So people are penalized for the outcome of incidents? That's so wrong. Morgan got the penalty because Jack was there, and if Jack wasn't there, he'd just correct the car and continue...? I understand the 1.0 pp when you crash someone out as when someone does mistake in the way of braking at 50m instead of 100m where the braking point is, and therefore hitting someone and taking him out. But you just can't penalize someone because the rFactor damage model, which is unpredictable, decides to end the race for both drivers.
Btw, it is legal, but it's really...I'll say -sad- and to look at someone's race and write an appeal for his every mistake. I mean, things like the appeals about Morgan's Monza race corner cutting - when I was reading the appeal in the post race checks I couldn't believe what I'm reading. How desperate someone has to be to watch whole race of an opponent and write down every single corner cut? I think this is inapropriate thing to do, although it may be perfectly legal.
Also, about all the rules - when there's a rule writing about every single possible thing that can happen, you know the community is at very low moral stage. There's a thing called wisdom, which seems to be missing in the world, also in FSR. I'm not accusing anyone, but I'm just urging everyone to think about that. When you have wisdom, you don't need 20 page rules. Because you know on track when enough is enough, and when an incident happens you know that someone did a mistake, so you let him now and you forgive him. Yes, forgive. But it demands everyone to have wisdom. Perfect community. Oh, that doesn't exist. Still, think about that.
