Heidfeld replaced by Senna for rest of season.

[Kyle Puttifer]

Could you please prove your statement.

Luke McVicar, Grosjean fanatic? :tongue:

 

[Luke McVicar]

last year was a good indication of how slow Petrov learns, this year he is super inconsistent with qualifying yet the car always ends up being around Mercedes pace in the race.

This shows that the car is easily capable of points every race, but there drivers can't seem to get qualifying right and screw there strategy for the race.

Heidfeld has clearly past it, had barely any testing in pre season yet still outscored petrov before he got sacked, Both drivers missed numerous opportunity's to capitalize on the car when it was strong and it shows in the points tally, the car for the first few races was one of the fastest in the feild, but poor driver feedback is likely a reason why they fell back in development.

Renault know Petrov sucks that's why they where soo inclined to sack nick, even though he was around or slighty better then petrov. when they clearly expected him to destroy him.

Petrov might have talent but either way if it wasn't for hes money no team would give him this kind of time to get hes grips together, hes an extremely slow leaner and the only reason he doesn't look that bad this year is because he had a has been driver as a team mate who really didn't even get to have much testing with the car to develop his style around it.

One podium doesn't make you a good driver.

 

[Luke McVicar]

i don't rate Grosjean that highly i just think he wasn't given the best chance in f1 to prove himself but either way what has that got to do with this?