• "Bwoah." - Generic Kimi Quotes.
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. There's no such thing as a stupid question.

AMS Copa Montana vs. rF2 vehicles

Discussion in 'rFactor 2' started by Marc Collins, Jun 25, 2016.

  1. Marc Collins

    Marc Collins

    Messages:
    349
    Ratings:
    +112
    Just an observation for cross-over users of AMS and rF2.

    For many years I have been concerned about a systematic issue in rF2 and just got a eye-opening when I used the AMS Copa Montana "pick-up car."

    I have perceived that rF2 vehicles ALL behave in a way that there is too little grip/too little "weight" at the rear of the car. The very latest CPM cars are much better, but still not quite there--in my opinion. I tried out the Copa Montana and immediately thought I was driving an rF2 car...and then realized, oh yeah, this vehicle is supposed to have a light rear end! It is appropriately light and feels appropriate light relative to the other AMS cars that are not front-heavy pick-up cars. The Boxer feels like a tail-heavy car, as it should.

    I wish so many of the rF2 cars didn't feel like "pick-up cars" in terms of how planted and balanced they drive. Anyone else feel this?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Haha Haha x 1