Reasonably Priced Car: Voting

I'm almost there, but I've delayed the voting too long. Looks like I'll have to release my car AFTER the Competition.


Competitors

Star-T Beach

http://www.racedepartment.com/racer-cars/34100-star-t-beach.html

Repus Xplora (RPE not included)
http://www.racedepartment.com/racer-cars/34048-my-entry-for-budget-car-comp-xplora.html

Rauss Iota-B
http://www.racedepartment.com/racer-cars/34078-budget-concept-car-rauss-iota-b.html

BPM Cascada L (other Cascada variants are not included)

http://www.racedepartment.com/racer-cars/34066-bpm-cascada-l-1-4-16v.html
 
I voted for the Star-T Beach because it's the most complete car of the group in my opinion. It looks like it manages to be inexpensive yet carrying personalization features still. It's too light by the competition rules, though.

The Repus Xplora is fine by the rules, but appears unfinished and apart from it's size, doesn't feel like a budget vehicle to me.

The Rauss Iota-B is over the weight and power limit, though it fits the bill of a modern budget compact car.

The BPM Cascada L is the most utilitarian budget vehicle in the group and has a large feature set, though it's too heavy for the competition limit.
 
Star-T - Arguably, it's the best looking model. Looks distinct, yet realistic and fun. Physics (until he reworked them) seemed a bit stale and boring.

Xplora - It's good quality, but it feels like "another Repus vehicle". It drives and feels like a tall Velox.

Cascada L - Model isn't the prettiest, but the physics are very realistic and it's entertaining (in a realistic way)

Iota B - Was shaping up to be good, but needed more time to be finished.
 
Ironically I thought the Star-T seemed to be incomplete to me. Especially considering the interior was from a Pug and the gauges were modified and from the 350z (iirc?)

I vote cascada. I like the design the most and I feel it is the most realistic.
 
I voted for the Cascada because it covers all the aspects a reasonably priced car should cover, looks good and is great value for money.

Still the Star-T looks better but it's not reasonably priced. It is cheap because it is small.
 
I wouldn't buy one, but I voted for the Cascada.

The Star-T is beautifully made, but in "IRL" terms it's musch more of a fashion accessory, whereas the Cascada is a practical, sensible transport solution for a low budget, which is what the competition was about.
 
Since we are doing this.. I voted for the Xplora, for several reasons,
the main one being that of all the cars, this is the only one that made
an impression and that I have any memory of driving.

It was was nice to drive, looks funny and is different. Of course it still
needs some work, but my overall impression was that this is a fun car!

Just my 2c.
 
This is a shock. Didn`t expect to win but only three votes after all the work i genuinely put into it. What a waste of my time which I could have spent doing something else.

P.S. Cascada deseved to win btw.
 
all the cars are ****e. make an opel corsa b/vauxhall corsa b gsi or 16 sport.

397236_main.jpg
 
It has to be realistic... you know... realistic materials, engine etc.. so that IF it were real, it would be classed as 'reasonably priced'. Get it?

@AMGfan, nice lol xD
 

Latest News

Online or Offline racing?

  • 100% online racing

    Votes: 87 7.4%
  • 75% online 25% offline

    Votes: 123 10.5%
  • 50% online 50% offline

    Votes: 170 14.5%
  • 25% online 75% offline

    Votes: 326 27.9%
  • 100% offline racing

    Votes: 459 39.3%
  • Something else, explain in comment

    Votes: 4 0.3%
Back
Top