Performance Assetto Corsa GTX 1050 TI

[donizete]

Performance Aseetto Corsa.

I have Windows 10.
Intel Core 2 quad.
CPU Q9550 2.83GHZ.
6 GB RAM
GTX 1050 TI.

I get 32 FPS at the start and 42 ~ 45 constants in the race with 20 cars.
No matter what wick in the settings, it always holds this value.
Being 10 or 20 cars.

Is this the maximum amount I can reach?
My Game Settings:

 

[Kristian Maynes]

Download riva tuner and run the monitoring. The 1050 ti is a good gpu, the problem is your cpu. I have 4170 + 1050 ti. If i race with 20 AI, my cpu usage is 99 max and 80-90% on 18 AI. And also, turn off smoke.

 

[RasmusP]

Download riva tuner and run the monitoring. The 1050 ti is a good gpu, the problem is your cpu. I have 4170 + 1050 ti. If i race with 20 AI, my cpu usage is 99 max and 80-90% on 18 AI. And also, turn off smoke.

Nice reply! I agree, that the riva tuner is better, but it's a bit complicated to configure so I recommend open Hardware Monitor. Maybe it's a interesting Tool for you too? You have graphs, min/max etc.

 

[donizete]

I have to change the same processor.
In a while.
I thought about an i5-4670K.

 

[Tobiman]

4670k is excellent. I used it with R9 290 and RX 480 and I get 140fps+ @ 1080 and 100fps @ 1440p.

 

[Giorgos Kostis]

4670k is excellent. I used it with R9 290 and RX 480 and I get 140fps+ @ 1080 and 100fps @ 1440p.

You crossfired r9 290 and rx 480?.

 

[Tobiman]

You crossfired r9 290 and rx 480?.

Nope, I side-graded for better relive and lower power consumption.

 

[paracletus]

While I don't have the 1050ti (1060gtx here), the low frame rates you're getting indicates a problem elsewhere. 1060 runs very smooth, surely the ti shouldn't be too far behind.
I previously ran AC on a 6-year old HD6870 with i7 and even on that graphics card the performance was very good (some settings were turned down).
It must be the cpu is slowing it down, as others have mentioned.

 

[bigal1000]

Performance Aseetto Corsa.

I have Windows 10.
Intel Core 2 quad.
CPU Q9550 2.83GHZ.
6 GB RAM
GTX 1050 TI.

I get 32 FPS at the start and 42 ~ 45 constants in the race with 20 cars.
No matter what wick in the settings, it always holds this value.
Being 10 or 20 cars.

Is this the maximum amount I can reach?
My Game Settings:

View attachment 194775


View attachment 194772

View attachment 194773

I have an i7-7700 Kaby Lake (not a K), ASRock Z board, 16gig ram, Silver Stone AR09-115XS cooler and Asus 1060 6gb ram. I have everything maxed out and still get 140 FPS average on AC, PCars is another matter.......

 

[RasmusP]

I have an i7-7700 not K, ASRock Z board, 16gig ram, Silver Stone AR09-115XS cooler. I have everything maxed out and still get 140 FPS average.......

Nice info, is it right to assume you have a GTX 1050ti?
edit: post above updated

 

[bigal1000]

Nice info, is it right to assume you have a GTX 1050ti?

I an Asus 1060 card, I just updated my post........

 

[RasmusP]

I an Asus 1060 card, I just updated my post........

Thank you! Interesting to see how "low" this game is on the GPUs on normal settings!
I torture my GTX 1070 but I have 4x SGSSAA enabled which is a huge impact.

 

[Kek700]

Mini itx, i5 6600K unclocked, gtx980ti unclocked, all settings within AC max, except track detail set to low and no hdr, shadows set to medium, reflections set to high, max mirror quality , no mirror relections, 2560 x 1080. All settings in NVida control panel are application controlled. Le-mans mazda start grid approx 30 cars, 90 fps, after a few corner back to 143fps.

 

[HypoToad]

I previously ran AC on a 6-year old HD6870 with i7 and even on that graphics card the performance was very good (some settings were turned down).

I have a i3 3220, 8gig ram, HD7770 and set it to 1080p and it looks great and runs fine for me with some settings turned down a bit. I have PCars as well and it runs well also.

 

[jimclark06]

its not exactly the theme of the post but.. i bought a evga gtx 1070 to play very fine AC..but.. the lack of sense of speed is very frustrating to me! a adjust the FOV ..but nothing...so i played 10m and im boring..yes, graphics are brillant..but..its boring run in a straigh at 320 Km/h and seems 70! so..i back to run rfactor....sorry if its offtopic but im very disapointing.whit this game....

 

[donizete]

Speed!
That's what I'm looking for, too.

 

[Giorgos Kostis]

Set the G force values higher maybe?. I don't know.

 

[RasmusP]

Set the G force values higher maybe?. I don't know.

Well theoretically the speed Sensation can't differ from game to game, because they are "physically correct". But of course there are a few things:
- head/car movement. Put them all on max and everything bounces like 500 km/h
- fov. If you put it too high, you'll get a little fisheye view and seem to be faster. But you can't race with that because everything is distorted and you can't estimate any distance (you will crash other cars).
- and Last: motion blur! That really makes a difference! But.. I don't know why but for me motion blur in assetto corsa does nothing.. Googled, found nothing. I will do a thread about it some day

 

[jimclark06]

thanks guys for you reply..torically..the motion blur made much sense of speed..but its a little diferense..so..what i did? put my led tv as monitor..and when a play.. a set the image to 4:3 and the sensation of speed its a little better..sure, its not the ideal, because look a little "large" the cars...but at least the AC look much interest!

 

[GIUSI]

GTX 1050 TI 4 GB - I3 7100 , 1920 X 1080 .... FULL ......70/80 FPS
HAPPY

 

[boern69]

+1
if u have not much money a little overclocking and a i3 cpu will do it .