I agree and this is my view as well, unless said driver ahead makes an error such as driving wide/ outbraking. I also do not think putting pressure on the driver is "friendly" in this case. It is not their fault a faster driver found themselves behind them and now must suffer [J]; that was becasue of someone else's error.
However, I know that not all will agree with this view. We have seen other examples of this by well seasoned Presto drivers this season. There should be a solid ruling [a consesus view] on this or it will continue....
I also agree!
On the first glance I thought it could have been an option, that first Jim and then Anthony let Tom unlap and then go on fighting (of course if they noticed there's a quicker lapped car behind). But Jim's post widened my view on it and he's right I think. The driver being one lap in front, could be alone on track at this moment and he could possibly let the quicker car unlap
BUT if he's in a distant fight with a driver being on an other strategy and he needs to gain every second he can't be forced to let the quicker car unlap.
So in my opinion a rule for unlapping could sound something like this:
The (quicker) driver who wants to unlap
- mustn't put the driver in front under pressure
- must be sure it will be a super safe move if he makes one
- else he shouldn't even think about a move and wait until the car in front clearl let him unlap
The (slower) driver being one or more laps in front
- is free to decide whether to let the lapped driver unlap or not
- at least has to consider if he has the possibility to let the quicker driver unlap (it could be he who wants to unlap in an other situatuion)
But the main conclusion should be that the lapped driver can't expect anything from the drivers in front.
BTW, ban the super-softs!!! J Can't blame people for being competitive but we can if they are careless...
To be honest I don't understand the wish to ban super softs! I thought we made some changes in pit stops this season to allow as much different strategies as possible?
If you ban super softs, because a driver is faster with them (and therefore dangerous for the rest???) you must also ban hard compound, because a driver is slower then, especially because of much fuel (and could also be a risk for the rest???).
Of course a driver who uses super softs has to consider getting lapped by drivers who are eventually doing less pit stops. And same goes for a heavy loaded driver who has to consider being attacked more often by drivers on a "quicker" strategy and that he can only defend in a fair way. But I don't think this is a new story for PrestoGP drivers especially when it comes to fairness and awareness by/for drivers, who are on different strategies.