Upcoming Events

Weekly BMW races on Simracing.GP Other regular AC events on Simracing.GP Weekly GT3 Sprint Races on Simracing.GP Rookie friendly WTCR sereis Weekly rFactor 2 events

PC3 Project CARS 3 | Developer Blog: Design And Physics

Paul Jeffrey

RaceDepartment Editor-in-Chief
Slightly Mad Studios have released a new 'developer blog' about their upcoming Project CARS 3 title, where they share some insight into the design and physics decisions employed within the game.

Yup, pitstops are a thing of the past in Project CARS 3. As is fuel consumption, with the studio taking a decision to focus less on strategy and more on the driver and car upgrades... which I'm sure will cause quite a bit of discussion within the community.

Slightly Mad Studios appear to have taken a direction change with their new game, putting a greater emphasis on the driving aspect of racing, and car customisation side of the gameplay. Similar to the tactic taken by such games as Gran Turismo, whilst still promising to retain an underlying sim racing experience for those who want to disable the more arcade gameplay features, this departure from previous instalments in the series is an interesting one, but perhaps inevitable considering the cool reception from sim racing fans Project CARS 1 and 2 have received in recent years.

You can read the blog post in full below:

Project CARS has always been about racing with your heart in your mouth as you push your limits in legendary race cars on epic tracks around the world—that unparalleled connection between driver, car, and surface that comes from our passion and the know-how we’ve acquired through the years, all of it validated by pro’ drivers. Project CARS is the driver at speed—that moment when you’re right on the edge and you’re loving every moment of the experience. For Project CARS 3, we’ve really doubled-down our focus on the driver. Yes, we’ve added assists and graphic effects to bring in a new audience to sim racing, but these assists and settings are purely optional—turn them on, or turn them off, the choice is completely up to you and what you want from the game. Project CARS 3 remains, at its core, a Project CARS experience, and with the same philosophy that has always been central to the franchise—to give you the Ultimate Driver Journey.

Kris Pope: Lead Designer: Yes, Project CARS 3, from a game design viewpoint, is focused far more on the driver than the previous two games. With this new instalment, the direction was to laser-in on what makes motorsport evoke so much passion in those of us who love the sport. The cars, the driving, the racing, the speed—we’re really narrowed down on those things with Project CARS 3.

David Kirk: Principal Physics Programmer: Project CARS 3 is both new and traditional, if I can call it that—the details, handling, the motorsport and the freedom of choice, the weather and so on, that’s what our long term fans want and that’s all there—though we’ve gone in and improved on all of that. New this time around is customisation for cars and drivers, and of course upgrades which is really an exciting addition. We’ve also added a whole layer to the game that introduces weekend warrior racing on road circuits and other options designed to get a new audience into sim racing in a way that doesn’t overwhelm them.

Kris Pope: Lead Designer: As in the real-world, drivers drive, and mechanics and the team worry about the minute details, and that’s what we wanted to aim for with Project CARS 3. In the end, it doesn’t matter what series it is—an amateur weekend or track-day or the top echelon of motorsport where 300 engineers with science degrees are pouring over reams of data—drivers are there to drive. And that’s really what we wanted to highlight with this new game. We wanted to bring a renewed focus on the driver and the racing. So now you don’t need to spend hours in a practice session working out the tyre life of a set of tyres for one car in one condition, and you don’t need to do the maths on how many litres of fuel you need to finish the race, and you won’t be punished for picking the wrong strategy and so on.

PCARS 3 1.jpg

Jussi Karjalainen: Handling QA Lead: All the good, dynamic tyre heating maths is still going in, and in many cases improved, just without the potential to overheat in the long term. All the dynamic situation-to-situation stuff is still there—but now, if you want to go sliding around for an entire race, you can. You’ll also be slower, though, but that’s another story!

Casey Ringley: Vehicle Technical Art and Handling: That’s actually a good example—the thermal model in layers above that does still happen as it did in Project CARS 2. The core tread temperature is locked, but the rubber contacting the road is still fully modelled for all heat effects.

Jussi Karjalainen: Handling QA Lead: To make it a little easier to understand—tyres aren’t part of “what suits the weather situation” problem anymore, they’re now “how much performance do we want”. Within most real-world racing series, hard and soft tyres are meant to be alternatives to each other, depending on the temperature, track type and strategy. But from one racing series to another, there exist differences in outright performance. A cheaper slick used in a regional series is usually worse than what a national GT3 series would use, GTE/prototype slicks can be two seconds a lap faster than GT3 tyres, and the rubber compounds used for Formula 1 are even faster than that. The core temperature of the tyre is locked to the “optimum” value (what you’d want to heat the tyres up to in Project CARS 2), but all of the layers from there towards the outside are still fully dynamic.

Casey Ringley: Vehicle Technical Art and Handling: The tyres being locked at ideal temperature and constant pressure means the tyre pressure setup is simpler as well. So, comparing to Project CARS 2, the only difference is that we reset the core tread temperature to an ideal setpoint at the start of each physics tick. And we do this to avoid penalising drivers who don’t have endless hours to assess their tyre wear before races. In the real world, teams come to race weekends already armed with all that data.

Jussi Karjalainen: Handling QA Lead: So rather than wear, it’s really the tyre heating where most of the magic happens, handling dynamics wise.

Casey Ringley: Vehicle Technical Art and Handling: The tyre discussion is actually a good reference point to how Project CARS 3 differs. I guess it’s geek-mode on time?!

PCARS 3 2.jpg

Jussi Karjalainen: Handling QA Lead: Here we go!

Casey Ringley: Vehicle Technical Art and Handling: Basically, while you have no actual wear in Project CARS 3, you’ve got multiple layers related to the heat model. Flash, Layer, Tread, and so on. Flash is the elements which touch and grip the track surface, Layer is an intermediate layer for diffusing heat energy, and Tread is the core bulk of tread rubber. All the heating dynamics in Flash and Layer still happen, we just lock temperature from Tread down through the rest of the model. I suppose a simpler way to put it is that the rubber layers influence tyre grip naturally at these time levels:

Flash Layer – What are you doing this instant?
Surface Layer – What were you doing in the last 5s?
Bulk Tread – What were you doing in the last 5m?

The biggest benefit comes from those three rubber layers of varying thickness and how they separate transient behaviour of the rubber from longer term heat effects.

The first, Flash layer, models the individual Setae contact points and is only 30 microns thick. This is where we do all the work-energy heating and you see huge temperature swings here—the heating of Flash layer is a primary tool for shaping our slip curves. We then have a surface layer between 0.5-1.0mm thick for the heat to diffuse though; this reacts more slowly but still pretty quickly.

If you really abuse your front tyres in a corner, this surface layer will be overheated by corner exit and results in Flash Setae entering the patch hotter than ideal. It recovers quickly for the next corner, so long as the bulk tread temps below it are in the ideal zone. What we’ve done in PC3 is lock that bulk tread to stay in the ideal zone so short-term transient behaviour is retained while minimizing long-term effects. Early in our “Seta Tyre Model” development, we only had Flash and Bulk Tread layers. Adding that middle one for the 0.5mm surface layer was a big improvement in handling feel, particularly how the car progresses through a corner. There is just something that makes for a clean, natural feel when the surface layer is slightly cooled at corner entry, heats up to optimal at apex, and is flirting with over-heatedness at corner exit.

Jussi Karjalainen: Handling QA Lead: Of course you still have access to your setups, though—aero, brake tuning, weight distribution, ride heights, alignment, springs, dampers, gearing and differential as well as tyre pressures are all there—but we’ve made the options a little easier to engage with and digest. We know that in Project CARS 2 the differentials were extremely complicated. There were 4 different kinds of differential (plus a spool that doesn’t allow for any differentiation), with at least 7-8 settings, and then all of that potentially for rear, centre, and front diffs separately, depending on how the car was set up. For Project CARS 3, we thought about what a driver would ask of their engineer: Preload, accel’ lock, decel’ lock, and done. The complex differential modelling is still there in the background, but the player has an easier time dealing with it through the new interface. Again, this goes to the driver-centric part of the design—less analysis paralysis, more straightforward tuning changes and racing.

Kris Pope: Lead Designer: So yes, if you want to get out on-track on a cold morning at Spa and just go drive and tinker with your setup, that’s obviously still there. And actually, if you do, you’ll notice that the driving physics have been improved (we’ve really nailed the over the limit feel). The key to this is the driver journey—the upgrades, the racing, the feel of the cars from the driver’s seat. Making the driving fun and the visceral enjoyment of driving a car at speed that sort of echoes that emotional connection we all get from motorsport.

Nick Pope: Principal Vehicle Handling Designer: So, for example, by removing tyre wear and fuel usage, we could in turn remove pitstops, which resulted in much closer and more consistent racing. Thus, the whole process of getting to the part that matters most—the actual racing and driving of these amazing cars and their upgrades—became a far easier and more streamlined affair. All these game design decisions have had great results in terms of the racing— with the tyres at their optimal range all the time and fuel at optimal load, there is no break in the action to stop for more fuel or new rubber. It’s pure racing action, and it’s just made Project CARS 3 into a much better racing-driver experience.

David Kirk: Principal Physics Programmer: Though none of that means we’ve simplified the tyre model. It’s just all happening under the hood. Overall, this change has kept the focus on the racing and less on engineering tactics. It makes the racing fairer—it’s about what you do behind the wheel that counts—and as a driver it makes the experience a lot closer to what you’d get in the real world.

Doug Arnao: Physics and AI director: The AI has also responded well to this new direction and it makes them a lot more predictable and really human-like. And obviously there’s no rubber-banding.

David Kirk: Principal Physics Programmer: As Casey said, the core of the simulation is still the core of the game, but we’ve really made Project CARS 3 about the driver. In the end, racing and driving is actually meant to be a fun and rewarding experience, and being competitive in a race should be more about your skills and the upgrades and so on, and less about whether you can afford to sit and spend countless hours deep-tuning every layer of your setup. The moment-to-moment experience of the franchise remains as it always was, we’ve just really focused-in on what makes a driving game—and what makes driving—such an emotional and cool experience.

Original Source; Slightly Mad Studios.

Project CARS 3 is set to release on Xbox One, PS4 and PC August 28th 2020.

Want to discuss this new game with fellow sim racing fans? No worries, head over to the Project CARS 3 sub forum here at RaceDepartment and start up a new thread!

PCARS 3 Footer.jpg
Last edited:
@turbo86 It is hard to agree or disagree when you stereotyping how the cars are in games/sims. In my opinion they are too easy and too hard. It depends...

I don't think you are very good driver, or you are describing iRacing. Using vision, anticipating what car will do, listening to engine and tires and listening to FFB feel are all enough to balance most of the cars in games and simulations. But it is very broad subject, and you just can't say that everything is absolute same, unless everything is beyond your capabilities, then it perhaps seems so. Just practice a little bit.

It is true that real life has more sensations, but they aren't making that much difference as it has become custom to think by many. Physics should never be compromised.

My point for tires was just approach to describe what is driving on and over the limit. And I didn't say it, but I say it now. I think it is easier in simulations and games more often than it is harder. So I didn't proove your point. One thing that I agreed with you was that in many cases there probably is lack of grip, but then there is likely too much of grip beyond the limit.. There is one very little, and super simple thing to know - tire works for static friction when at contact it is stationary, and it also works for kinetic friction - when at contact it is slipping, and almost everything in a performance car evolves from that.
It's a no-brainer for the dev team really: focus on improving the stuff they've been able to do in the past and remove the problematic stuff that they still can't nail.

No idea why they're calling it Project CARS 3 though. It's 100% a NFS Shift game. No wonder everybody's confused.
Maybe because the Shift IP is owned by EA? ;)
I think I'd probably agree that there are more "sandbox" sims than needed, and I'd love to see developers create more series specific titles. ACC is obviously the best current example of such an approach, and I hope it's selling well enough to encourage other devs to follow suit.

Personally, I'd probably kill for some historic series as well. Although I'm not sure how the licensing process would work (assuming it's even possible), mid 90s BPR would be awesome, as would an early 70s - mid 80s Trans-Am and/or IMSA series.

Regardless, whether single player career mode or online multiplayer fans, I think sim racers prefer more than one or two cars from a series, and I wonder whether that even explains the poor participation seen in iRacing's historic road content.

Well, it is the same issue in raceroom. I did not buy the lone GTE or the single class Dtm. Get some competitors then I’ll get them.

That’s the reason why I love games like Pcars or AC with their wider selection of cars. They are the only 2 games you can drive a road car that is calibrated better. Guess it’s only ancient AC and pcars 2left now. Sigh.

I guess the assist screen is not posted here. It’s even more infuriating to see that assist screen as it seemed like there could be no more authentic assists. Seriously, SMS pioneered the whole idea of authentic assists like a GT3 will have most electronics but a group 5 won’t. Now they are removing and heading back to the shitty old way that forza still doing.
The car physics are still simulation... Its not an arcade game because some features are missing...

ACC tire modell has way more realistic simulated features than the iRacing tire model... Is iRacing arcade because of that ? Cmon...

Thing is PC and SMS were heading in the right direction with the evolution and fluidity of racing...it's NOT a constant. A driver has to constantly adjust to the changing track grip, tyre wear and fuel. Real track was in the right direction. But AMS2 will do this and without the influence of Codemasters so all is not lost.
@turbo86 It is true that real life has more sensations, but they aren't making that much difference as it has become custom to think by many. Physics should never be compromised.
So real life feedback doesn't make any difference? Wow...OK maybe i AM a "bad" driver...maybe you're Lewis Hamilton...(you attitude definitely matches) but you just called every single PROFESSIONAL MOTORSPORTS CHAMPION a "bad driver" as well, because guess what, they all say the same thing i'm saying. VIDEO GAMES aren't even close to the real thing. Meaning...real life DOES MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE. DUH. Feeling like i'm talking to an absolute lunatic here....
So with that...i'll just ignore you. You don't know what the hell you're talking about and you're pure TOXIC. Cheers.
a little look in to the future ;)

"we want to give the players more fun, so we eliminated all corners, bumps and curbs on Nordschleife.
120% throttle and no brakes needed anymore" :thumbsup:

"we eliminated Nordschleife. The new track layout was too challenging for our community" :roflmao:

But we share with other sims an invaluable tool of simulation value that gives us the right to call our game a sim-racing product. Something that every sim one of them has:


Consider them mechanical failures in multiplayer races for interesting tactics. :) Best fans in the world!
Last edited:
Bye bye PC series, welcome Shift 3...
But what for, no idea.
Because there's a lot of people still waiting for a racing game that combines decent physics, car customization, progression, variety of cars and racing categories. The only game that offered this package was Shift and Shift 2.Shift 2 got a LOT of mods as well, including physics mods that made it more enjoyable.

Now, i'm kinda sad for not having tire wear and fuel consumption. This means that the races will be very short as well, but it's ok, it's better if it becomes more like GT or Forza. Besides, we have plenty of GOOD racing SIMULATORS to enjoy. And nobody liked PC2 anyway so no harm done.

Kimmo Kokkonen

Lord GTR3, His master's voice
a little look in to the future ;)

"we want to give the players more fun, so we eliminated all corners, bumps and curbs on Nordschleife.
120% throttle and no brakes needed anymore" :thumbsup:

"we eliminated Nordschleife. The new track layout was too challenging for our community" :roflmao:


Oh, you think Nordschleife is challenging track? Yes it is challenging with original Grand Prix Legends game but with Assetto Corsa or any other modern simulator it is way too easy and boring to drive, one of the most easiest track in the world!

This is my live recorded safely driven on Assetto Corsa lap with 'basic' setup, I can do a little bit faster without recording.

Nordschleife 5.17 min lap

My record with GPL Lotus was 8.30 something (old track was 2 km longer)...that car is challenging to drive fast.

They say that ACC is worst than AC..

So be sure that I'm going to buy PC3 immediately it's released.

See these videos, it looks and sounds so good, can't wait!

Project CARS 3 - Announce Trailer (4K)

Project Cars 3 | Carving out a New Niche?
Last edited: