The problem is not building the new HTML interface, but making it possible for the new UI to work with the legacy code.Studio 397 should just hire on the guys who make content manager to produce a conversion of the software for RF2. CM is the best UI of any past/current sim title in my opinion.
In German we say "Der Ton macht die Musik" ("The Tone makes the Music"). Should mean that not the critic should be the problem, but the way it is declaimed. Some people think that the anonymity of the internet gives them the right to behave like Assholes. Critic should be constructiv. If you have a critic, say it in the right way and say how you would make it better.I don't view constructive criticism as "hate", so the lecture as uncalled for...I'm talking about the "haters"
A simple but important distinction.
Probably that is bigger challenge because building HTML UI of rf2 scope (or any racing sim for that matter) is not something that should take years.The problem is not building the new HTML interface, but making it possible for the new UI to work with the legacy code.
If you have the time to looks at trees and vegetation, you're driving, not racing. Push it to the point where your brain no longer picks up anything but 2 thin white lines on the edge of a thick black line.The track looks great, but Studio397, please,improve these trees and vegetation. Even Lemans where the track is a high quality standard the trees look flat and with a wrong lighting. Studio397 should really address this issue in all the tracks.
Than why are there trees at all?If you have the time to looks at trees and vegetation, you're driving, not racing. Push it to the point where your brain no longer picks up anything but 2 thin white lines on the edge of a thick black line.
The other way around, it's a racing sim and not a driving sim.Than why are there trees at all?
Are you suggesting this is a driving simulator and not racing sim?
It's not really defending, it's more like I understand that some corners have to be cut.Some guys here are really defending (graphics) quality issues of a paid DLC with "put your brain into a state, where you didn't notice it anymore"?
True - happened once. False - happened on different occasion, because second time was different. I was just way too happy about car handling of AC 0.1, not as much as for AC 0.2. That led to unnecessary friction with fan(boy)s, and failed attempts to get discussions about realism happening. At the end I agree with the ban, it was right thing to happen, but I didn't ask for it that time, and basically it was rude. But I am ok with it because apparently no productive civil discussion could have happened anyway, I should have simply stopped trying and actually asked to ban me that time again to have no possibility coming there again, but it did happen naturally, so whatever.perhaps you meant to say the easy way was to send PMs to all the mods begging to be banned for "one year or 6 months".. which is what they did
one day I'll write a book about some of you guys... really.
It is not about 2D or 3D, it is about colour palette and lighting and you can't fail to see it, when driving in rF2 at noon. Setting the time at 7 pm, and it is pretty fine, for some reason.I'd love 3D trees with each individual leaf movement being calculated with the wind as much as the next guy or better rain, better lighting. Hell, I want bees flying abound with their small buckets, collecting honey, I want god rays so sharp I can see in to the future and on top of that I want laser scanned physics and a wizards hat.
bha... checking your messages I don't see anything at all that could have resulted in a ban, just ordinary stuff and discussions, but I definitely remember your super weird multiple PMs begging for a banTrue - happened once. False - happened on different occasion, because second time was different. I was just way too happy about car handling of AC 0.1, not as much as for AC 0.2.