Yeah, I know, technically yes... question is whether it is any joyAccording to min. system requirements you should be able to run the game.
Do you think an intel Core 2 Duo @ 3GHz 2GB ram and an ATI HD5770 will work fine and look good at 1920x1200?
Your system is fairly similar to mine David and rF2 is running ok (but not exactly brilliantly) on my machine with minimum graphics settings. My impression so far is that even on minimum there's a significant hit on fps compared to rFactor 1, but it's early days and hopefully the ISI guys can make improve the performance a little as the game develops.As it's a laptop, it is not perfect. Will I ble able to run rF2 okayish?
Your system is fairly similar to mine David and rF2 is running ok (but not exactly brilliantly) on my machine with minimum graphics settings. My impression so far is that even on minimum there's a significant hit on fps compared to rFactor 1, but it's early days and hopefully the ISI guys can make improve the performance a little as the game develops.
By looking on my rig.
CPU: Intel Core# i7 Hexa Processor i7-970 Hexa Core, 3,2Ghz
GPU: Gainward GeForce GTX 580 3072MB PhysX
RAM: Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600MHz 12GB (ye, I know, DDR3... -.-)
(same OS, and a SSD)
And I'm barely making it alone on the track, I would have to say... No.
Yup, However, I do think (or at least hope) that it will be better optimized later onReally? WOW! That sucks
I would not consider that a low end PC, did you try everything maxed out, or did you also lower the settings?By looking on my rig.
CPU: Intel Core# i7 Hexa Processor i7-970 Hexa Core, 3,2Ghz
GPU: Gainward GeForce GTX 580 3072MB PhysX
RAM: Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600MHz 12GB (ye, I know, DDR3... -.-)
(same OS, and a SSD)
And I'm barely making it alone on the track, I would have to say... No.