Hi, thanks for the screenshots.
I took myself another two with the short qualifying (legend) & no fast-forward at all:
After analysing your results and my own results, I got the following conclusions:
1.- In short qualyfing sessions, AI cars often struggle to execute a perfect lap without traffic. Because of having 22 cars in all the session, it's difficult for them to make a perfect lap (compare my screenshots, focusing on Hamilton and Vettel, and also Sergio Pérez should be theoretically faster than his teammate, same with Carlos Sainz and with all 1st drivers, except Mercedes, they're equal at v3.1).
2.- Because Spielberg is a short track (low times), it isn't the best track to get info about performances, as results can be misleading (short track = low time differences between cars = more traffic on a qualy lap).
3.- Maybe I'm judging Max Verstappen (too slow) and Daniil Kvyat (too fast) wrong, because i'm using all their 2016 results, even when they were at Toro Rosso and Red Bull respectively. Now that there are more races-in the season, maybe it's time to only count their results since Spanish GP.
4.- I'm going to test this in other circuits before making a decision about making Red Bull faster or Williams slower. Mercedes is definetely where I want them to be (they have maxed numbers in the database, they're the best team, but not that dominant like in real life, so the game doesn't get boring).
5.- Also, to collect better data maybe it is better to simulate a Q1, Q2 or Q3 session instead of a short qualyfing, to avoid at maximum traffic problems.
Any info, screenshots, opinions or suggestions that you can give me will be appreciated.
