Here you have the ability to sign the petition, i´m not sure you will be anonymous on the petition but you will definitely be anonymous on this forum.
http://www2.ae911truth.org/signpetition.php
It is a petition for an independent investigation on the WTC skyscrapers.
Here´s a nice compilation of all the winesses reporting "molten steel" "like lava"
Random witnesses and firefighters.
Joe Allbaugh, the Director of FEMA, was interviewed by Bryant Gumbel of CBS news on October 10 2001:
GUMBEL: We’re seeing a lot of video of smoke pouring up from the debris.
ALLBAUGH: Correct.
GUMBEL: And we’re hearing there are places where temperatures are still approaching and sometimes exceeding a thousand degrees.
ALLBAUGH: That’s right.
GUMBEL: Why? Why do we have these hot spots? @@color(black):What’s going on@@?
ALLBAUGH: Well, you have normal debris, you know, computers, paper, you have some areas that are hot pockets because of fuel. It’s just too hot for rescuers to get into those areas. So we do not know yet what’s in those areas, other than very hot, @@molten material@@. FEMA.gov
Source publication date: CBS Early Show 10/04/01
Interviewer: Bryant Gumbel
Witness: Joe Allbaugh
Date molten metal was observed: up to 10/04/01
So from 11th September to 4th October there was places so hot that they could not access it.
Roughly
23 days after the buildings had collapsed there was still places that were flaming hot.
In the video above the firefighters are saying that there was still extremely hot places more then 6-7 weeks after the collapse. 6 weeks equals 42 days... How is that even possible when the only fuel in the buildings were fuel from the airplanes? If you could get a tank of airplane fuel to burn for 42 days we would not have any enviromental issues
-
One other theory that i first brushed away as the least plausible theory but as i had read through the whole thing i concluded that even though it contains exotic weapons, it still present quite a lot of evidence that supports the theory.
She is also as far as i know the only person that has had the balls to press charges against the government.
http://www.drjudywood.com/
If Direct Energy Weapons sounds outlandish, here´s a video for you from Iraq with an interview from one of the surgeons there where he speaks about in what shape the victims were in.
It´s very interesting and fuels the fire that USA might have tried Energy Weapons in Iraq.
there are more parts but you should just be able to click on. After having seen that it at the very least enhances the possibility that Direct Energy Weapons could have been used in 9/11.
It is one way to explain the energy needed to turn almost all concrete into a fine dust.
Something that as far as i know, a normal collapse would never have the energy to do.
-
Some more info, it´s a slideshow of steel columns from NIST. In some of these pictures it looks like the steel behaved in a similar manner like when you put a lighter on plastic, it becomes all soft and contracts itself to later turn solid again and have a very odd shape that looks more like it had been molded then bent of immense force.
This picture is not even taken from the two towers or WTC 7, this was a building that was hit by debris.
Notice the odd shape on the steel column. It literally looks like someone has put a blowtorch on it for days then slowly cramped it inwards creating this very odd shape. Especially when you consider the building had only been hit by debris.
Picture is from the Bankers Trust building. They decided to destroy the whole building instead of simply repairing it. A theory why you can read in the Dr Judy link i posted.
