1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

AMD Catalyst Control Panel (CCC) Settings To Make ISI / RFactor Engine Based Games BEAUTIFUL

Discussion in 'rFactor 2' started by Spinelli, Jan 31, 2014.

  1. I have noticed over the years that getting ISI based games to look great while using AMD graphics cards is very straightforward and always follows the exact same formula....

    NOTE: If you don't feel like reading everything below then just basically make sure the in-game/game config AA is set to none/0x, and in your graphics card's control panel set AA to override app settings, with 2x, 4x or 8x, and type being supersampling. The key here is supersampling.

    A. Anti-Aliasing Mode - Override Application Settings - Unlike most games, make sure to disable all game controlled Anti-Aliasing and leave it up to your graphics card's control panel.

    B. Anti-Aliasing Samples - 2x, 4x, or 8x - 8x will most likely kill your framerate (supersampling AA method, see "D" below) even on new hardware and an older sim, but looks pretty much perfect. Everything, and I mean everything is sharp, clear, clean, defined. Fences, trees, painted lines on the ground, leaves, poles, wires, even when they are far off in the distance all look great, like a photoshopped/edited picture but in live gameplay motion of course :). It makes, for example, Toban at RFactor 1 (w/ high res texture mods) look beautiful and real. Don't worry though because 4x is a VERY good compromise. 4x gives you much more frames and less slowdowns than 8x but it is very, very close to the image quality of 8x. 2x gives even more frames and is what I mostly use because I play with triple monitors and like frame rates to be between 90 & 120. Unlike the IQ of 4x which is hardly a reduction in IQ compared to 8x, 2x does see a noticeable decrease in IQ and you do start noticing the jaggies. I would always though, 100%, rather have 2x supersampling over even 16x or 32x non-supersampling (multisampling or adaptive multisampling) in most ISI based sims, see option "D" below for the reason why.

    NOTE: Experimented tons with quality versions of AA for each respective AA sample amount, for ex. 4xEQ instead of 4x, doesn't do much, if anything, for ISI engine IQ.
    C. Filter - Standard - Experimented tons with edge-detect, doesn't do anything for ISI engine IQ, regardless of AA mode.

    D. Anti-Aliasing Method - Supersampling - The image quality of ISI's engines hardly improve when using regular multi-sample AA even if you're using something insane like 16x or 32x, and unlike most DX9 games the adaptive AA setting (I believe NVidia calls this Transparency AA) hardly improves the image quality as well. This is where Super-sampling AA comes to the rescue, and boy does it ever. The problem with non-supersampling is that many of the things on screen don't get affected by your AA, so even setting the amount of samples to 10000x wont do anything because certain objects/things on screen are just not affected by the AA, period. Supersampling is different because it doesn't care about what's on screen, it affects the entire picture. It uses a technique where it sort of upscales the entire image to a higher resolution and that's why everything looks incredible with supersampling, but also why it kills frames especially with 8x.

    NOTE: Raceroom Racing Experience is the exception here if I remember correctly. RRRE might not be as dependant on supersampling AA in order to get a clean picture as other ISI engine based games are. Simbin seemed to have worked the ISI engine in RRRE very nicely in terms of getting a pretty clean picture without having to resort to supersampling (Simbin are "allowed" to modify the core ISI engine itself and I think even give it their own name).

    E. Morphological Filtering - Off- AMD's version of FXAA. Generally speaking, I'm not a fan of post processing forms of AA. They are POST-processing which means they affect the image after it's already been drawn so they don't really "talk" to the game much and therefore they affect and blur out entire objects/surfaces and textures themselves. FXAA in Battlefield 3 at 1080p turns the ground from insanely sharp, detailed and beautiful to looking like a blurry, console, low resolution, game from 2005. I might as well just buy a console or turn down my game's resolution to 800x600 if I am going to be using FXAA/Morph AA. SMAA is the only one that seems "intelligent" to not affect textures too much while still getting rid of jaggies, but it has to be "injected" with Radeon Pro and can be picky depending on the game you're using, settings, etc. Some games that have badly designed AA programming, and are too intensive to use supersampling AA with, do need a bit of FXAA/Morph AA though. For example, the FXAA in BF3, I still have to keep it on "Low", (1 tick from off) rather than off like I really want to, because BF3 is like RFactor, you can use 10000X regular AA but some things like power lines and many other things just don't get affected by the regular AA mode. Also, if you don't mind/don't notice the lower IQ of FXAA/Morph AA then, for the most part, it is a great and extremely efficient way (fps wise) of getting rid of jaggies. I imagine in a racing sim, as opposed to a shooter, that you would hardly notice or care for blurred textures if it means getting rid of jaggies without having to resort to frame-per-second killing supersampling.

    F. Anisotropic Filtering Mode - ...
    1. Use Application Settings - Set it in-game for the sims that have that option like RFactor 1, RFactor 2 and sims based on those engines (ex. Game Stock Car 2013, ARCA Simracing, Simulador Turismo Carretera, Formula Truck 2013, etc.)
    2. Override Application Settings - For sims based on an older/custom version of ISI's engine with no in-game AF setting (ex. GTR2, GT Legends, Race 07 series, possibly RRRE, etc.).

    G. Anisotropic Filtering Level - Use Application Settings unless if "F" (above) is set to 2 then use 16x or 8x. In some games 8x may give a boost in frames while hardly being a reduction in IQ from 16x. I can rarely notice a difference in far off angled texture sharpness/blurriness (ex. the ground as it gets further and further away from you) between 8x and 16x, but the reason I keep it on 16x is because most games nowadays get like literally a 2 fps improvement when going from 16x to 8x so if that's the case then I might as well max the IQ. There are rare exceptions though, Assetto Corsa, to my surprise, receives some pretty large gains in fps when going from 16x to 8x, and even from 8x to 4x. Real rare though but it happens.

    H. Texture Filtering Quality - High Quality...
    I. Surface Format Optimizations - Off...
    - My OCD makes me always put these to their highest IQ settings for just about all games, period (unless there's a special circumstance for a specific game, which I don't know of any as of now). However, don't be shy in experimenting. You may not notice IQ reduction and may notice fps improvements from changing those settings to "Standard"/"Performance" and "On".

    The last 4 options are for vsync, openGL, and tessellation. Pretty much leave vertical refresh to "Off, unless application specifies" as the game itself should handle vsync on/off unless a special circumstance makes you need to force it from the control panel (very rare). OpenGL triple buffering I leave to default Off, but it's mostly irrelevant as the setting only affects OpenGL based games while most games (including just about every race sim out there) are DirectX based. The 2 tessellation options I actually keep on "Use application settings" instead of the default "AMD Optimized". It won't make a difference to almost any current racing sim, but for any games and benchmark programs that do use some tessellation I like to just use the pure/raw way the tessellation was designed in-game, without any graphics card control panel driver "optimizations" going on.

    NOTE FOR RFACTOR 2 USERS: When using supersampling AA you can go ahead and disable Transparency AA in your PLR file in order to save some FPS. Supersampling AA takes care of all this, so using both offers no image quality benefits while still slightly negatively affecting your FPS (post #4 HERE confirms this, includes pics. Thanks Prodigy). Go into your PLR file and make sure the specific line says "Set Transparency AA=0" (you want it to equal "0" so it's disabled), then save. Make sure you remember to re-enable it (set it back to equal "1" ) if you decide to not use supersampling, or else your trees, fences, crowds, etc. will look much worse. Aside from disabling this while using supersampling AA in order to save some FPS, this should otherwise almost always be enabled.
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2014
    • Like Like x 7
    • Beer Beer x 6
  2. Marco Bijl

    Marco Bijl
    adMAXIhater (O.O.O.)

    Thanks for sharing this valueable information! Just switched to nvidia, but i believe just about the same goes for that.
  3. :)
  4. Thanks - excellent information!
  5. PaulH

    Premium Member

    Works great, Race 07 & GTR 2 looks cleaner & sharper :thumbsup:
  6. Thanks guys. Makes me feel good knowing this has helped some people haha
  7. very informative,thank you ;)
  8. OP updated with the following addition:
    Every frame counts, especially for some of us.
  9. Oh my :0 Can u do a guide for nvidia ? :D
  10. Juan Carlos Garcia

    Juan Carlos Garcia
    Premium Member

    Read your post Spinelli at ISI forum, all about left off things in CCC very good earned performance.

    But i donĀ“t use any AA in rf2, instead SweetFx for this work...http://notworking.url/246619/https://www.mediafire.com/?l115ebtzzbewax6

    For triple monitor with Ati graphyc card, anyone could try to use SoftTH...https://www.facebook.com/softth
    Another time tool in delopment, and better performance and fps stability neither Eyefinity.

    With my Shappire 7870 before goes 50-35 fps and with last build and some of theese performance going 60-50. Resolution 5740x1080.
  11. thanks.. no more blinding corners on asseto corsa...