How to get the best visual quality?

Im running 2 x GTX 670's in SLI and am trying to get the best possible visual quality.

It seems that no matter how high I set the AA or AF there are still lots of jaggies..

Does anyone know how to overcome this?
 
yeah, go to nvidia controll panel and put AA in you controll panel on Assetto Corsa's Profile on max that avaliable not only that but turn all the options on max. if there is no AC profile then make one.
 
Here is what I did to achieve good graphics (for NVIDIA GPU's):

In-game settings:


1- Turn off HDR and Motion Blur (both options are causing that blurry aspect);
2- Set Anisostropic Filtering to 2x (it's VERY resource intensive on this game, don't know why);
3- Set Shadows to High and AA to 4x;
4- Turn off Vertical Sync (use NVIDIA Inspector's one instead);
5- Turn off "Lock Onboard Camera to Horizon";
6- Set Cubemap Resolution to Low (very resource intensive) and Faces per Frame to 6 (for real-time car reflections);

NVIDIA Inspector:

1- Create a profile for Assetto Corsa (add both acs.exe and acShowroom.exe);
2- Set AA Transparency Supersampling to 4x Sparse Grid Supersampling (say goodbye to jaggies and ugly shadows);
3- Set Vertical Sync Tear Control to Adaptive or On (optional).

Results: 60 FPS all the time (except during Monza replays).

My configuration: i5 2300, 4GB, SSD and GTX 660Ti.

Screenshots:

http://imageshack.com/a/img824/434/1wza.png
http://imageshack.com/a/img706/8109/7bka.png
http://imageshack.com/a/img41/2555/xpqs.png
http://imageshack.com/a/img853/9407/ksy6.png
http://imageshack.com/a/img29/3084/8nz7.png
 
Here is what I did to achieve good graphics (for NVIDIA GPU's):

In-game settings:


1- Turn off HDR and Motion Blur (both options are causing that blurry aspect);
2- Set Anisostropic Filtering to 2x (it's VERY resource intensive on this game, don't know why);
3- Set Shadows to High and AA to 4x;
4- Turn off Vertical Sync (use NVIDIA Inspector's one instead);
5- Turn off "Lock Onboard Camera to Horizon";
6- Set Cubemap Resolution to Low (very resource intensive) and Faces per Frame to 6 (for real-time car reflections);

NVIDIA Inspector:

1- Create a profile for Assetto Corsa (add both acs.exe and acShowroom.exe);
2- Set AA Transparency Supersampling to 4x Sparse Grid Supersampling (say goodbye to jaggies and ugly shadows);
3- Set Vertical Sync Tear Control to Adaptive or On (optional).

Results: 60 FPS all the time (except during Monza replays).

My configuration: i5 2300, 4GB, SSD and GTX 660Ti.

Screenshots:

http://imageshack.com/a/img824/434/1wza.png
http://imageshack.com/a/img706/8109/7bka.png
http://imageshack.com/a/img41/2555/xpqs.png
http://imageshack.com/a/img853/9407/ksy6.png
http://imageshack.com/a/img29/3084/8nz7.png

Great settings Andre, thank you i'm running a 660ti as well.
 
Its just like rfactor2 unfortunately. In nvinspector, set your Asseto Corsa profile to application controlled everything, then set 4x sparse grid supersampling. in game set to 4x AA... this will make the image quality very good, but will eat half your frame rate. Asseto Corsa uses a differed renderer, so sparse grid is the only way to get rid of the jaggies.
 
Dont remove anything.Inspector is used only when you want to change game settings.

it means, I will have 2 programms:

-The official Nvidia Panel
-Nvidia Inspector

?

In other words:
Is NVidia Inspector an additional program to the official Nvidia Panel?
or does NVidia Inspector replace the official Nvidia Panel (and in this case, I have to delete the official Nvidia Panel)?
 
Last edited:
I tried "Geforce Experience" (no support for AC) aswell as the Nvidia Control panel and it does not show those specific settings you mention. I have 4x supersampling on and it helps but not enough to make screenshots look clean and "jaggy free".

Using a single GTX670
 
Which is the better video card vendor at present, as in, which performs the best, NVidia or ATi/AMD?

I would choose Nvidia If your main focus is Pcars, rFactor 2 and perhaps even Assetto Corsa. In other games AMD cards perform usually very well but for some reason they have performance issues at least with rFactor 2. I dont think there is clear winner in whole as the performance changes from game to game.
 
Both AMD and Nvidia are erforming about the same with the best cards they sell. It is up to the user what he or she wants.
Some games use the CUDA cores of Nvidia cards for extra effects, but not much software uses it. At the other end, AMD cards are mostly cheaper for the performance they give.
I use Nvidia because I use the cuda cores in some 3d endering software, but if I didn't, I would just go for a good AMD card.
 

Latest News

Are you buying car setups?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Back
Top