engines. Will this happen again? Will another kind of drive take the place of electric vehicles this time too?

volkswagen-microbus-concept.jpg


Like what you see here at RaceDepartment? Don't forget to like, subscribe and follow us on social media!

RaceDepartment YouTube
RaceDepartment Twitter
RaceDepartment Facebook
RaceDepartment Twitch
RaceDepartment Instagram


What do you think? Which changes this technology might bring in our lives? Are you excited or disheartened by what it means for the future?

Let us know in the comments!
 
Last edited:
Ever visited the Louman Museum in The Hague, Netherlands? Absolutely worth a visit!
About a month ago I learned that electrical vehicles indeed already existed a long long time ago.

An example:
IMG_20180605_115623 small.jpg
BakerElectric.jpg


If you want to see more historical icons you can have a look at one of my albums
I'm sure you will see some cars you didn;t know they even exist(ed). Enjoy watching!

And again if you are in the neighborhood of The Hague and you have to pay this museum a visit
 
It's funny how people despise electric vehicles for racing when just a few days ago they beat the ICE record in the Pikes peak ! and also I was surprised to not been here posted.
Electric vehicles are just better in everything!, faster acceleration, instant response to throttel, best comfort due to no annoying vibrations... If the world never found the stupid dinojuice the electric cars would be much better. RIP to ICE cars asap please!!! :thumbsup:
 
I think it's a very natural and long over-due evolution of the automotive industry and motorsport. Electric cars offer many advantages over their ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) counterparts on both, the street and the track. With their higher power outputs, lower centre of gravity, better AWD and traction control systems and torque vectoring, I am excited to see them push motorsport to new heights. It will take some time before battery technology will advance far enough to electrify even the longest of races, but I am confident that this future will come soon enough.

Also, they do away with the dreadful sound of a controlled explosion which I, for one, welcome immensely.:inlove:
 
I guess most of us know(at least I hope that common ppl general knowledge is that good everywhere) that early speed record cars were many times electric.
 
About the poll: I dont vote for any of these options.
For racing id like to see different options for everyone.
Other than that, electric cars look more powerful than combustion engined cars, which are my favourite for emotional reasons only.

For the daily life i dont think either option is good. Electric cars dont habe less emissions overall as far as i know.
Why arent hydrogen cars more on the rise/arent developed further?


I am no expert, though...
 
Hydrogen car with a V12 (or other customizable) engine sound.

> The Future for petrolheads.

Let the Greenies think that running on electric from coal power or brown coal in German is ecofriendly. Meanwhile they can eat their vegan food full of additives to keep them healthy while we can put another one on the BBQ and decide if the Citroën DS or the Jaguar E type was the most elegant of the early 60's.
 
The main problem with electric cars or any alternative to the ICE is cost. Economies become more successful when the cost of energy goes down. This is true of vehicles too. While some will virtue signal with their automotive purchase, most people want the most economical bang for their buck. Dino fuels are cheap and plentiful with new supplies being discovered all the time. Today's batteries are light years ahead of the battery technology featured in the article from a century ago, but they are still not a viable energy source to replace the ICE. We may see a breakthrough in battery tech that will extend range, reduce weight, and manage heat and fire better, but hoping for it won't make it happen. Also there is the early adopter penalty. Talk to the folks who bought the Lotus based Tesla sports car - it is much cheaper to maintain and repair traditional cars. I'm routing for the model 3, but let's be honest, they will not sell for the same price as an ICE mid-side sedan. Infrastructure is another problem. This is today's electric car experience:
upload_2018-6-28_16-22-36.png


A couple of guys have Teslas, the local community wants to be green so taxpayers pay for "free" charging stations. Things will get nasty when there are 10 cars competing for those 2 or 3 charging stations. I owned 2006 Cayman S - it got 16 MPG. My wife has a new 718 Boxster - it gets 26 MPG. It is faster and better handling. If batteries can become 60% more efficient and improve as much as this specific ICE example in 12 years, then maybe they'll have something with electric cars.
 
Electric or hydrogen or solar or something not invented yet will be the future. This is the end of the ICE age.
In a few years/decades we'll be able to burn smelly gasoline only in sims.
And its a good thing.
 
I have a feeling these ultra-cool electric vehicles will work perfectly for the minority ultra-wealthy in a few decades while the rest of us will rely on government transportation. Still have some of these uppity middle class to beat down and diversify though. We'll get there. Telsa should have some good electric buses and for us by then and nvidia's AI should handle the rest. Amazon is getting the tech ready for our automated rations, these city centre's will be PACKED so facial recognition will be very necessary to expedite all public services.
 
Combustion: exhaust fumes, sound, vibration which all translates into passion.
Electricity: silence...nothing...dead.
Combustion all the way sir:thumbsup:
 
The same elite that changed the emerging electric norm a century ago, when a third of NY's taxis were electric, and pushed for petrol is engineering it again, this time because it's "necessary". This while tens of internal combustion engine patents lie buried in some gas company's drawer (watch "Gashole" documentary for some clues or look for Paul Pantone or Stanley Meyer's patents). Anyone working in the auto industry at this moment knows the petrol engine's death is pure politics. The truth is oil companies can no longer justify an ever rising difference between the barrel price and the pump price (in december 2016 OPEC and non-OPEC countries jointly agreed to cut supply in order to keep the price up and reduce losses). That and the fact that they keep "discovering" oil, even though around 2000 they said we'd have consumed it all by 2020. Talk about creating the idea of scarcity, the primary reason to jack up the price. And even though most swallowed it hook, line and sinker, there's global warming from the bad boy CO2, when northern England had vineyards and produced wine in the middle ages, when the most important gas warming the atmosphere is water vapor (accounting for 90%), and the world is actually GREENER with the more CO2 there is, and greenhouse owners actually buy CO2 generators to improve plant nutrition. So yea, here's to the manufactured reality world we think we live in.

PS: and to those disagreeing with this post, either by the classic knee-jerk reflex of cognitive dissonance or after thoroughly researching a third of what it states, oh boy. Are you in dire alienation from your surroundings and fully deserving being taken for an ass, or what. A smart one, of course. Smack in the middle of the age of information and zero discernment.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...irst-global-oil-pact-since-2001-idUSKBN13Z0J8

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment...rst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...wed-rise-of-co2-in-the-atmosphere-study-finds


 
Last edited:
Combustion: exhaust fumes, sound, vibration which all translates into passion.
Electricity: silence...nothing...dead.

Combustion: fumes, sound, pollution, Nox, CO2, global warming: REAL DEAD for our sons and daughters... but hey!, we had fun with our ICE cars and that's the must important, right?:thumbsdown:
And by the way, the electric is more fun to drive no matter your romantic vision of petrol is, i just want all the Nm/lb-ft instantly on the asphalt and see you in my mirror with your fumes and stupit combustions and waiting for the perfect rpm to get the power and bla bla bla...
 
Combustion: fumes, sound, pollution, Nox, CO2, global warming: REAL DEAD for our sons and daughters... but hey!, we had fun with our ICE cars and that's the must important, right?:thumbsdown:
And by the way, the electric is more fun to drive no matter your romantic vision of petrol is, i just want all the Nm/lb-ft instantly on the asphalt and see you in my mirror with your fumes and stupit combustions and waiting for the perfect rpm to get the power and bla bla bla...
Ah...there we go. I was waiting for you mr. greenzone. You dont own a car, you never fly, you do not use any plastics. You do anything in your zone of influence to keep the world a better place for your kids right?
And while you are at it looking into your soul please acknowledge the opinion of other. Cheers. (Dont watch F1 upcoming weekend...its polluting)
 
Ah...there we go. I was waiting for you mr. greenzone. You dont own a car, you never fly, you do not use any plastics. You do anything in your zone of influence to keep the world a better place for your kids right?
And while you are at it looking into your soul please acknowledge the opinion of other. Cheers. (Dont watch F1 upcoming weekend...its polluting)

Here are we talking about electric cars, not being the must responsable person in the world. Of course I do things that polluts, (using a computer is polluting), I live in this world and if I can do a little to improve the quality of the air I'll do, but I told you is not JUST for the environment, I really think that an electric vehicle is better in so many ways to the ICE cars.
Mod Edit: removed over the top and abusive post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest News

Are you buying car setups?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top