The Lost Art of Using An H-Shifter

The Lost Art of Using An H-Shifter.jpg
Recreating the feel of a real race car is the core principle of sim racing, and the advancements in equipment reflect this with each new piece that is released: Better force feedback, racing-grade pedals – but as modern race cars usually do not have manual shifters anymore, lots of sim rigs do not either. As a result, driving with a fully manual transmission has become somewhat of a lost art.

Granted, the title is a bit overly-dramatic, but at least it holds true when looking at most modern sims and esports that tends to get focused on. These use modern cars that have paddle shifters on their wheels, the GT3 class being a prime example of this. Some do not even use a clutch for starts anymore, and while others do, analog clutch paddles do the job on the wheel as well. Two-pedal rig setups are no rarity because of this.

It is likely because of this that there are not too many dedicated shifters on the sim racing market. There are offerings by Fanatec, Thrustmaster, Logitech and a few smaller manufacturers, but the choice sim racers get is far from the enormous selection of pedal sets, for example. Still, for enthusiasts of motorsports history (like the author), H-shifters are an essential part of the experience in order to drive older vehicles the way they were meant to be driven.

While using paddles makes shifting gears easier and is absolutely impossible to imagine not doing in a modern F1 rocketship or a GT3, it does not compare to the feel of muscling around an older race car while using three pedals and a manual shifter. It is quite literally a handful, as well as a bit of a workout. Not to mention the coordination part – if you have never done it before, learning to use all three pedals is quite the process, especially on downshifts.

The upshifts are fairly straight-forward, as lifting your right foot off the throttle while pressing the clutch and selecting the next gear is relatively easy. However, using three pedals with just two feet is more challenging: Braking with your right foot (as opposed to the left foot normally used these days in modern race cars), waiting for the revs to drop enough, then pressing the clutch while using your heel to blip the throttle in order to rev-match and selecting a lower gear, sometimes even going down two at a time – it is easy to see why they prefer paddles instead of heel-toeing their way around the track.

Of course, eliminating the process described above makes downshifts considerably less complicated. But to get more immersed in a car that actually has this kind of transmission, nothing beats trying to learn this dance on the pedals. Modern sims offer plenty of vintage content, be it Assetto Corsa via mods, rFactor2 or Automobilista 2 – it is unlikely to form the base of an esports competition, but if you can find a one-off event or a league using cars with a fully manual transmission, it is worth a closer look. A word of warning, though: You might become hooked.

What is your opinion on shifters in sim racing? Have you bothered with learning how to use them for vintage cars? Let us know in the comments!
About author
Yannik Haustein
Lifelong motorsport enthusiast and sim racing aficionado, walking racing history encyclopedia.

Sim racing editor, streamer and one half of the SimRacing Buddies podcast (warning, German!).

Heel & Toe Gang 4 life :D

Comments

Premium
That comparison between an H paddle and vinyl record hurt until I thought about it a bit.

People have gotten back onto vinyl recently not because it sounds better, it doesn't. The resurgence is to feel more connected with the music. To touch and read the album cover and take the effort to handle the record and to make it an experience.

In that way they are similar. With a manual there is more of a viceral feeling that you are connected with the car in a more inimate way.

This is NOT a right or wrong thing.

This is about variety and enjoying driving all manner of racing car.
 
Been missing using an H-Shifter singe my Logi shifter started acting up (1st and 3rd sort of constantly "blip" between in-gear and neutral making it basically unusable, advice appreciated) but at least it's given me more of an appreciation for sequential driving too
 
Last edited:
Porsche 911 R
Mazda 787B
Porsche 911 Singer by Ben O'Bro
That Porsche 911 Singer is a blast to drive with my Fanatec SQ 1.5. It reminds me of the second car I ever owned. It was a 1983 Porsche 924. Thats the car that I learned to heal and toe in. I've missed that car every day since I sold it.
 
To me driving a manual trans is an overrated endeavor. When I was a kid, it was basically how I learned to drive. But as a person who has shifted manually on the column and floor, no one is going to tell me I am quicker yanking around manual gears as opposed to paddle shifters.

Some old things need to stay old, as should heel/toe. What a hack that is.
 
Once I have an H-pattern shifter, I'll be using it all the time :roflmao: since many cars I wanna drive in sims involve an H-pattern. That or a sequential stick. But I don't have the right setup for that right now. One day soon enough. :)

As an aside – I would love to see sims do a gearbox simulation that requires more 'mechanical sympathy', if you will, from the driver. Same as I'd love to see things like brake fade be simulate-able (in sims other than BeamNG). I've read several times on RD that current sims' transmission simulations (even AC or rF2 or AMS) are not very detailed and can allow techniques that would ruin the real-world car (even with assists off). But the other side of the story is that devs have made their choice for simpler transmission models because the sim racing hardware currently being sold doesn't have enough sophistication to allow for a more realistically-behaving transmission model to be well-exploited. So... yeah. I dunno.
 
Premium
I still think it's funny that people will debate which one actually better for a sim??

Think about that?

You are paying for a fun simulated experience. Shouldn't you get the experience what you want?

That runs the gamut from Karting to F1. Since a GTE car tends to perform better than a GT3, why would you ever drive a GT3 unless you want to drive with the characteristics of a particular car. And if that particular car has paddle shifters, a sequential shifter or an H pattern shifter shouldn't you use the same thing that was in the actual car if you want to accurately simulate it?

How can driving with one actually be better than another in a simulation. The whole point is to enjoy the driving experience.
 
Premium
Porsche 911 R
Mazda 787B
Porsche 911 Singer by Ben O'Bro
The Mazda is a treat with the stick shift.

I'd toss in the GT-40 too. Didn't love the car with paddle shifting but with stick you really feel the muscle.
 
I still think it's funny that people will debate which one actually better for a sim??

Think about that?

You are paying for a fun simulated experience. Shouldn't you get the experience what you want?

That runs the gamut from Karting to F1. Since a GTE car tends to perform better than a GT3, why would you ever drive a GT3 unless you want to drive with the characteristics of a particular car. And if that particular car has paddle shifters, a sequential shifter or an H pattern shifter shouldn't you use the same thing that was in the actual car if you want to accurately simulate it?

How can driving with one actually be better than another in a simulation. The whole point is to enjoy the driving experience.
I could not read all the comments, but sure, it's a pointless discussion.

Online, I usually drive modern cars and obviously, I will be using the paddles to be competitive.

(Sadly, even when driving the SV8 at iRacing, I always used paddles because... even the Aussie streamers I have seen do it and there is no way I could compete otherwise. I can barely compete with them in this car with the paddles TBH...)

Offline, if driving a modern car, paddles.

If driving a historical car, H-shifter, manual clutch, heel and toe. I don't think about whether it is better or worse, it is just a different experience I sometimes miss if I keep driving only modern cars.

If in ETS I usually just don't need the heel and toe :D

And now I remember that even online, in a Brazilian league, a couple of times I drove the VW-Gol in AMS 1 using the h-shifter and had tons of fun.

I enjoy all that stuff.
 
Last edited:
If the object was to make those of us who have an H-pattern shifter feel like an antique...

Mission accomplished!

Asking whether a person has taken the time to learn how to shift an H pattern shifter in a sim jumps over the idea that many of us have learned to drive sticks on real cars.

Then taking two paragraphs to describe what is involved in using an H pattern shifter....

Oh WOW! Well a car is considered an antique once it is older than 45, so I guess it fits.

And yeah, I bit the bullet on this one. Being an antique has some advantages I guess. I'm still waiting for the hydraulic lockout attachment for it, if they ever get that first production run out.

I love rowing gears in Group B Rally cars.
View attachment 558016
 
Assetto Corsa with the 50's Le Mans cars (C-Type, D-Type, DBR, Testa Rossa) and the classic Le Mans track make the stick a must no matter what grade the equipment. Just adds to the enjoyment and achievement. With powertrain damage on realistic levels, it is rewarding to keep the powertrain intact for a long run. Nothing like being many laps in on a 10, 20 or more lap session and have a bad shift or over rev kill your race. Have to learn to be nice to the car... but fast.
 
In my more old-mannish moments I tend to think real race cars have H-pattern shifters, don't have wings, and don't look like rolling billboards. As far as sims go, I always want to use whatever shift method that the real car would use. If I'm pretending to be up against Jim Clark, I'm going to use an H-shifter, if I'm pretending to race Schumacher it's going to be paddles. Wouldn't dream of using and H shifter on a Ferrari F2004 or a paddle in a GT40.

A smoothly executed heel-and-toe downshift is very satisfying. And it sounds good.

In real life I drive an automatic, which is demonstrably better in terms of efficiency than a stick and modern automatics are way ahead of those of a couple of decades ago, but I do sometimes miss the pleasures of clutch and stick, even in snow.
 
IRL and in sims, the cars that are truly awesome and engaging are the ones that make you shift the gears manually via a stick shift. I own a 2018 BMW M6 (7 speed sequential) and a 1986 Porsche 944 (5 speed stick).

The 944 is more involving and fun despite only being a 150hp car (vs the 600hp M6). At lot of that is due to the gear shift. It demands your attention. It won't drive itself.

Also, it's way easier to drift with a stick (and a clutch). I like how I'm in complete control of the car at all times. With a sequential , it's a more indirect experience, a little numb in comparison.
 
That Porsche 911 Singer is a blast to drive with my Fanatec SQ 1.5. It reminds me of the second car I ever owned. It was a 1983 Porsche 924. Thats the car that I learned to heal and toe in. I've missed that car every day since I sold it.

I had a 944 Turbo as my 3rd car. I remember with posi rear end and wide rear tires you'd be hard pressed to get that thing to burn out in the dirt. You wind it up to like 6k dump the clutch and it would just grip & go!

I blew it up racing my buddies Vette down the freeway. :( That's when I learned why 17 year olds don't own Porsches. It's not that you can't get the car, it's that after getting the car and something goes wrong you are truly screwed.
 

Latest News

Article information

Author
Yannik Haustein
Article read time
3 min read
Views
34,943
Comments
174
Last update

Are you buying car setups?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top