First, If you think he had any control on that off-camber grass, you are very very much mistaken.
You lose control on that off-camber grass with walls close to you at 150kmh most certainly pressing the brakes will throw him into a spin or crash the walls.What you do - is exactly what Vettel did.
Since when have you ever driven a Formula 1 car under race condition and drove on the grass?
Cars with less downforce and grip have shown that you can control the car to a certain extent on dry grass.
Second thing, your own opinion is not a fact, but just an opinion and although I may respect it (nothing against that) it is completely wrong on many levels. First, you cannot play those options in split second like this is some nintendo game.
You are mistaken, it is a fact that he rejoined unsafely and impeded Hamilton (according to regulations, they all agreed on). For the rest of your incorrect thinking about opinions and facts, I will respond in the very last paragraph here.
F1 drivers have lightning reaction times (which they btw. practice a lot), see i.e. Raikonnen vs Hamilton on pit exit Suzuka 2012, you are incorrect again.
There is one fact though, Lewis Hamilton did not got a penalty of any sort for a relatively identical situation with Daniel Ricciardo in Monaco 2016, making this call on Vettel, completely ridiculous and very much serious thing for F1 community and the way F1 implements their rules.
Wrong, the situation was nowhere near the same. When Hamilton rejoined the track, the racing line was clear, nobody was coming (though somebody was behind, but they both overshot, he was not slower due to the rejoin). Hamilton had a worse acceleration out of the (overshot) corner, which allowed Ricciardo to go alongside - Hamilton left ENOUGH room (clearly visible watching the onboards), but Ricciardo started to lose car control due to the fact that he was on slicks and the area Hamilton left open was very wet, those are the facts.
You can also clearly see the distinct differences, Vettel didn't leave enough room and cut across a much faster approaching Hamilton. These are the facts, yours is a distorted fanboy view of the incident.
The ironic thing about the penalty is, he is penalized for dangerous rejoining: first I am not sure how do you rejoin safely when you are racing at full speed with driver behind your back. [I will not answer on the rest of your paragraph because too much bullshit and I won't waste time on it]
There is your problem, you NEVER should rejoin at full speed. But again, you are misinformed, Vettel never tried to rejoin at full speed. Additionally rejoining the track should not give you the right to stay ahead, safety should always comes first.
No need to answer on the rest of your bs, see my last paragraph here.
Lewis was clever to think that through and make that move to trigger the penalty. He is cunning, use what you can use. He says he will do just the same if he was in Vettel's position. Vettel on the other side loses control and rejoins safely enough without any accident or intentionally pushing anyone, and then he gets penalty and the race everyone wanted to see in this stupidly boring championship and waited to see for few months went away and here we are now talking about this bullshit for weeks, and we will in the future too, because no matter how you interpret the case, it will always come in favor of Vettel, because opposes everything that F1 and racing stands for.
Just wow, the amount of stupidity and misinformation of you is insane. Additional to that you can not distinguish between facts and opinions - you intentionally try to sell your opinion as facts and don't understand what facts are.
Professionals said it multiple times and I repeat it here, strict to the rule book it is a violation! And the stewards interpreted it that way aswell. "it will always come in favor of Vettel" - not in this world, rightfully so.
As we are a sim community, you exactly know that is a big no no to rejoin directly back on the racing line, when the track is not clear. If you have raced a lot, you probably have experienced several crashes due to bad rejoins like this.
P.s.
Hilarious. Anyway you said your interpretation I told you mine. No reason to go any further so, all the best to you!
PS. I wasn't arguing, I was merely stating the obvious (aka your delusions).
There is no point in arguing with dumb people like you.
