Resource icon

(DATA REPLACEMENT) BMW M3 E30 Improved Physics by Arch 1.7

No permission to download
I prefer the kunos versions at this moment
Certainly not an improvement over the stock KS M3. Only 2 stars because we have already have an excellent E30 M3 from KS. I really think you should put the books down occasionally and get out there and drive a real car, to help you refine what they actually feel like to drive. You will never learn that from a book. I drove a Schnitzer-modified E21 323i in competition from 1984-1986 in SCCA D production, and have driven US-spec street E30 M3's on several occasions afterward. These cars were beloved for their adjustability with the throttle, but your version (I tested only the street car with 90's tires) has eliminated much of that essential, defining characteristic from the car. Instead, it is only slightly reactive to sudden throttle changes, which is *quite* wrong. These cars still had the old semi-trailing arm rear end and were quite a handful on the limit (though the M3 was masterfully tuned). As a result, the cars IRL would often require maintenance throttle to keep them from over-rotating mid-corner. The KS version reflects this. Yours does not. I don't really care if all the angles and arm lengths etc are "correct". The end result doesn't match the real car. Why not get a real driver to help you with your correlation problems? You have them, regardless of what your books tell you.
I've got a lot of E30 and M3 driver feedback. All of it is contradictory with each other. Half of them say it should oversteer more, half of them say it should understeer more. I have some ideas myself though; I don't think it's in the rear necessarily. As they say, if there is a problem in the rear; look in the front.

If you want to help me, you can record some footage and send it to me via PM and describe in detail what you think the discrepancy is. I could get a better idea for the underlying issue; if there is one. Sta-bar mount flex is certainly a possibility.
Hi, I don't know what you did to this car the feeling is very bad, the one of kunos is a reference in simulation...
You killed a myth!
First of all I want to say that I have a direct drive so the level felt is not better at the moment.
I also own a BMW (not a DTM of course) so I know how these cars behave.

With your data I no longer have any feeling in my steering wheel, I no longer feel the oversteer or understeer and the car really stalls for nothing. It's confusing because I feel like I have a Logitech, it's really ridiculous.

Okay, I've never driven a DTM, so how can I tell if I'm right or wrong?
I can't but I think that if Kunos doesn't necessarily have real value it's to compensate for these lack of feeling let's not forget that we're in a video game everything is not 100% perfect.

I think the BMW kunos look pretty much like the real ones, especially the production models.

PS: I would like to say good things about your work I know what it is and the Temp it takes especially as I appreciate your RUF but here we are really wrong.
You can press "+" on the numpad if you want higher FFB.
S1 is really fun, will try others mods from Arch for sure !
DTM is so good! Thanks.
how do i update from one version to another, without doing all the initial installation process?

If you have the car folders already made, it should be as simple as just dropping all of the car folders in the download into content/cars. It will only replace whatever is in the update, so data.acd and ui folder. The sound, 3D and everything will be intact. The only exception is if car folder names change: as of 27.09.19 only the FD3S has had it happen many updates ago.
Again, you are not in a position to "improve the physics" of any official AC car. You didn't drive these cars IRL, you don't have nearly as much real life track experience as AC devs, nor do you have nearly the amount of data they have, as they are licensed by the manufacturers to create these cars.

You should NOT release these as "improved physics" but "my taste of physics." Improving the physics of a car is little more than changing a few lines of code and making it easier to drive.

As I outlined in my earlier reply, that sentiment is largely false. By doing things like comparing the simulation's outputted suspension angles in the provided developer apps and referencing them against a workshop manual, or perhaps a real measurement, you can find that the cars I have worked on indeed feature incorrect values and I have brought the values closer.
By acquiring schematics or measurements of suspension geometries and comparing them to the original versions, you can indeed determine that the placement of the links is wrong. You can also verify this via comparison of suspension camber and toe curves, for example, as the kinematics of the suspension is derived from it's geometric shape. This car in particular, the E30, is perhaps even over 50% incorrect if the rear suspension is concerned, at some amounts of wheel deflection.
By acquiring things like engine torque curves from a dynometer and comparing them to the Kunos curves, you can indeed determine that mine are numerically closer on average.
By acquiring things like differential lock % statements from manufacturers, and measurements/manufacturer statements of differential preload, you can determine that they are wrong and I have improved on them.
For something more specialized like the ATTESA E-TS system in the Nissan Skyline GT-R cars, you can output the AWD2 lock value from the simulator via a real-time graph reading, and compare it to onboard telemetry of the ATTESA system's center case pressure and indeed determine that my output in similar conditions is closer than the Kunos implementation.

If you prefer mine or not is or if you believe the end result is closer or not is a different matter, but on average it is somewhat difficult to argue that my cars are input number and simulation output number-wise farther from the real values than the original car.

PS: What did you think of any of my cars? You can post in the "support" section.
Just love the work you've been doing withKunos cars.
Just drove the S2 version around Nord. really challenging car, but I find the it a little too loose/slippery, even with Slick rear tyres.
Thank you
Thanks. If you want a more neutral car, you could adjust the front ARB to maximum and lower the rear ARB until it behaves as you want.
Great update! DTM is soo good now.
Feels just like it was meant to, now we just need someone to fix the ugly Kunos E30 and we'll have a full car.
S2 is such a beast. Recommended to use the e30 drift engine sound.
You are doing a fantastic job.
The DTM needs some work indeed.....

Thanks. I'm just following damper spec, so it's unlikely the DTM will be smooth over kerbs. It's just too stiff for the (lack of) downforce. The real dampers and spring have been described as being extremely stiff. I imagine the spec BMW provided is for smooth tracks and not riding kerbs. It's better if you lower the dampers and spring a little + lower the ARBs to the lower settings. 4hz is quite stiff after all. There's still a bit I can do with dampers though + stroke is a bit wrong, so it's needlessly stiff.
Road cars are fine but the DTM becomes unstable over the curbs in a suspicious manner.
Yeah, I'm taking a look at it. Sticking to BMW damper data is unlikely to provide a truly stable result: the springs are too stiff for that anyway. But I don't have accurate damper plots, so they are open to all kinds of change.
Another great mod from you. Thanks a lot!
drives and drifts great! keep it up!
This is one of the best mod I have seen so far in AC. Accurate rear suspension geometry build, E30 unique characteristic and the handling has been very well simulated. My second time in my life to give 5 stars rating
Thanks for your this cool mod and for your work!!!
cool car mod
already feels much more alive than Kunos one
Thank you for making kunos cars better!