• You don't get fast in order to take part in club races, you take part in club races to get fast!
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Dear Guest. Follow RaceDepartment on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Twitch, Steam and YouTube.

Setup settings: opposite of what I expected

Discussion in 'F1 2012 - The Game' started by bad boy, Sep 24, 2012.

  1. bad boy

    bad boy

    Messages:
    8
    Ratings:
    +4
    Hi all.

    I need you help in order to understand setup setting.
    With 2012 for me it's quite difficult to "feel" the car and correct its behaviour by setup.

    On track I cant feel the difference, the only difference is in the time, even if I change the setup in the opposite direction..
    So I have to proceed in the dark and check only the lap time (I'm not Alonso ;) but I'm struggle with legend AI).

    Last night for curiosity I have checked the proposed quick setup.... then I definitely didn't understand nothing.

    This is the setup proposed for a WET race.

    1.jpg

    This one for DRY condition.
    2.jpg

    The opposite I expected....:O_o:
    Same for the roll bar setting.

    P.S. I have a T500 F1 configured like Soylattes in this thread and it feel good for me.
    http://www.racedepartment.com/forum/threads/configuration-ferrari-f1-wheel-integral-t500-rs.56190/

    Bye!
     
    • Like Like x 4
  2. Bram Hengeveld

    Bram Hengeveld
    Administrator Staff Premium

    Messages:
    42,412
    Ratings:
    +16,380
    I am with you here. If that is the correct setting in the game of the rideheight than either we are all doing it wrong or Codemasters made a huge mistake.

    Rideheight one should be a low value (close to the ground, dry setting) where a higher value means that the car is higher (wet setting).

    Interesting find!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Bucefalo

    Bucefalo

    Messages:
    5
    Ratings:
    +1
    So if you're running on high values for rideheight you should get better paces than using low values in dry conditions? This doesn't make sense, if you run too much close to the ground on wet conditions, your car will slide on the water.. Can't understand CM's logic
     
  4. Bram Hengeveld

    Bram Hengeveld
    Administrator Staff Premium

    Messages:
    42,412
    Ratings:
    +16,380
    They had this hickup too with F1 2010 where they had the cambers all mixed up. High negative values on the rear and smaller values on the front :)

    Strange thing is that it was totally wrong and yet didnt effected the handling :)
     
  5. Roberto Costa

    Roberto Costa

    Messages:
    985
    Ratings:
    +480
    Thats weird.
    Even more for the anti roll bar.

    Im really not an expert on stiffness, but at least for the height what i know is that lower ride = more downforce, but for the rain this can't be good due to aquaplaning, so i use a higher ride height. For the bar i believe that using a lower value for the front and higher for the back its better for dry settings and more oversteer, so less agressive values should be used for wet settings. Thats what i believe its right. Bram, correct me if im wrong please :thumbsup:
     
  6. bad boy

    bad boy

    Messages:
    8
    Ratings:
    +4
    Ok, I hoped that it was a my misunderstanding...instead. :(

    So the question is, how can we make a rational setup?

    Bye
     
  7. Colin Knowles

    Colin Knowles

    Messages:
    2,422
    Ratings:
    +1,523

    What if the ride-height slider is different when you put wet weather treads on ??
    Usually a 1cm height difference between slicks & inters or wets i believe !!
     
    • Like Like x 1