FSR 2013 Mod beta Feedback

[William Levesque]

 

[John-Eric Saxén]

A higher percentage of throttle, which equals a higher brake map number in rFactor, will provide some rear stability under heavy braking, but will also tend to induce some corner entry understeer in slow corners. It also will have a small negative effect on fuel mileage.

A lower percentage of throttle, which equals a lower brake map number in rFactor, will help slow speed turn in, but can cause the rear wheels to lock up more suddenly if you are too aggressive on the brake pedal. It also will have a small positive effect on fuel mileage.

I'm very surprised if someone didn't know that lower number = more engine brake, as it has been the same in rFactor since day one.

 

[patrick de wit]

you guys misreading me
The number from 0 to 4 is **** we need a bigger way to play with it as just with the wings settings,,,thats all i ask nothing more but then again its precision again right people can say whatever on this stupid forum its always the same **** its a feedback forum and what stupid answer you get from a silly kid like kuncman thinking he is so smart and stuff get your act together frustraded vietnam veteran what happened to you in your childhood

 

[patrick de wit]

there is no oversteer just understeer and front locking but ok who am i
Its better to give no ****ing feedback at all right and just shut up

 

[Carlos Martín]

you guys misreading me
The number from 0 to 4 is **** we need a bigger way to play with it as just with the wings settings,,,thats all i ask nothing more but then again its precision again right people can say whatever on this stupid forum its always the same **** its a feedback forum and what stupid answer you get from a silly kid like kuncman thinking he is so smart and stuff get your act together frustraded vietnam veteran what happened to you in your childhood

Now you know how I felt some messages before.

 

[Carlos Martín]

there is no oversteer just understeer and front locking but ok who am i
Its better to give no ****ing feedback at all right and just shut up

Carlos Martín: "Ok better doing like raikkonen, just driving and no more."

 

[patrick de wit]

well its a stupid post of him does not making any sense just trying to get reactions like this

 

[David Dominguez]

you guys misreading me
The number from 0 to 4 is **** we need a bigger way to play with it as just with the wings settings,

Well, I'm sorry but I think everybody understood another thing, Pat. I think I'll add more engine braking steps, I kind of agree that it would be better to have some values more to play with.

 

[patrick de wit]

thank you david

 

[Gergo Baldi]

Pat gave just a feedback.. didn't do anything wrong, just wanted to help the developing of the mod..

 

[patrick de wit]

Actually I'm deadly serious about those tests. I have suggested them for 2 years now, at least unofficially. It is for 1 very simple reason, I'm not speaking about someone particular now but majority of FSR drivers don't know rules - fact. How many times someone sent wrong files or sent no files, how many times someone had wrong settings in game or in files, how many times people ask on server the most trivial stuff right before the race or quali, how many times people fail on the most basic of things, asking incredibly weak-minded stuff on the forums. I am not trying to offend anyone and again I am not speaking about anyone in particular, but the fact is that cpu power of certain individuals is lacking.
Now it is questionable whether it is due to lack of care, lack of intellect or lack of reading skills. That is what those tests would uncover and FSR could take certain steps towards educating their members.
Naturally such strategies would only cost FSR drivers, which I'm fully aware of which is why I never suggested it officially.

Now finally about your engine braking, you and almost everyone else on mod testing forum did literally nothing. Now 4 days before the mod is official it is a bit too late for making such changes isn't it. Furthermore it is not a mod issue, it is your setup issue or driving issue, but as far as I understand in your case it is easier to get the mod fixed rather than fixing the setup so that's that. Peace.

Edit: To reading comprehension I would also add communication and communicating your points across. Indeed a very useful skill to possess

send wrong files wrong settings have nothing to do with this
not gonna asnwer to you anymore

i gave feedback reason i did not test beta is that i have little time now
I asked this same thing on betaforum and nothing was done with it
And you give blah blah examples

communication??

Starting with you

 

[patrick de wit]

is it correct its around 4 ltr per lap?On Melbourne?
Track is 58 including form lap is 59 but 59 x 4 ltr is 236 ltr?

While we can only have 230 ltr?

Is this correct?

 

[jetplaner]

5L is 1.1 lap. I think is between 270-295L

 

[Dian Kostadinov]

Yes, would be better to decrease the fuel usage per a lap.. maybe with 10-15 or 20%.

 

[Ville Leppala]

How can u use 4l on one lap? I dont even...

 

[John-Eric Saxén]

No, those are too high numbers. A bit over 4 L per lap as De Wit said is what I get as well. The fuel tank size should be fixed in the next update to allow larger fuel quantities.

 

[Carlos Martín]

I use 3.95 liters per lap.

 

[patrick de wit]

i think we need to lessen the fuel per lap as cars are way to heavy on lets say 300 ltrs?

 

[intact]

3.77 litres per lap for me.

 

[Dian Kostadinov]

And you think this is real to start with fuel around 250 liters ? Why you don't make the cars with 10-15% less powerful, less hp, that will help us to be closer to real F1 like times and will decrease the fuel usage per lap...