Formula Legacy Manager - 2010s

the_sigman · Nov 9, 2017

+3 Aero
+4 Engine
+1 Mech

Meff28s · Nov 9, 2017

Benutzername said:
I hope i did not miscalculated this, but Vettel id as old as Schumacher was in 2002.

And Schumacher performed a bit better during that time

Age doesn’t count, only peak year
Schumacher peak was 2000
Vettel peak was... 2013

But he is totally under-performing this year, don’t know why, he shouldn’t be this far from Max’s pace

Benutzername · Nov 9, 2017

Meff28s said:
Age doesn’t count, only peak year
Schumacher peak was 2000
Vettel peak was... 2013

But he is totally under-performing this year, don’t know why, he shouldn’t be this far from Max’s pace

One could argue about that. But okay

Meff28s · Nov 10, 2017

@TTupsi ?

Meff28s · Nov 10, 2017

!!! Have your say - FLM !!!

As the 1950 reset comes closer everyday, I need to ask you some questions :

• The new game will be run 3 races at a time. How do you think calendar should be handled ?

Each season should have the same amount of races. The 1953 championship should have the same value/prestige as the 2016 championship and shouldn't be three times shorter. It's also a good thing to compare stats through time for drivers and constructors.. But especially for Managers : we shouldn't be devalued if we win during the early seasons (number of wins & podiums for HoF). 70 years of F1 is 70 years.. not 30 tiny years then 40 long seasons.

The calendar should stick to reality (as far as possible) so that F1 records would be easier to beat through time. This way we would play less time with old drivers & teams and much more during the 90's 00's and 10's with the guys we know the best.

(Hit

or

to vote

)

rubaru · Nov 10, 2017

I think you should change the X to something happier. You're going to get unwanted negative ratings for yourself. Therefore, I'm voting Beer for the second choice.

Jimlaad43 · Nov 10, 2017

Make it three or four updates per season, decide whether it should be 2 or 3 or 4 races per update. Base it on the actual seasons, and early on, add some non-championship extra races if you want.

Meff28s · Nov 10, 2017

• How do you want to see the results of races ?

Exactly as it is currently : Individual sheet for each race & the Championship Standings. This way, we can see how far we are from our opponents in details.

Only the Standings are necessary. We can see our race results easily, the only results that matter anyway.

(Hit

or

to vote

)

kedy89 · Nov 10, 2017

I never understood everyone's problem with the negative ratings

Jimlaad43 · Nov 10, 2017

Meff28s said:
• How do you want to see the results of races ?

Exactly as it is currently : Individual sheet for each race & the Championship Standings. This way, we can see how far we are from our opponents in details.

Only the Standings are necessary. We can see our race results easily, the only results that matters anyway.

(Hit

or

to vote )

Keep it. I find that at the back of the grid I only look at the standings, but at the front I check each race individually.

Milos · Nov 10, 2017

Meff28s said:
• How do you want to see the results of races ?

Exactly as it is currently : Individual sheet for each race & the Championship Standings. This way, we can see how far we are from our opponents in details.

Only the Standings are necessary. We can see our race results easily, the only results that matters anyway.

(Hit

or

to vote )

I think you should decide this yourself based on how much free time you have and the amount of work you're able to put into the sheets.
Personally, I want to see the standings of each race, but if you are struggling to do those standings, I can live without them.