Cars RSS GT1 Championship

[007licensed]

EdOg's DBR9 for rfactor was my all time fav car for that game...
Unfortunatelly the available assetto DBR9 mods are very

 

[CC]

EdOg's DBR9 for rfactor was my all time fav car for that game...
Unfortunatelly the available assetto DBR9's mods are very

Be cool to make it with some hidden animations 007 style sign me up I love those cars

 

[AccAkut]

don't know if more GT1s would be the right direction... imo you guys should rather partner up with Kunos and make the Australian VASC committee an offer it can't refuse... V8 Supercar game based on whatever the ACC engine will turn out to be, day-night, weather, your attention to detail... no, don't wake me up, let a man dream...

 

[CC]

don't know if more GT1s would be the right direction... imo you guys should rather partner up with Kunos and make the Australian VASC committee an offer it can't refuse... V8 Supercar game based on whatever the ACC engine will turn out to be, day-night, weather, your attention to detail... no, don't wake me up, let a man dream...

I love graphics me more than anything when going into a sim environment, 1st 3D / 2nd ingame,
looking at ACC its where I belong the graphics are mind blowing, one day we will all be there bathing in sim godliness

 

[chrisi2174]

WIP

and i am working on improvements on my other Saleen skins

 

[chrisi2174]

Download Saleen SkinPack here
SWR Konrad Saleen + improvements on my other Saleen skins

 

[Vipla_Dare]

You're doing God's work Chrisi . I just wonder did you plan to do some Team Oreca skins too for the Shadow?

 

[CC]

Just a small update not really interesting to most,
in the end maybe it has taken twice as long to make these final 57 LOD,

in total there is 6 LOD, and has I suspected on ultra maxed out settings, every single setting set to the right,
maxed maxed maxed out ultra with a 1070sc and 64gb memory,
average against the kunos benchmark 15 cars and starting last is something like,

ULTRA
kunos average 77/ min 5 / max 128 cpu 76%
rss 57 average 82 min 20 / max 165 cpu 60%

HIGH
kunos average 120/ min 15 / max 163 cpu 91%
rss 57 average 135/ min 13 / max 190 cpu 90%

going lower and lower even down to minimum settings zero pp and stock everything,
kunos 201, rss 57 242 fps,

just keeps getting stronger and stronger the lower you go the performance stats are insane, the only thing I find confusing is 50+ tests ULTRA I am getting 60-61% cpu, but soon has I go down to HIGH, it jumps from 60-90cpu% this seems odd but same on both kunos and rss a massive cpu jump but insane fps and drawcalls saving,

ingame with this 57 I am saving over 25% drawcalls and all my benchmarks setting off on the 1st second are the same as kunos benchmarks at the end of the runs, its staggering either way what we have achieved here.
on average with 100,s of test maybe 200 tests on multiple content, I am seeing a 20-25% in drawcalls and cpu and fps everywhere its insane the benefits of these new techniques.

 

[Andreas Knöpke]

So are we there yet?

 

[CC]

So are we there yet?

Almost, just polishing these LOD still at the start Kunos FPS was 128 I was getting 125 and now 165/68 on ultra maxed roughly I wanted 170 at the start was a dream so just going around the LOD some more trying to find 2fps

 

[CC]

wow let me test this some more I think I worked out why the CPU is higher,
I am sure when you make the reflections static and not ultra it uses like almost 30% more CPU so strange
let me bench it another 20 times you would imagine it would be higher.

 

[Andreas Knöpke]

*sigh*

 

[CC]

I mean I have done maybe 250-300 benchmarks easily and noticed a massive difference using high settings to ultra settings, ULTRA as less CPU hit, looking here turning reflections to ULTRA you gain roughly 30% on CPU so racing online and stuff would be better to max out reflections, but I will test more.

anyways here is running ultra maxed out everything except reflections static, I mean look at the difference even the variation is a massive improvement.

this test is a massive difference with reflections turned on you get less fps but better cpu so odd
watch this difference give me ten minutes

 

[CC]

look at the difference here its insane static or ultra and massive cpu difference, imagine running online in races this make a big difference I feel.
either way ingame I see bigger differences than these benchmarks and this is ultra no one runs ultra maxed out racing online maybe 1% with a 1080.

and again the difference.

 

[Andreas Knöpke]

Glad u r having fun.
We just wanna drive tho

 

[After_Midnight]

wow let me test this some more I think I worked out why the CPU is higher,
I am sure when you make the reflections static and not ultra it uses like almost 30% more CPU so strange
let me bench it another 20 times you would imagine it would be higher.

I tried it with my sytem too (standart benchmark of AC):
-I5 4670k
-GTX 1070
-16 GB RAM

medium Reflection Quality, very low RRF
FPS: AVG 201 CPU: 90%

high Reflection Quality, ultra RRF
FPS: AVG 151 CPU: 82%

Greets After_Midnight

 

[CC]

I tried it with my sytem too (standart benchmark of AC):
-I5 4670k
-GTX 1070
-16 GB RAM

medium Reflection Quality, very low RRF
FPS: AVG 201 CPU: 90%

high Reflection Quality, ultra RRF
FPS: AVG 151 CPU: 82%

Greets After_Midnight

I find this really interesting indeed on my PC I am seeing roughly a 25-30% CPU gains, from static to ultra cpu,
I would have imagined it would be the opposite, either way our RSS pipeline will have settings to run the pack, with audio and graphics, but really interesting running ultra gives better cpu online that is a massive gain

 

[CC]

I tried it with my sytem too (standart benchmark of AC):
-I5 4670k
-GTX 1070
-16 GB RAM

medium Reflection Quality, very low RRF
FPS: AVG 201 CPU: 90%

high Reflection Quality, ultra RRF
FPS: AVG 151 CPU: 82%

Greets After_Midnight

I was just saying to the wife also I mean yes there is FPS differences but the gains in the CPU are insane,
and my screens I have 2x asus screens 1 on my laptop and a single monitor and both are 120fps,
and all these tests I shown above are running GSync also which is crazy,
yes the fps has differences but if your screens are not running past 120hz who cares from 201 to 151 fps visually there is no difference because the screen support is not there,
but the gains from the cpu make all the difference here I recommend everyone run ultra frequencies.

 

[LilSki]

It's likely because you are simply shifting the bottleneck from cpu to gpu. The cpu is waiting on the gpu at higher settings and thus lower cpu usage.

 

[CC]

It's likely because you are simply shifting the bottleneck from cpu to gpu. The cpu is waiting on the gpu at higher settings and thus lower cpu usage.

After_midnight sees a 10% difference, test it what do you see and show screens ?